The International Asteroid Warning Network: Protecting Earth from DOOMSDAY

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Introduction

Asteroids and comets, collectively known as Near-Earth Objects (NEOs), have been orbiting the Sun alongside our planet for billions of years. While most of these rocky and icy bodies pose no threat, some stray from their usual paths and cross Earth’s orbital trajectory. The possibility of an impact, however remote, necessitates a global system for detecting, tracking, and understanding these celestial visitors. The International Asteroid Warning Network (IAWN) serves as a vital part of this planetary defense effort.

What is IAWN?

The International Asteroid Warning Network is a worldwide collaboration of scientists, observatories, and space agencies. This network is dedicated to sharing information and coordinating efforts related to potentially hazardous NEOs. Established under the guidance of the United Nations, IAWN operates on the principle of open communication and data exchange. It serves as a central hub, connecting various organizations involved in the search for and study of asteroids and comets that could pose a risk to Earth.

IAWN doesn’t directly conduct asteroid searches or operate telescopes. Instead, it plays a central role in ensuring that information flows smoothly between different groups. This includes amateur astronomers, professional observatories, and national space agencies. The goal is to create a unified and effective response to any potential asteroid threat, irrespective of where that threat is first detected. IAWN focuses on facilitating communication and data exchange, rather than directly managing observation or mitigation efforts. This approach leverages the existing expertise and resources of its member organizations, promoting a more efficient and collaborative system.

The network recognizes that a truly global threat requires a truly global response. Asteroid impacts don’t respect national borders, and the responsibility for planetary defense rests with the entire international community. IAWN provides a structure for this cooperation, ensuring that information is shared quickly and efficiently, regardless of political or geographical boundaries.

The History and Formation of IAWN

The need for an international coordinating body for asteroid detection and response became increasingly apparent as asteroid surveys expanded and the number of known NEOs grew. Prior to IAWN’s formal establishment, information sharing was often ad hoc and less structured. While individual researchers and organizations collaborated, there was no centralized, UN-endorsed framework to ensure a consistent and timely flow of information. Recognizing this need, the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) played a key role in IAWN’s formation.

Through its Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, COPUOS established the Action Team on Near-Earth Objects (Action Team 14). This team, composed of representatives from various space agencies and organizations, worked to define the structure and responsibilities of a global warning network. Their recommendations, developed through extensive discussions and consultations, laid the groundwork for IAWN. The Action Team considered various models for international cooperation, drawing on lessons learned from other global scientific collaborations.

Their recommendations led to the formal endorsement of IAWN by the United Nations in 2013. This endorsement wasn’t merely a symbolic gesture; it represented a significant commitment by the international community to address the potential threat of asteroid impacts in a coordinated and collaborative manner. The UN endorsement provided IAWN with the legitimacy and authority needed to effectively fulfill its role.

The endorsement marked a substantial step in global cooperation for planetary defense. It provided a framework for international collaboration, ensuring that information about potentially hazardous objects is shared quickly and efficiently among all relevant parties. The establishment of IAWN was a proactive step, recognizing that while the risk of a major impact might be low in the short term, the long-term threat is real, and preparation is essential.

How IAWN Functions: A Network of Collaboration

The effectiveness of IAWN relies on its network structure and clearly defined operational guidelines. Several key components contribute to its function:

Information Sharing

The cornerstone of IAWN is the prompt and open sharing of data. When an observatory discovers a new NEO, or refines the orbit of a known one, that information is reported to the Minor Planet Center (MPC). IAWN encourages participating observatories to submit their observations to the MPC as quickly as possible, minimizing delays in the dissemination of potentially data. The MPC, acting as a central clearinghouse for NEO observations, then makes this data available to the IAWN community. This allows other observatories worldwide to conduct follow-up observations, further refining the object’s trajectory and assessing its potential for impact.

This open data policy is fundamental to IAWN’s philosophy. It recognizes that the best way to address a global threat is through open collaboration and the free exchange of information. By sharing data openly, IAWN maximizes the collective expertise of the international scientific community. The information sharing extends beyond just raw observational data. It also includes analyses, simulations, and assessments of potential impact risks. This comprehensive sharing of information ensures that all members of IAWN have access to the best available knowledge.

