Did Aliens Really Visit Our Ancestors? The Evidence Says… Probably Not.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Searching the Skies of Antiquity

The modern era of “flying saucers” began in 1947, ushering in decades of reports, investigations, and speculation. Yet, for as long as the topic has captured the public imagination, a parallel field of inquiry has looked not to the future, but deep into the past. This exploration operates on a simple, compelling question: If Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) are visiting Earth now, is it possible they also visited our distant ancestors?

This article explores the search for UAP in antiquity. It is a field built on the re-examination of ancient art, artifacts, and texts. Proponents believe they have found a pattern of evidence, a “smoking gun” in hieroglyphs or a detailed description of a spacecraft in a holy book. They suggest ancient peoples witnessed incredible technologies and, lacking the vocabulary to describe them, interpreted them through the only lens they had: religion and myth.

Conversely, the academic and scientific consensus views these interpretations as a fundamental misreading of the historical record. Archaeologists, historians, and anthropologists see not “ancient astronauts” but rich cultural symbolism, meteorological events, and the psychological projection of modern anxieties onto the past.

Objectively assessing these claims requires navigating a difficult landscape. It means separating an artifact from its interpretation and understanding the immense cultural gulf that separates the 21st-century mind from that of a Roman augur or a Maya scribe.

Defining the Ancient “Sighting”

The very term “ancient UAP” is an anachronism. The concept of an “unidentified flying object” as a distinct category of phenomenon – something separate from a bird, a cloud, or a spiritual vision – is a modern one, born from aviation and the Cold War.

Ancient cultures did not share this categorization. For them, the sky was the realm of the divine. Any unusual event, from a comet to a “sun dog,” was a message from the gods, an omen, or a direct divine manifestation. They didn’t see an “unidentified” object; they saw a sign whose meaning needed to be interpreted by priests or oracles.

The search for ancient UAP, sometimes called “paleo-ufology” or associated with the “ancient astronaut theory,” involves sifting through these records for events that do not fit neatly into known categories. Proponents look for descriptions that seem strangely “mechanical” or “non-natural,” or artistic depictions that appear technological to a modern eye.

The challenge is one of translation, not just of language, but of worldview. When an ancient text describes a “fiery chariot” or a “glowing shield” in the sky, is it a literal, observational report of a craft? Or is it a culturally conditioned, metaphorical description of a natural event, like a meteor, ball lightning, or an atmospheric plasma discharge?

This ambiguity is the territory where the entire debate takes place. Mainstream science approaches this by seeking the most plausible terrestrial explanation. This includes:

• Astronomical Events: Comets, meteors, bolides, supernovae, sun dogs (parhelia), and planetary conjunctions.
• Meteorological Events: Ball lightning, St. Elmo’s fire, unusual cloud formations (like lenticular clouds), and complex mirages like a Fata Morgana.
• Psychological Factors: The human tendency for pareidolia (seeing patterns in random data), confirmation bias, and the unreliability of eyewitness testimony, especially when filtered through cultural and religious belief.
• Symbolism: Recognizing that ancient art and text were primarily symbolic, not literal. A “wheel” in a religious text may represent omniscience, not a piece of landing gear.

The alternative view, popularized by authors like Erich von Däniken, holds that these explanations are insufficient. They argue that the sheer consistency and strangeness of certain accounts point to a genuine anomaly, best explained as encounters with non-human intelligence.

The Artifacts: “Evidence” in Stone and Paint

Some of the most frequently cited pieces of evidence for ancient UAP are not written texts but images carved in stone or painted on cave walls. To the modern observer, some of these images appear strikingly technological.

The “Helicopter Hieroglyphs” of Abydos

Perhaps the most famous pictorial “evidence” comes from the Temple of Seti I at Abydos in Egypt. On a heavy stone lintel, a series of hieroglyphs seem to clearly depict a modern helicopter, a submarine, and a futuristic aircraft.

The UAP interpretation is straightforward: these images are proof that ancient Egyptians had either seen or possessed knowledge of such advanced technology. The resemblance, particularly of the helicopter, is undeniable and startling. It appears to have a rotor, a fuselage, and a tail fin, far more in line with a 20th-century attack helicopter than anything from the Nineteenth Dynasty.

