Astronauts, UFOs, and the Search for Answers

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

The Final Frontier’s Final Mystery

Astronauts occupy a unique space in the public consciousness. They are figures of immense training, discipline, and scientific rigor, selected from thousands of applicants for their ability to perform under extreme pressure. As pilots, engineers, and scientists, they are considered among the most credible observers on or off the planet. Their accounts from the silent, black void of space carry a weight that few others can match. This makes the intersection of their evidence-based world with experiences that defy immediate explanation a subject of enduring fascination.

When an astronaut reports seeing something they cannot identify, it forces a more serious look at the phenomenon. These are not casual observers; they are individuals trained to understand their environment and their vehicles with absolute precision. The topic is not a simple collection of ghost stories from orbit but a complex look at human perception, the nature of evidence, and the evolution of scientific inquiry at the very edge of our understanding.

It’s essential to draw a line between an Unidentified Flying Object—a literal description of any airborne object whose identity is not immediately known—and an extraterrestrial spacecraft, which is an extraordinary conclusion. It is a distinction that many astronauts themselves are careful to make. Their stories, whether from believers, skeptics, or those simply left with a puzzle, provide a compelling window into one of the greatest mysteries of the space age.

The Believers: Voices from the Void

While many astronauts have reported fleeting, anomalous sightings that were later explained, a small number went much further. They became convinced not only that some UFOs were of extraterrestrial origin but that governments were actively concealing this reality from the public. Two names stand out above all others: Edgar Mitchell and Gordon Cooper. Their journeys from celebrated space pioneers to outspoken advocates for UFO disclosure are as fascinating as the phenomena they described.

Edgar Mitchell: The Epiphany of Apollo 14

Edgar Mitchell was a man of formidable scientific credentials. A captain in the U.S. Navy, aeronautical engineer, and test pilot, he held a Doctor of Science degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). In February 1971, he served as the Lunar Module Pilot for the Apollo 14 mission, becoming the sixth human being to walk on the Moon. His background was steeped in the hard data and precise calculations that defined the Apollo program.

Yet, the most transformative moment of Mitchell’s life occurred not on the lunar surface, but during the quiet, three-day journey back to Earth. As he gazed out the window of the command module at the blue and white sphere of Earth suspended in the vastness of space, he experienced a significant cognitive shift. He described it as a feeling of interconnectedness with the universe, an epiphany that some have termed the “overview effect.” Mitchell himself likened it to a powerful state of meditative consciousness known in Hindu traditions as “samadhi.” This experience fundamentally altered his worldview. He began to feel that conventional science and traditional religious doctrines were inadequate to explain the nature of reality and consciousness.

This spiritual awakening became the driving force for the rest of his life. After retiring from NASA and the Navy in 1972, he founded the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) in 1973. Its purpose was to apply scientific rigor to subjects that were often considered fringe, including consciousness, psychic abilities, and other paranormal phenomena. For Mitchell, these were no longer speculative curiosities but essential avenues for understanding humanity’s place in the cosmos.

It was through this new lens that he approached the subject of UFOs. Mitchell became one of the most high-profile figures to publicly state his belief that humanity was “being visited.” His conviction was rooted in what he claimed were conversations with credible, high-level intelligence and military sources who had been involved with the 1947 Roswell incident. Having grown up in Artesia, near Roswell, New Mexico, he felt a personal connection to the story. According to his sources, the event did indeed involve a crashed alien craft, and the U.S. government had been engaged in a cover-up ever since. He reasoned that the secrecy was motivated by a fear of public panic and a desire to prevent the advanced technology from falling into the hands of rival nations during the Cold War.

A crucial nuance in Mitchell’s story is that he never claimed to have personally seen a UFO. His belief was not based on a visual sighting in space but on what he considered to be unimpeachable testimony from insiders, interpreted through the new framework of consciousness he had adopted after his spaceflight. His journey illustrates a complex psychological path: the “overview effect” didn’t just give him a new perspective; it created a new cognitive model, one open to extraordinary possibilities that his previous, more conventional scientific mindset might have dismissed. His belief in alien visitation wasn’t the cause of his transformation; it was a consequence of it. NASA’s official response to his claims was always a polite but firm distancing. The agency repeatedly stated that while it held Dr. Mitchell in the highest regard as an American hero, it did not share his opinions on this issue.

