---
title: "The Growing Chorus to Cancel NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS)"
id: 97484
type: "post"
slug: "the-growing-chorus-to-cancel-nasas-space-launch-system-sls"
author: "NSE"
published: "2024-10-18T00:35:48+00:00"
modified: "2024-10-18T00:35:48+00:00"
canonical: "https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2024/10/17/the-growing-chorus-to-cancel-nasas-space-launch-system-sls/"
markdown_url: "https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2024/10/17/the-growing-chorus-to-cancel-nasas-space-launch-system-sls.md"
description: "The Space Launch System (SLS) has long stood as NASA's flagship vehicle for deep space exploration, intended to ferry humans back to the Moon and eventually…"
language: "en-US"
category:
  - "Space Economy"
  - "Space Technology"
post_tag:
  - "Deep Space"
  - "Employment"
  - "Government"
  - "Lunar"
  - "NASA"
  - "Space Industry"
  - "Space Launch System"
  - "Space Shuttle"
  - "Space Travel"
  - "SpaceX"
  - "Starship"
---

# The Growing Chorus to Cancel NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS)

![](https://i0.wp.com/newspaceeconomy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/img_3735-1.jpg?resize=696%2C522&ssl=1)

The **Space Launch System (SLS)** has long stood as [NASA](https://www.nasa.gov/)’s flagship vehicle for deep space exploration, intended to ferry humans back to the Moon and eventually on to Mars under the Artemis program. However, recent times have witnessed a crescendo in [calls for its cancellation](https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-10-17/michael-bloomberg-nasa-s-artemis-moon-mission-is-a-colossal-waste).

## The Genesis of Discontent

From its inception, the SLS was envisioned to leverage existing technology from the Space Shuttle program, promising a quick and cost-effective route back to lunar exploration. However:

- **Project Delays**: The SLS has been plagued by delays.
- **Cost Overruns**: Significant exceedances of budget projections.

## The Economic Argument

One of the primary arguments against the SLS is economic:

- **Launch Cost**: Each launch of the SLS is estimated to cost upwards of **$2 billion**.
- **Alternative Technologies**: [SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com/)’s Starship aims for significantly lower costs with its reusable design.

## Technological Redundancy

The technological landscape has shifted since SLS’s design:

- **Reusability**: [SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com/) has proven the viability of reusable rockets.
- **Mission Redundancy**: Why invest in SLS when alternatives can send payloads more frequently?

## Political and Public Sentiment

On news and social media platforms, sentiment has turned:

- **Jobs Program**: SLS is criticized as serving more as a jobs program than advancing space travel.
- **Commercial Shift**: There’s a push towards leveraging commercial partnerships over government-led projects.

## The Path Forward

Proponents for cancellation suggest:

- **Redirecting Focus**: Towards newer technologies like in-space propulsion and habitats.
- **Competitive Industry**: Stimulating a more innovative space industry through private sector engagement.

### Challenges of Cancellation

- **Job Losses**: Concerns about employment in the aerospace sector.
- **Immediate Needs**: The need for a heavy-lift vehicle for certain payloads.
- **Sunk Cost Fallacy**: Billions have already been invested.

## Summary

The debate over SLS’s future encapsulates:

- **Legacy vs. Innovation**: Should legacy programs continue or should there be a shift towards new technologies?
- **Adaptation**: The growing calls for SLS’s cancellation reflect a community eager for progress and efficiency in space exploration.

This pivotal moment challenges [NASA](https://www.nasa.gov/) and the global space community to either adapt to the new space race or risk obsolescence. The conversation on social media platforms shows a desire for a new chapter where innovation drives humanity further into the cosmos.
“\`