The egyptological explanation is well-documented and demonstrates a key principle of interpreting ancient artifacts: context. The panel in question is a palimpsest. This means the original inscription was altered by a later ruler.

The lintel was first carved during the reign of Seti I. His son, Ramesses II, later had the inscriptions modified. The process involved filling the original, deep-cut hieroglyphs with plaster and then re-carving a new set of titles and glyphs on the surface. Over the millennia, the plaster has fallen out.

The “helicopter” is the accidental result of two different hieroglyphs overlapping. The original glyph, part of Seti I’s title, was “He who repulses the Nine Bows” (a term for Egypt’s enemies). The later glyph, part of Ramesses II’s title, was “He who protects Egypt and overthrows foreign countries.”

The “helicopter” body and rotor are parts of the “Nine Bows” glyph (a bow and arrows), while the “tail” is part of the later carving. The “submarine” and “aircraft” are similarly chance superimpositions of different glyphs, suchs as a hand, a basket, and a mouth, which have blended together to create a new, unintended image. It is a striking example of pareidolia, where our modern brains, primed to recognize helicopters, see one in a 3,000-year-old carving.

The Sarcophagus of Pacal the Great

In Mesoamerica, the focus turns to the ancient Maya city of Palenque. Inside the Temple of the Inscriptions, the tomb of the 7th-century ruler K’inich Janaab’ Pakal, or Pacal the Great, was discovered. The intricately carved lid of his sarcophagus has become a centerpiece of ancient astronaut theories.

The proponent’s view, made famous by Chariots of the Gods?, is that the lid depicts Pacal at the controls of a spacecraft. In this interpretation, Pacal is shown reclining in a seat, his hands on controls, his foot on a pedal, and a breathing apparatus near his nose. The complex imagery surrounding him is interpreted as the rocket’s engine, complete with flames and exhaust.

The academic interpretation, grounded in decades of research into Maya mythology and iconography, tells a completely different story. The image is not a technological diagram but a rich, symbolic depiction of a spiritual transition.

Pacal is shown at the moment of his death, balanced between the living world and the underworld, known as Xibalba. He is not “reclining” but falling backward into the “maws of the earth,” represented by the skeletal jaws of the Earth Monster below him.

The “rocket” he is in is actually the World Tree (or Cosmic Tree), which the Maya believed connected the three planes of existence: the underworld, the terrestrial world, and the heavens. Pacal is shown ascending the tree as part of his resurrection and transformation into a deity. The “flames” at the bottom are not exhaust but the roots of the World Tree, and the “breathing apparatus” is a common stylized representation of the “breath of life” or a jewel. The “controls” are standard Maya motifs, and the bird at the top (the Celestial Bird) represents the heavenly realm.

For Mayanists, the lid is a masterpiece of religious art, perfectly illustrating their cosmological beliefs about death and rebirth. The “spaceship” interpretation is seen as a projection of modern technological concepts onto a culture whose primary concerns were spiritual.

The Wondjina and the Tassili n’Ajjer “Martians”

Prehistoric rock art provides even more ambiguous canvases. In the Kimberley region of Australia, the Aboriginal people have a long tradition of painting the Wondjina (or Wandjina). These figures are depicted with large, black, lidless eyes, white faces, and a “halo” or band around their heads. They notably lack mouths.

To UAP proponents, the Wondjina are a perfect representation of the “Grey” alien archetype common in modern abduction reports. The large heads, huge black eyes, and slender bodies seem to match descriptions from the 20th and 21st centuries.

Anthropologists and the local Aboriginal people themselves offer a clear cultural explanation. The Wondjina are not physical beings but powerful, supernatural creator spirits associated with rain, lightning, and the monsoon. They are “cloud-spirits.” Their lack of a mouth is intentional; they are so powerful that if they had mouths, their speech would create a continuous deluge. The “halos” are not helmets but representations of the lightning and clouds from which the Wondjina control the weather.

A similar case exists in Tassili n’Ajjer, a national park in the Sahara Desert in Algeria. The vast complex of rock art, dating back as far as 12,000 years, shows a changing environment and the cultures that lived there. Among the images of giraffes, cattle, and humans, there are strange figures with large, round heads, sometimes described as “helmeted.”