Gordon Cooper: From Test Pilot to UFO Advocate

Leroy Gordon Cooper Jr. was another titan of the early American space program. As one of the original “Mercury Seven” astronauts, he was a decorated U.S. Air Force test pilot with a reputation for being cool under pressure. His background flying cutting-edge experimental aircraft gave his testimony on aerial phenomena a unique credibility. In 1963, he piloted the final and longest flight of Project Mercury, becoming the last American to fly a solo orbital mission.

Unlike Mitchell, Cooper’s core claims stemmed from direct, personal sightings that occurred before he joined NASA. These formative experiences as a pilot shaped his beliefs for the rest of his life.

The first incident took place in 1951. While flying an F-86 Sabre over West Germany, Cooper reported seeing a group of metallic, saucer-shaped objects flying in formation at a very high altitude and speed. He noted they were moving from east to west, a different pattern from the air traffic he was accustomed to. The air base scrambled its own fighters in an attempt to intercept them, but the objects were too fast and too high, and they were never caught.

The second, more famous incident occurred in 1957 at Edwards Air Force Base in California, a hotbed of experimental aviation. Cooper was managing a flight test project that involved a precision camera crew. One day, the crew burst into his office, visibly shaken. They reported that a silent, saucer-shaped craft had descended, hovered, and then landed on three extended legs on a nearby dry lakebed. As the crew approached with their cameras, the object lifted off without a sound and departed at high speed. The photographers had captured the entire event on high-quality still and motion picture film.

Cooper did not witness the landing himself, but he viewed the developed negatives. He described the images as excellent and showing exactly what the crew had reported. Following protocol, he reported the incident up the chain of command and was ordered by a general to send the film immediately to the Pentagon in a locked courier pouch. He was never instructed not to look at the negatives, so he did. The film was never seen again. Despite the landing of an unknown craft at a top-secret military installation, no official investigation ever took place, at least none that Cooper was made aware of. This event, specifically the confiscation of physical evidence and the subsequent official silence, became the cornerstone of his belief in a government cover-up.

These pre-NASA experiences are often confused with a popular myth that Cooper sighted a UFO during his historic 1963 Mercury-Atlas 9 mission in the Faith 7 capsule. This story, frequently tied to the “Black Knight satellite” conspiracy theory, alleges he saw a greenish glowing object and that it was tracked by ground stations. Cooper consistently and repeatedly denied this. Flight transcripts and his own autobiography confirm that he saw nothing anomalous during that mission. The real drama of Faith 7 was a near-catastrophic cascade of equipment failures that knocked out all automatic systems. In a stunning display of piloting skill, Cooper was forced to manually calculate his reentry trajectory and fly the capsule back to Earth, splashing down just four miles from his recovery ship.

Cooper’s story reveals a complex dynamic where a witness’s actual experiences can become entangled with public myth-making. For decades after leaving NASA, he advocated for government transparency on UFOs, even addressing the United Nations on the subject. He spent much of that time clarifying that his convictions were based on his tangible experiences as a pilot, not on the fictions that had been attached to his famous spaceflight.

The Sightings: Anomalies in Orbit

Beyond the outspoken believers, numerous astronauts and cosmonauts have reported seeing things in space that were, at least for a time, truly unidentified. These accounts are often less about conviction and more about the simple act of observation—reporting a puzzle without jumping to conclusions. The orbital environment is a factory for producing optical illusions. The combination of total darkness, unfamiliar viewing angles, the lack of atmospheric distortion, and the presence of countless pieces of floating, tumbling, man-made debris creates sights that can fool even the most experienced observers.