Communication Protocols

IAWN has established specific communication protocols to ensure that information is disseminated effectively. These protocols outline the procedures for reporting new discoveries, sharing orbital data, and issuing warnings if a potential impact threat is identified. The protocols specify the formats for data exchange, the designated communication channels, and the timelines for reporting. This standardization is essential for a rapid and coordinated response, especially in the event of a credible threat.

The communication protocols are regularly reviewed and updated to ensure they remain effective and incorporate the latest technological advancements. This ongoing refinement is necessary to keep pace with the evolving nature of asteroid detection and tracking. The protocols also address issues of data security and confidentiality, ensuring that sensitive information is handled appropriately.

Decision-Making Process

While IAWN facilitates information sharing, the responsibility for issuing warnings to governments rests with individual member states. IAWN provides the data and analysis, but the decision to alert the public and initiate any mitigation efforts remains a national prerogative. This structure respects national sovereignty while ensuring that all countries have access to the best available information. IAWN established criteria that must be reached before a threat warning is issued by any of its member countries. These criteria are based on a combination of factors, including the probability of impact, the estimated size of the object, and the potential consequences of an impact.

The decision-making process is designed to be transparent and objective. IAWN provides clear guidelines for assessing impact risks, and the criteria for issuing warnings are well-defined. This helps to ensure that decisions are based on scientific evidence and not on political considerations. The emphasis on national sovereignty recognizes that different countries may have different thresholds for action and different approaches to risk management.

The Steering Committee

IAWN’s operations are overseen by a Steering Committee. This committee comprises representatives from various participating organizations, including space agencies, observatories, and research institutions. The Steering Committee provides strategic guidance to IAWN, ensuring that its activities align with its overall mission and objectives. The committee meets regularly to review IAWN’s progress, address emerging challenges, and plan for the future.

The Steering Committee guides IAWN’s activities, ensures that it adheres to its mandate, and works to improve its effectiveness. The composition of the Steering Committee reflects the diversity of IAWN’s membership, ensuring that different perspectives and areas of expertise are represented. The committee also plays a role in fostering collaboration among IAWN’s members and promoting the network’s activities to the wider scientific community and the public.

The Role of Different Organizations Within IAWN

A diverse range of organizations contribute to the success of IAWN. Each plays a specific role in the overall effort to detect, track, and characterize NEOs.

Observatories

Observatories, both professional and amateur, are the “eyes” of IAWN. They conduct the sky surveys that discover new NEOs and provide the follow-up observations needed to refine their orbits. These observatories use a variety of telescopes, from small backyard instruments to large, state-of-the-art facilities. The contribution of amateur astronomers is particularly noteworthy; their dedication and enthusiasm often lead to the discovery of new objects and provide valuable follow-up observations.

Professional observatories, often funded by national space agencies or research institutions, typically have access to larger telescopes and more sophisticated equipment. These facilities are capable of detecting fainter objects and making more precise measurements. However, the sheer number of amateur astronomers and their widespread geographical distribution make them a valuable asset to the network. The combined efforts of both professional and amateur astronomers create a powerful global network for NEO detection.

Space Agencies

National space agencies, such as NASA (United States), ESA (European Space Agency), JAXA (Japan), and others, play a substantial role in IAWN. They often provide funding for asteroid surveys, conduct research on NEO characteristics, and develop technologies for potential mitigation efforts. Space agencies also contribute expertise in areas such as spacecraft navigation, trajectory modeling, and impact risk assessment. Their involvement brings significant resources and technical capabilities to the IAWN network.

Many space agencies have dedicated programs focused on planetary defense. These programs support a range of activities, from basic research on NEOs to the development of advanced technologies for asteroid deflection. The commitment of these agencies reflects the growing recognition of the importance of addressing the potential threat of asteroid impacts.

The Minor Planet Center (MPC)

The MPC, operating under the auspices of the International Astronomical Union, serves as the central repository for all NEO observations. It receives, processes, and disseminates data from observatories worldwide, maintaining a comprehensive catalog of known NEOs and their orbits. The MPC plays a role in verifying new discoveries, assigning provisional designations to newly discovered objects, and calculating preliminary orbits.

The MPC’s database is the foundation upon which IAWN’s activities are built. It provides a single, authoritative source of information on all known NEOs, ensuring that all members of the network have access to the same data. The MPC’s work is essential for maintaining the accuracy and completeness of the NEO catalog. The center continuously updates its database as new observations become available, refining the orbital parameters of known objects and adding newly discovered ones.