These “Martians,” as they are sometimes called, are cited as depictions of visiting astronauts in suits. The anthropological view places them within the context of shamanism and ritual. The round heads are likely ceremonial masks, elaborate headdresses, or symbolic depictions of spirits. Such ritual attire is common in pre-literate societies worldwide and is used to invoke deities or enter a trance state. The paintings are records of culture and religion, not a visitor’s log.

Interpreting Ancient Texts

While art is open to visual interpretation, ancient texts seem to offer something more solid: eyewitness accounts. Yet here, the gap in worldview and literary convention is even more pronounced.

Ezekiel’s “Wheel Within a Wheel”

One of the most complex and cited examples is the vision described in the Book of Ezekiel from the Hebrew Bible. Ezekiel, a prophet in exile in Babylon, describes a “storm wind” from the north, a “great cloud with brightness around it,” and “fire flashing forth.” From within, he sees four “living creatures,” each with four faces (human, lion, ox, eagle) and wings.

Most compelling for UAP proponents is his description of their “wheels”:

“Their appearance and their construction were as it were a wheel within a wheel… When they moved, they went in any of their four directions without turning as they went… and the rims were full of eyes all around.”

This description – a metallic object, moving without turning, equipped with “wheels within wheels” (gyroscopes?) and “eyes” (lights?) – has been seized upon as a strikingly accurate, if primitive, description of a sophisticated machine. In the 1970s, a NASA engineer named Josef F. Blumrich even wrote a book, The Spaceships of Ezekiel, in which he argued the “chariot” was a workable omnidirectional spacecraft, patenting his own version of its wheels.

The theological and literary consensus understands Ezekiel’s vision not as a literal report but as a significant piece of apocalyptic literature. This style of writing is intentionally symbolic, surreal, and designed to convey theological truths, not physical ones.

Ezekiel’s vision is a Merkabah, or “chariot-throne,” of God. It’s a symbolic depiction of the divine presence in all its glory and terror. The four faces represent the four corners of creation (humanity, domesticated animals, wild animals, birds). The wheels-within-wheels that can move in any direction represent God’s omnipresence (He can be anywhere and move anywhere). The “eyes” on the rims represent God’s omniscience (He sees everything).

Ezekiel wasn’t a journalist reporting on a landing; he was a prophet having a mystical experience, using the rich and complex Near Eastern mythology available to him (like the winged-beast “cherubim”) to describe the indescribable majesty of his god.

The Vimanas of Ancient India

Ancient Hindu texts like the Ramayana and Mahabharata contain descriptions of Vimanas. These are “flying chariots” or “flying palaces” used by the gods.

Proponents of the ancient UAP theory point to these texts as more than myth. They are seen as records of actual flying machines. The Ramayana describes the Pushpaka Vimana of the demon-king Ravana as a craft that could fly at the “speed of the mind,” traveling great distances. Some interpretations of the texts claim they describe aerial warfare, with “iron thunderbolts” and “weapons of light,” likening them to modern missiles and energy weapons.

The cultural and literary context is clear. The Vimana is a mythological element, a standard attribute of divine power, just as Greek mythology has Hermes’ winged sandals or Apollo’s sun chariot. They are metaphors for the power of the gods, who are not bound by earthly limitations.

Much of the “technical” detail cited by proponents comes from a much later, 20th-century text called the Vaimānika Shāstra. This work was supposedly channeled in the early 1900s and claimed to be a transcription of a lost ancient text. However, a 1974 study by aeronautical and mechanical engineers at the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore analyzed the “blueprints” described in the text. Their findings were conclusive: the designs were “unfeasible,” “anachronistic,” and “aerodynamically unviable.” The language and concepts (like “mercury vortex engines”) were found to be modern, not ancient.

Roman Omens and “Phantom Ships”

The Roman Republic and Empire provide a wealth of written records. Historians like Livy, Pliny the Elder, Plutarch, and Cassius Dio diligently recorded prodigia – prodigies or omens. These were unusual events believed to foretell major happenings, like wars, plagues, or the death of an emperor.

UAP researchers have combed these accounts for “reports” that sound technological.