The Gemini 4 Incident: McDivitt’s Cylindrical Object

In June 1965, the Gemini 4 mission marked a major step forward for the American space program. It was the nation’s first multi-day spaceflight and featured the first spacewalk by an American, Ed White. The mission commander was James McDivitt, a pilot whose handling of an anomalous sighting would become a textbook example of the professional, scientific approach.

During the flight, while his partner Ed White was resting, McDivitt spotted an object out of his window. He described it as a white, cylindrical shape with a thin pole or arm sticking out of one corner. It appeared to be on a parallel course with his Gemini program capsule. He quickly grabbed a camera and took several still photographs and some film footage. Without any frame of reference in the blackness of space, he couldn’t judge its size or distance—it could have been a small object nearby or a massive one far away.

From the very beginning, McDivitt was cautious. He reported the object to mission control but never claimed it was extraterrestrial. He has consistently maintained his belief that what he saw was an unidentified piece of man-made space hardware. The most probable candidate, an assessment supported by space historian James Oberg, was the spent second stage of their own Titan II launch vehicle, which they had attempted to rendezvous with earlier in the mission. McDivitt’s handling of the event stands in stark contrast to how such sightings are often portrayed. He observed an anomaly, he attempted to gather data, and he formulated a conclusion based on probability and known variables. His refusal to leap to an exotic explanation, even when approached by television shows like Unsolved Mysteries, highlights a disciplined commitment to facts over speculation.

The Apollo 11 Light: Aldrin’s Frustration

The most famous space mission in history, Apollo 11, also had its own UFO story, but it’s one that serves as a powerful case study in media distortion. In July 1969, as Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins journeyed toward the Moon, they noticed a light out the window that appeared to be pacing their spacecraft.

The crew’s first thought was that it might be the S-IVB third stage of their massive Saturn V rocket, which they had separated from hours earlier. They radioed Mission Control in Houston to ask for its position. When flight controllers reported that the S-IVB was over 6,000 miles away, the crew ruled it out. Their next logical deduction was that the object had to be one of the four Spacecraft-Lunar Module Adapter (SLA) panels. These were large, petal-like panels that had protected the Lunar Module Eagle during launch and were jettisoned after the crew extracted the lander from the rocket stage. The crew observed the object through their monocular and noted its L-shaped appearance as it tumbled, which was consistent with the shape of these panels and the way sunlight would glint off them. Having solved the puzzle to their satisfaction, they thought little more of it.

Decades later, in a 2005 interview that was featured in a documentary, Aldrin recounted the story. His words were edited and framed in a way that sensationalized the event, implying the crew had a mysterious, unresolved encounter with a UFO. The story went viral, and Aldrin has spent years patiently correcting the record, expressing clear frustration with how his account was twisted. He is adamant: they saw an object, they used a logical process of elimination to identify it as a piece of their own hardware, and, in his direct words, “It was not an alien.” The Apollo 11 incident is less about what the crew saw and more about its aftermath. It demonstrates how a straightforward account of technical problem-solving in space can be warped into a UFO myth by a culture eager to believe in astronaut-alien encounters, even when directly contradicted by the witness himself.

The ISS and Beyond: Modern Sightings and Mundane Explanations

With the permanent human presence in orbit aboard the International Space Station (ISS), sightings of strange phenomena have continued. modern technology, including high-resolution cameras and constant communication with ground control, means that most of these orbital mysteries are solved quickly.

In 2005, during a spacewalk, astronaut Leroy Chiao saw a line of bright lights in a formation he described as an “upside-down check mark.” From his vantage point, they seemed otherworldly. He later determined that what he had seen were the intensely bright lights of a large squid fishing fleet, aligned along a coastline hundreds of miles below on Earth.

In 2013, astronaut Christopher Cassidy spotted an object drifting past the ISS near a docked Progress cargo ship. The sighting caused a brief stir online, but it was quickly resolved. Russian flight controllers identified the object as a discarded antenna cover from the station’s own Zvezda service module.