Research Institutions

Universities and research institutions contribute to IAWN by conducting research on various aspects of NEOs. This includes studying their composition, developing models to predict their trajectories, and investigating potential impact effects. Researchers use a variety of techniques, including laboratory analysis of meteorites, computer simulations, and theoretical modeling, to better understand the nature of NEOs.

Their research helps to improve our understanding of the formation and evolution of the solar system, as well as the potential risks posed by asteroid impacts. The knowledge gained from this research informs the development of mitigation strategies and helps to prioritize planetary defense efforts. Research institutions also play a role in training the next generation of scientists and engineers who will work on planetary defense.

The Importance of NEO Detection and Tracking

The primary objective of IAWN, and the broader planetary defense effort, is to provide timely and accurate warnings about potential asteroid impacts. Early detection is absolutely necessary for effective response.

Time is of the Essence

The earlier a potentially hazardous asteroid is detected, the more options are available for mitigating the threat. With decades or even centuries of warning, relatively small nudges to an asteroid’s trajectory can be enough to prevent an impact. This is because a small change in velocity, applied early enough, can result in a significant change in position over a long period. These early interventions require less energy and are less technologically challenging than attempting to deflect an asteroid on a short-notice collision course.

However, if an object is detected only shortly before a potential impact, the options become much more limited and challenging. Short-warning-time scenarios might require more drastic measures, such as attempting to fragment the asteroid, which carries its own set of risks and uncertainties. The longer the warning time, the more time there is to study the object, plan a mission, and execute a deflection campaign.

Understanding the Threat

Detecting an NEO is only the first step. It’s equally essential to determine its size, shape, composition, and, most importantly, its precise orbit. This requires ongoing observations over time, allowing astronomers to refine the object’s trajectory and calculate the probability of an impact. The size and shape of an asteroid influence the amount of energy that would be released upon impact. The composition determines its density and strength, which also affects the impact consequences.

The precise orbit is essential for predicting whether the asteroid will actually collide with Earth. Even small uncertainties in the initial orbit can lead to large differences in the predicted trajectory over time. Continuous observation and data refinement are needed to reduce these uncertainties and improve the accuracy of impact predictions. This involves using sophisticated models that take into account various factors, such as the gravitational forces of the Sun, planets, and even other asteroids.

Assessing Impact Consequences

The potential consequences of an asteroid impact depend on several factors, including the object’s size, composition, and impact velocity. Even relatively small asteroids, on the order of tens of meters in diameter, can cause significant damage, particularly if they explode in the atmosphere (an event known as an airburst). The Tunguska event in 1908, which flattened a large area of Siberian forest, is believed to have been caused by an airburst from an asteroid of this size.

Larger impacts could have regional or even global consequences. An asteroid a few hundred meters in diameter could cause widespread devastation, triggering tsunamis, wildfires, and potentially even short-term climate change. An asteroid several kilometers in diameter could cause a mass extinction event, similar to the one that wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago. Understanding these potential effects is essential for planning appropriate responses, including evacuation plans, emergency preparedness measures, and long-term recovery strategies.

What Happens if a Threat is Identified?

While the vast majority of NEOs pose no immediate threat, IAWN is prepared to respond if a credible impact risk is identified. The response would involve a series of coordinated steps:

Verification and Refinement

If an object is identified as potentially hazardous, the first step is to verify the initial observations and refine the object’s orbit. This involves gathering additional data from multiple observatories to reduce uncertainties in the trajectory calculations. This often requires a global effort, with observatories around the world contributing their observations to the MPC. The more observations that are available, the more precisely the orbit can be determined.

This stage also involves independent verification by different teams of scientists. This helps to ensure that the initial assessment is accurate and that there are no errors in the data or calculations. The verification process is a quality control measure, designed to minimize the risk of false alarms or missed detections.

Impact Probability Calculation

Based on the refined orbital data, scientists calculate the probability of an impact. This probability is constantly updated as new observations become available. The calculation takes into account the uncertainties in the orbital parameters, as well as the gravitational forces acting on the asteroid. This is a complex calculation, often involving sophisticated computer simulations.

The impact probability is not a simple “yes” or “no” answer. It’s a statistical assessment, expressed as a percentage or a ratio. A probability of 1 in 100, for example, means that there is a 1% chance of an impact. The threshold for considering an object “potentially hazardous” is typically set at a relatively low probability, to ensure that no potential threats are overlooked.