• In 218 BC, Livy wrote that “phantom ships had been seen gleaming in the sky.”
• In 173 BC, it was reported that “at Lanuvium a spectacle of a great fleet was said to have been seen in the sky.”
• In 100 BC, Plutarch describes “a great flaming spear” descending from the sky and “flaming shields” (clipei ardentes) battling.
• Pliny the Elder, in his Natural History, mentions a “spark falling from a star” that grew in size as it fell, becoming “larger than the moon” before rising back to the sky.

The UAP interpretation is that “phantom ships” and “fleets” are descriptions of flotillas of unknown craft. The “flaming shields” are classic disc-shaped UAPs. The “spark” that grows and retreats sounds like an intelligent vehicle.

The historical and scientific context provides more mundane, though still fascinating, explanations. The Romans lived in a pre-scientific world where the sky was a canvas for divine communication. Priests (augurs) were tasked with interpreting these signs.

• “Phantom ships” and “fleets” are likely descriptions of complex mirages like a Fata Morgana, which can make objects on the distant horizon (like islands or other ships) appear to be floating in the air. They could also be unusual, fleet-like cloud formations.
• “Flaming shields” (clipei ardentes) are a compelling description of bright, disc-shaped parhelia, or sun dogs. These atmospheric phenomena are caused by light refracting through ice crystals, creating bright “mock suns” or halos that can look like glowing shields flanking the sun.
• The “flaming spear” is a classic description of a bolide or a large meteor breaking up as it enters the atmosphere.
• Pliny’s “spark” that grew and retreated could be a description of a rare phenomenon like ball lightning, or a misinterpretation of a meteor’s trajectory.

The key is that Romans were not identifying objects; they were reporting omens. Their goal was not scientific classification but religious and political interpretation.

Medieval and Renaissance Anomalies

As history moves closer to the modern age, the reports become more detailed, yet the same interpretive challenges remain.

The 1561 Nuremberg Celestial Phenomenon

One of the most dramatic events occurred on April 14, 1561, over Nuremberg, Germany. A “broadsheet” (an early form of newspaper) printed at the time, described the event, accompanied by a famous woodcut illustration.

According to the text, at dawn, a “dreadful apparition” occurred. Many men and women saw “many objects… blue or black, or the color of blood.” They appeared as “spheres,” “crosses,” and “two great tubes” or “pipes” from which smaller spheres emerged. These objects “began to fight with one another.” The “battle” supposedly lasted for an hour, after which “they all fell from the sun down upon the earth” and “vanished in a great smoke.” A “black, spear-like object” was also seen.

To UAP proponents, this is one of the most powerful historical cases. It’s an eyewitness account, published at the time, of an aerial dogfight involving different types of craft (“spheres,” “crosses,” “cylinders”) and a “mothership” (“the great tubes”). The objects moved erratically, fought, and then “crashed” or “retreated.”

The contextual explanation points to a confluence of a spectacular atmospheric event and the significant religious anxieties of the era. This was the height of the Protestant Reformation, a time of intense religious conflict and apocalyptic fervor. People were primed to see signs of divine judgment in the sky.

Meteorologists and historians suggest the event was a complex sun dog (parhelion) phenomenon. These events can create multiple “mock suns” (the spheres), bright pillars of light (the cylinders/pipes), and luminous arcs and crosses (the crosses). These refracted patches of light would seem to “dance” or “jiggle” in the sky as the atmospheric ice crystals shifted.

The “battle” is the human interpretation, projecting the religious and military conflicts of the day onto the sky. The “crash” and “smoke” would be the phenomenon fading as the sun rose higher, causing the ice crystals to melt or disperse. The “black spear” is also a known atmospheric phenomenon, a type of atmospheric shadow or pillar.

A similar event was reported over Basel, Switzerland, in 1566, also documented in a broadsheet. It described “large black spheres” that “fought” near the rising sun. This, too, is seen by proponents as an aerial battle, and by scientists as another misinterpretation of astronomical or atmospheric phenomena, possibly dark sunspots(which were particularly active at the time) or a morning meteor shower.

“Flying Saucers” in Renaissance Art

Finally, several pieces of Renaissance art are frequently presented as containing “hidden” UAPs.