One of the more bizarre and less easily explained accounts comes from Dr. Story Musgrave, a physician and veteran of six Space Shuttle missions. Musgrave reported seeing a long, white, snake-like object on at least two separate missions in the 1990s. He described it as being perhaps six to eight feet long and appearing to “swim” through space with an undulating motion. While skeptical explanations suggest it could have been a piece of space debris, such as a lost rubber seal from a rocket engine twisting and turning in the vacuum, the description remains a compelling and unresolved anomaly from one of NASA’s most experienced astronauts.

These cases show that what might have become an enduring UFO legend in the 1960s is often just a quickly solved puzzle today. Yet, accounts like Musgrave’s “snake” demonstrate that not every sighting fits neatly into the category of space debris or optical illusion.

Echoes from the East: Soviet and Chinese Encounters

The history of anomalous sightings in space is not limited to American astronauts. Soviet cosmonauts and Chinese taikonauts have also reported puzzling experiences. These accounts, often emerging from behind a veil of state secrecy, add another layer of complexity to the global phenomenon. The nature of these reports and their explanations often mirrors the political and technological eras in which they occurred.

Cosmonauts and Their “Space Guests”

During the Cold War, the Soviet space program operated with a level of opacity that meant sightings were rarely discussed publicly in real time. This information vacuum allowed some accounts to grow into enduring legends.

Major General Pavel Popovich, the fourth cosmonaut in space (Vostok 4, 1962), shared a compelling story that took place not in orbit, but on Earth. While flying home from Washington, D.C. on a commercial airliner with a delegation of scientists, he and the other passengers were startled to see an object out the window. He described it as a bright white, perfect triangle flying on a parallel course. It was moving significantly faster than their plane, which was traveling at about 600 mph; he estimated the object’s speed at over 900 mph. It paced them for 30 to 40 seconds before accelerating away. The pilots contacted ground control, which reported nothing on radar. The story is made more intriguing by his marriage to Marina Popovich, a celebrated Soviet test pilot who, after her retirement, became one of Russia’s most prominent UFO researchers and authors.

In May 1981, Major General Vladimir Kovalyonok was commanding the Salyut 6 space station when he observed a strange object through a porthole. He described it as a glowing, pulsating, barbell-shaped object. He called his crewmate, Viktor Savinykh, to see it, but just as Savinykh arrived, the object appeared to experience an impulse or flash, then separated into two distinct glowing orbs connected by a thin line before fading away. He immediately reported it to ground control. A skeptical explanation later proposed by historian James Oberg was that the crew had witnessed a secret missile launch or some other satellite-related event, but no such test was ever confirmed to have taken place on that day.

A decade later, in 1991, veteran cosmonaut Musa Manarov was filming the docking of a Soyuz transport craft with the Mir space station. His camera captured a phosphorescent object that seemed to spiral away from the docking port. The footage was even shown on Moscow television. Manarov himself stated at the time that he believed he saw the object detach from the incoming craft, strongly suggesting it was a piece of insulation or some other man-made debris.

The contrast between these Cold War-era accounts and modern Russian sightings is stark. In August 2020, cosmonaut Ivan Vagner was shooting a time-lapse video of the Aurora Australis from the ISS when he captured five bright objects flying in a perfect, evenly spaced line. He playfully tweeted the video, calling the objects “space guests,” and reported the sighting to Roscosmos, the Russian space agency. The agency retweeted his post, calling the video “mysterious.” in the age of social media and publicly available satellite tracking data, the global community immediately began its analysis. The mystery had a short lifespan. Within a day, the most likely explanation emerged: the objects were a recently launched train of Starlink satellites from SpaceX. Vagner later concurred with this assessment. This incident shows how technology and transparency have changed the game; what once might have become a decades-long mystery was solved almost instantly.

The Knocking on Shenzhou 5

One of the most unusual accounts from any space program is auditory, not visual. In October 2003, Yang Liwei became a national hero in China as the first “taikonaut” to travel into space aboard the Shenzhou 5 spacecraft. During his 21-hour flight, he experienced something deeply unsettling. He reported hearing a repetitive knocking sound.