Communication and Notification

If the impact probability exceeds a certain threshold, as defined by the IAWN, the network will communicate this information to its members. Individual member states are then responsible for issuing warnings to their governments and the public. The communication protocols ensure that this information is disseminated quickly and efficiently, using secure channels.

The notification process is designed to be tiered, with different levels of alert corresponding to different levels of risk. For low-probability events, the notification might be limited to scientific experts and government agencies. For higher-probability events, the notification might be expanded to include the public. The goal is to provide timely and accurate information, without causing unnecessary alarm.

International Consultation

In the event of a significant impact threat, there would likely be extensive international consultations, coordinated through the United Nations. This would involve discussions about potential mitigation strategies and how to best coordinate a global response. The consultations would bring together scientists, engineers, policymakers, and disaster response experts from around the world.

The discussions would cover a wide range of topics, including the technical feasibility of different deflection methods, the potential risks and benefits of each approach, and the ethical considerations involved. The goal would be to develop a consensus on the best course of action, taking into account all available information and perspectives.

Asteroid Deflection and Mitigation Strategies

While the focus of IAWN is on detection and warning, a significant amount of research is being conducted on potential methods for deflecting or mitigating an asteroid impact. Several strategies are being explored:

Kinetic Impactor

This technique involves crashing a spacecraft into the asteroid at high speed to alter its trajectory. The momentum transfer from the impactor, though small, can be enough to change the asteroid’s course over time, preventing a collision with Earth. NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission successfully demonstrated this technique in 2022. DART targeted a small asteroid moonlet, Dimorphos, orbiting a larger asteroid, Didymos. The impact successfully changed Dimorphos’s orbital period, demonstrating the viability of the kinetic impactor technique.

The DART mission provided valuable data on the effectiveness of kinetic impactors and helped to validate computer models used to predict the outcome of such impacts. The success of DART was a significant step forward in planetary defense, demonstrating that we have the technology to potentially deflect an asteroid if necessary. Future missions may build upon the lessons learned from DART, refining the technique and developing more sophisticated impactor spacecraft.

Gravity Tractor

This method involves using a spacecraft’s gravitational pull to gradually alter an asteroid’s trajectory. The spacecraft would fly alongside the asteroid for an extended period, slowly tugging it onto a safer path. This technique is more suitable for smaller asteroids and requires a long lead time. The gravitational force exerted by the spacecraft is very small, so it takes a long time to produce a significant change in the asteroid’s velocity.

The gravity tractor method is considered a more gentle and controlled approach compared to the kinetic impactor. It avoids the risk of fragmenting the asteroid, which could potentially create multiple hazardous objects. However, it requires a very long lead time, potentially decades or even centuries, to be effective. The spacecraft would also need to be very massive, or it would need to be positioned very close to the asteroid, which could present technical challenges.

Other Methods

Other, more speculative methods have been proposed, such as using focused solar energy to vaporize part of the asteroid’s surface, creating a jet-like effect that changes its trajectory. This technique, known as laser ablation, would involve using a powerful laser, either based in space or on Earth, to heat the asteroid’s surface. The vaporized material would create a small thrust, gradually altering the asteroid’s course.

Another proposed method involves attaching a large, high-reflectivity sheet to the asteroid. The solar radiation pressure on this “solar sail” could then be used to slowly push the asteroid off course. These methods are still in the early stages of research and development, and their feasibility remains to be demonstrated. They present significant technological challenges, but they also offer potential advantages, such as the ability to deflect larger asteroids or to make adjustments over longer periods. These less-tested methods, while theoretically plausible, require substantial further research and development before they could be considered viable options. They represent longer-term possibilities, rather than near-term solutions.

It is very important to know there is no single “best” method for asteroid deflection. The optimal approach would depend on the specific characteristics of the threatening object, including its size, composition, rotation rate, and the amount of warning time available. A small, loosely bound asteroid might be best addressed with a gravity tractor, while a larger, solid asteroid might be more suitable for a kinetic impactor. The available warning time is also a factor. Techniques that require decades to be effective are obviously not suitable if the impact threat is imminent. A tailored approach, based on the specific circumstances, is likely to be the most effective strategy.