• The Madonna with Saint Giovannino (c. 15th century): This painting, attributed to the workshop of Domenico Ghirlandaio, hangs in the Palazzo Vecchio in Florence. In the sky over Mary’s shoulder, a small, dark, disc-shaped object is visible, seemingly with rays of light coming from it. On the ground below, a man and his dog are shown staring up at this object. This is often cited as a clear-as-day flying saucer.
• The Baptism of Christ (1710) by Aert de Gelder: This painting shows a large, disc-like object in the sky shining beams of light down on Jesus as he is being baptized.

Art historians find these interpretations to be based on a misunderstanding of religious iconography.

In The Madonna, the object is a common symbolic representation of the Annunciation to the Shepherds (from the Gospel of Luke). The “disc” is a stylized glowing cloud, a divine portal from which the angels announce the birth of Christ. The shepherd (the man with the dog) is shielding his eyes from its divine light. Such “glowing clouds” are a stock feature in religious art of the period, signifying a heavenly event.

In The Baptism of Christ, the “disc” is not a spaceship but a highly stylized, circular grouping of angels in a cloud. The “beams” are the light of heaven opening up, and in the center (often faded in reproductions) is the Dove, the symbol of the Holy Spirit, descending “like a dove” as described in the Gospel accounts. De Gelder, a student of Rembrandt, was using a creative and dramatic composition to depict a standard, well-known religious scene.

The Psychology and Context of Ancient Sightings

The debate over ancient UAP evidence ultimately hinges on context. The academic and scientific communities do not dispute the existence of the art, the artifacts, or the texts. They dispute the 21st-century interpretation that is projected onto them.

The theory of “ancient astronauts” itself has been heavily criticized by mainstream academia. Archaeologists and historians argue that it is often rooted in ethnocentrism. By suggesting that ancient non-European cultures (like the Egyptians, Maya, or Inca) could not have built their magnificent structures (like the pyramids or Puma Punku) without outside help, the theory implicitly denies their ingenuity and accomplishments.

Furthermore, the human brain is a pattern-recognition machine. We are hard-wired for pareidolia – to see faces in clouds, a “man in the moon,” or a helicopter in a jumble of hieroglyphs. When we are primed by our own culture’s narratives of alien visitation, we are more likely to find patterns that confirm that belief, an effect known as confirmation bias.

A useful analogy is the “cargo cult.” During and after World War II, isolated populations in Melanesia were exposed to advanced Western technology for the first time. They saw soldiers arrive in “great birds” (airplanes) that brought wondrous “cargo” (radios, processed food, medicine). When the war ended and the soldiers left, some of these groups developed cargo cults. They built symbolic “runways” from bamboo, carved “headphones” from wood, and performed “drills” in imitation of the soldiers, believing these rituals would magically summon the return of the cargo-bearing “gods.”

Ancient astronaut proponents use this as a direct model: ancient humans saw alien spacecraft, didn’t understand them, and built myths, religions, and artifacts to worship them.

The counter-argument is that this analogy is being applied in reverse. We have no independent evidence of the “cargo” (the alien visitation) in ancient times. It’s more likely that the myths (flying gods, chariots of fire) came first, as symbolic representations of spiritual concepts, and the art and rituals were then created to reflect those myths.

Summary

The search for unidentified aerial phenomena in antiquity is a compelling field of study that highlights a fundamental tension in how we view the past. It forces us to confront the vast differences in worldview, symbolism, and scientific understanding between our time and that of our ancestors.

The evidence presented by proponents – strange carvings, ambiguous artworks, and vivid textual descriptions of “fiery shields” or “wheels in the sky” – is real. These records exist. The debate is one ofinterpretation.

Are these artifacts and texts a “hidden history” of non-human contact, a record of physical, technological craft that ancient peoples witnessed and struggled to describe? This perspective remains a popular but unsubstantiated fringe theory, lacking the support of mainstream archaeology, history, and art history.

Or are these records a testament to the richness of the human imagination and the pre-scientific worldview? Are they symbolic depictions of powerful gods, culturally filtered interpretations of dramatic natural events, and metaphorical descriptions of significant spiritual experiences? This is the overwhelming academic consensus.

The phenomenon of “ancient UAP” interpretation may reveal less about our distant past and more about our present. It reflects a modern, technological society gazing back at its ancestors and, in their myths of gods from the sky, seeing a reflection of its own hopes, anxieties, and obsession with the final frontier.

Last update on 2025-12-20 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API