He described it as not coming from inside or outside the capsule, but as if someone were striking the body of the spacecraft with a wooden hammer on an iron bucket. The sound was unnerving, and when he looked out the porthole, he could find no cause. The mystery deepened when the crews of the subsequent Shenzhou 6 and Shenzhou 7 missions reported hearing the same strange noise.

This created a paradox: space is a vacuum, so how could there be a sound that seemed to come from outside? The mystery was later solved not by postulating an external actor, but by understanding the physics of the spacecraft itself. The official explanation, which Yang now accepts, is that the sound was caused by the normal physical behavior of the capsule’s hull. As the spacecraft transitioned from the pressure of the atmosphere to the vacuum of space, the extreme changes in external pressure and temperature caused the materials of the inner wall to slightly deform and contract. This tiny, intermittent structural shift produced the eerie knocking sound. It’s a powerful lesson in scientific problem-solving: the answer to the paradox lay in understanding the system and its reaction to its new environment, not in assuming a mysterious, external cause.

Notable Sightings

The following table synthesizes the most prominent accounts into a single reference, allowing for a clear comparison of the events, their context, and their ultimate explanations.

The Skeptics and the Science: A Universe of Possibilities

For every astronaut who became a believer, there are many more who, while open to the possibility of extraterrestrial life, remain deeply skeptical of claims that it has visited Earth. Their perspective, grounded in scientific principles and a demand for evidence, provides a crucial counterbalance. This view is increasingly reflected in NASA’s own official stance, which has evolved from outright dismissal to cautious, scientific engagement.

The Astronaut’s Perspective on Alien Life

Many scientifically-minded astronauts share a nuanced viewpoint that separates the belief in alien life from the belief in alien visitation. Commander Chris Hadfield, a former fighter pilot and commander of the International Space Station, is a prominent voice for this perspective. He has stated that given the trillions of stars in billions of galaxies, the odds are “fundamentally infinite” that life has arisen elsewhere. It seems a statistical certainty.

He is quick to add that this is a far cry from proving that aliens are flying around in our skies. Hadfield notes that he has seen “countless things in the sky” that he couldn’t immediately explain, both as a pilot and as an astronaut. But, he says, to see something you don’t understand and immediately conclude that it’s intelligent life from another solar system is “the height of foolishness and lack of logic.” He stresses that, to date, we have found zero definitive evidence of life anywhere but Earth.

Dr. Jeff Hoffman, a veteran of five Space Shuttle flights, including the first mission to service the Hubble Space Telescope, echoes this sentiment perfectly. He personally believes there is life elsewhere in the universe. But, speaking as a scientist, he clarifies his position: “I look for evidence. And as yet, we have no evidence. So I have nothing to support my belief. But I still believe it.”

This perspective represents the intellectual core of the modern scientific approach to the question. It embraces the statistical likelihood of extraterrestrial life as a fascinating probability while maintaining a strict, evidence-based standard for claims of visitation. It reframes the debate from a simple “believer vs. non-believer” binary into a more sophisticated discussion about the nature of scientific proof. It is possible to hold two ideas simultaneously: a philosophical or statistical belief in alien life, and a scientific rejection of current claims of alien visitation due to a lack of verifiable, empirical evidence.

NASA’s Evolving Stance on UAP

For most of its history, NASA’s official position on UFOs was one of disinterest and dismissal. A 1970 letter from an assistant administrator stated that after fifteen years of human spaceflight, including landings on the Moon, astronauts had brought back “not a shred of evidence—verbal, photographic, or otherwise—for the existence of extraterrestrial spacecraft.” For decades, the agency did not track UFOs and generally considered the topic to be outside its purview.

This stance began to change dramatically in the 21st century. Spurred by a new wave of credible reports from military aviators, complete with radar and infrared sensor data, and a corresponding shift in the political landscape, the “do nothing” position became untenable. In 2022, NASA commissioned a 16-member Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team. The very creation of this panel was a historic event. The deliberate use of the term Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) instead of UFO was part of an effort to destigmatize the subject and re-center it on rigorous, data-driven inquiry.