Challenges and Future Directions for IAWN

IAWN has made substantial progress in coordinating international efforts for planetary defense, but challenges and areas for improvement remain.

Enhancing Detection Capabilities

While current asteroid surveys are discovering thousands of NEOs each year, many smaller objects, which could still cause significant regional damage, remain undetected. Expanding the network of ground-based and space-based telescopes is essential to improve detection capabilities. Current surveys are more efficient at finding larger objects, which are brighter and easier to detect. However, smaller objects, in the size range of tens to hundreds of meters, are much more numerous and can still pose a significant threat.

Improving detection capabilities requires both increasing the number of telescopes dedicated to asteroid surveys and enhancing the sensitivity of existing telescopes. Space-based telescopes, in particular, offer advantages because they are not affected by atmospheric distortions or the day-night cycle. However, space-based telescopes are also more expensive to build and operate. A combination of ground-based and space-based assets is likely to be the most effective approach.

Another area for improvement is the development of more sophisticated data processing techniques. As the number of observations increases, it becomes more challenging to identify new objects and accurately calculate their orbits. Advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques can help to automate this process and improve the efficiency of asteroid detection.

Improving International Cooperation

IAWN relies on the voluntary participation of its members. Strengthening international collaboration and ensuring that all countries have access to the necessary resources and expertise are going issues for the network. While many countries actively participate in IAWN, there are still gaps in global coverage, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere.

Expanding IAWN’s membership and encouraging greater participation from developing countries is a priority. This requires providing training and support to scientists and engineers in these countries, as well as helping them to access the necessary technology and infrastructure. Planetary defense is a global responsibility, and it’s important that all countries have the opportunity to contribute.

Another challenge is to ensure that information is shared effectively and transparently among all members. This requires maintaining trust and fostering a spirit of collaboration. Regular communication, joint exercises, and data-sharing agreements can help to strengthen international cooperation.

Developing Mitigation Technologies

Further research and development of asteroid deflection and mitigation technologies are needed. This includes conducting more real-world tests, like the DART mission, to validate the effectiveness of different techniques. While the DART mission was a successful demonstration of the kinetic impactor concept, more tests are needed to refine the technique and explore its limitations.

Future missions might target asteroids with different characteristics, such as different sizes, shapes, and compositions. This would help to build a more database of knowledge about how different types of asteroids respond to kinetic impacts. Research is also needed to develop more sophisticated guidance and control systems for impactor spacecraft, to ensure that they hit their targets accurately.

For other mitigation techniques, such as the gravity tractor and laser ablation, significant technological hurdles remain. These methods require further research and development before they can be considered viable options. This includes developing more powerful lasers, building more massive spacecraft, and demonstrating the ability to control these systems over long periods.

Public Awareness and Education

Raising public awareness about the potential threat of asteroid impacts and the efforts being made to address it is beneficial. This can help to ensure public support for planetary defense initiatives and promote informed decision-making. Many people are unaware of the potential risks posed by NEOs, or they may have misconceptions about the likelihood of an impact.

Effective public communication requires clear and accurate messaging, avoiding sensationalism or exaggeration. It’s important to convey the seriousness of the threat, while also emphasizing that it is a manageable risk. Educational programs, outreach activities, and media engagement can all play a role in raising public awareness.

Involving the public in citizen science projects, such as asteroid searches, can also be a valuable way to raise awareness and engage people in planetary defense efforts. Citizen scientists can contribute valuable data and help to identify new NEOs, while also learning about the science behind asteroid detection and tracking.

Addressing Legal and Policy Issues

As planetary defense efforts mature, there is a growing need to address the legal and policy issues associated with asteroid deflection. This includes questions about liability, responsibility, and decision-making authority. For example, if an attempt to deflect an asteroid inadvertently causes it to impact a different location on Earth, who would be held responsible?

There are currently no international treaties that specifically address asteroid deflection. Existing space law, such as the Outer Space Treaty, provides some general principles, but it does not provide clear guidance on many of the specific issues raised by planetary defense. Developing a clear legal and policy framework for asteroid deflection is essential to ensure that these activities are conducted in a responsible and coordinated manner.

This framework should address issues such as the criteria for deciding to attempt a deflection, the procedures for international consultation and coordination, and the allocation of responsibility for any unintended consequences. It should also consider the ethical implications of altering the trajectory of a celestial object.

Summary

The International Asteroid Warning Network plays a fundamental part in our planet’s defense against the potential threat of asteroid impacts. This global collaboration of scientists, observatories, and space agencies is dedicated to detecting, tracking, and characterizing Near-Earth Objects. By facilitating the open sharing of information and coordinating international efforts, IAWN helps to ensure that the global community is prepared to respond effectively to any potential impact threat. While the risk of a major impact in the near future is low, the potential consequences are severe enough to warrant continued vigilance and investment in planetary defense. The ongoing work of IAWN, together with the broader planetary defense community, working on detection, characterization, and mitigation strategies, provides a measure of insurance against a potentially catastrophic event. The continuous improvements in technology, coupled with strengthened international cooperation, improve our ability to protect Earth from these celestial hazards. IAWN’s efforts highlight both the ingenuity of humanity and our growing commitment to safeguarding our planet from the dangers present in the vastness of space.

10 Best Selling Books About Asteroids

Asteroid Hunters by Carrie Nugent

This concise nonfiction book explains how scientists and survey programs find and track near-Earth asteroids, using real detection methods, data pipelines, and follow-up observations. It also describes why asteroid discovery supports planetary defense decision-making and long-term monitoring of potential impact risks.

View on Amazon

How to Kill an Asteroid: The Real Science of Planetary Defense by Robin George Andrews

This nonfiction narrative describes how modern planetary defense works, including detection, orbit prediction, and deflection concepts that are used to reduce asteroid impact risk. It connects these methods to mission planning, engineering constraints, and the practical realities of responding to a hazardous near-Earth object.

View on Amazon

Fire in the Sky: Cosmic Collisions, Killer Asteroids, and the Race to Defend Earth by Gordon L. Dillow

This nonfiction account outlines the history of major impact events and the scientific evidence that supports modern impact-hazard estimates. It also explains how asteroid surveys, risk modeling, and response planning shape current planetary defense policy and technology choices.

View on Amazon

Catching Stardust: Comets, Asteroids and the Birth of the Solar System by Natalie Starkey

This nonfiction book explains what meteorites and asteroid samples reveal about early solar system chemistry, planetary formation, and the origins of water and organics. It links laboratory techniques and space missions to the broader field of asteroid science for general readers.

View on Amazon

Asteroids by Clifford J. Cunningham

This nonfiction overview summarizes how asteroids were discovered, how their orbits are measured, and how asteroid populations are classified and studied over time. It also explains how cultural interest in asteroids has tracked alongside advances in observation, missions, and impact-risk awareness.

View on Amazon

Cosmic Impact: Understanding the Threat to Earth from Asteroids and Comets by Andrew May

This nonfiction book explains the physical processes behind impacts, including entry dynamics, blast effects, and the role of size and speed in determining damage outcomes. It also presents how scientists estimate frequencies and build impact-hazard scenarios for near-Earth objects.

View on Amazon

Mining the Sky: Untold Riches from the Asteroids, Comets, and Planets by John S. Lewis

This nonfiction work describes the resource potential of asteroids, including metals and volatiles, and explains how in-space materials could support industrial activity beyond Earth. It also connects asteroid mining concepts to mission logistics, propulsion tradeoffs, and the economics of operating far from terrestrial supply chains.

View on Amazon

Rain of Iron and Ice: The Very Real Threat of Comet and Asteroid Bombardment by John S. Lewis

This nonfiction book explains the geological and historical evidence for large impacts and bombardment episodes, including what crater records indicate about long-term risk. It also describes how impact science informs public risk perception and the practical case for asteroid detection and mitigation planning.

View on Amazon

The Asteroid Threat: Defending Our Planet from Deadly Near-Earth Objects by William E. Burrows

This nonfiction book focuses on near-Earth objects, explaining how discovery shortfalls, tracking uncertainty, and communication gaps can affect real-world preparedness. It also describes the institutional and technical steps that can reduce impact risk, from survey coverage to response coordination and deflection readiness.

View on Amazon

Bennu 3-D: Anatomy of an Asteroid by Dante S. Lauretta

This nonfiction atlas-style book presents asteroid Bennu through mission imagery and structured mapping, tying surface features to the science goals of sample-return exploration. It is coauthored by a team connected to the OSIRIS-REx effort and is designed to make asteroid geology and mission results accessible to nontechnical readers.

View on Amazon