The team’s final report, released in September 2023, marked a watershed moment in NASA’s public posture. Its key findings were clear:

• There is no evidence of extraterrestrial origin for UAP.
• The primary obstacle to understanding UAP is a severe lack of high-quality, well-calibrated, and multi-sensor data. Most sightings are so poorly documented that drawing firm scientific conclusions is impossible.
• A small number of sightings truly cannot be explained with the limited data available.

The report’s most significant contribution was its roadmap for the future. It called for NASA to take a leading role in a government-wide effort to apply scientific rigor to the problem. The recommendations included using NASA’s own powerful Earth-observing satellites to study the environmental conditions around UAP sightings, leveraging commercial satellite data, applying artificial intelligence and machine learning to sift through massive datasets for anomalies, and helping to create a standardized system for public and pilot reporting. In a concrete step, NASA also announced the appointment of a new director of UAP research.

This represents a significant institutional shift. The goal is no longer to ignore the phenomenon or to “find aliens,” but to solve a data problem. By focusing on data acquisition, calibration, and analysis, the agency is building the foundation for genuine scientific discovery, whatever the ultimate nature of UAP may be. The subject is finally moving from the realm of anecdote and sensationalism into a formal scientific problem.

Summary

The history of astronauts and UFOs is a rich tapestry of human experience at the edge of the known world. It encompasses the significant, life-altering convictions of believers like Edgar Mitchell, whose journey was sparked by a spiritual epiphany in deep space, and Gordon Cooper, whose beliefs were forged in the cockpit and solidified by perceived government secrecy. It includes the calm, professional observations of figures like James McDivitt and Buzz Aldrin, whose puzzling sightings were resolved through logic but have been persistently mythologized by a public hungry for mystery.

The international dimension reveals that anomalous experiences are a universal part of spaceflight. Accounts from Soviet cosmonauts and Chinese taikonauts show that strange sights and sounds are not unique to any one nation’s program. Yet, the interpretation and explanation of these events often reflect the technological capabilities and political climate of their time, with Cold War-era mysteries enduring far longer than modern sightings that are quickly demystified by global data sharing.

Throughout these stories, a crucial distinction remains. The high statistical probability of life existing somewhere in the vastness of the cosmos—a view shared by scientifically-minded astronauts like Chris Hadfield—is a separate issue from the question of whether that life has visited Earth. The former is a logical inference based on the sheer number of planets; the latter is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence. To date, that evidence remains elusive.

The pivotal shift in this long narrative is the recent engagement by NASA. The agency’s 2023 UAP report, spurred in part by the decades of credible reports from its own astronauts and military pilots, has moved the subject from the fringe to the forefront of scientific inquiry. The ultimate mystery is no longer just what is in our skies, but how we can build the tools and methodologies to see it clearly and understand it. The search for answers, now officially sanctioned and scientifically structured, has truly begun.

What Questions Does This Article Answer?

• How do astronauts’ sightings in space differ from casual UFO observations on Earth?
• What was the most transformative moment of Edgar Mitchell’s life and how did it impact his beliefs?
• What is the Institute of Noetic Sciences and why did Edgar Mitchell found it?
• What are the details of the UFO sightings that Gordon Cooper experienced before his NASA career?
• How did the public misconception about Buzz Aldrin’s UFO sighting during the Apollo 11 mission arise?
• What explanation was eventually given for astronaut Leroy Chiao’s sighting of strange lights during a spacewalk?
• What historical significance did the UFO reports from Soviet and Chinese space programs hold during the Cold War?
• How has NASA’s official stance on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) evolved over time?
• What steps is NASA taking to scientifically investigate UAP sightings based on the recommendations of the 2023 report?
• What implications do the astronauts’ and cosmonauts’ UFO sightings have for our understanding of extraterrestrial life?

Last update on 2025-12-21 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API