Who Possesses and Desires Sovereign Launch Capability?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Key Takeaways

• Thirteen countries have demonstrated proven orbital launch capability as of early 2026
• Geopolitical tensions are pushing more nations to fund domestic rocket programs
• Nations like Australia, Spain, Germany, and Canada are actively pursuing orbital launch

Introduction

The ability to place a satellite into orbit using a domestically built rocket represents one of the most demanding technical and industrial achievements a nation can pursue. It requires mastery across propulsion engineering, avionics, structural design, materials science, and complex systems integration. Unlike building a satellite, which dozens of countries can do, constructing an orbital launch vehicle and operating a spaceport demands a level of industrial capacity that relatively few nations have achieved.

As of February 2026, thirteen countries and one intergovernmental organization have demonstrated the ability to reach orbit with rockets of their own design. Several more are actively building toward that goal, with some closer than others. The motivations vary from national security to commercial ambition, but the underlying logic is consistent: access to orbit, on your own terms, from your own soil, provides a form of strategic independence that can’t be replicated by buying launches from another country.

This article covers each nation that has achieved sovereign orbital launch capability, the vehicles they fly, and the countries most likely to join the club in the years ahead.

What Sovereign Launch Capability Actually Means

Sovereign launch capability, in the context of space access, generally means a nation can develop, build, and operate a rocket capable of reaching orbit without depending on foreign hardware or launch services. The rocket doesn’t have to be the most powerful in the world, and the payload doesn’t have to be large. What matters is that the technology chain from design to launch exists entirely within a single nation’s borders, or is controlled by its nationals.

This definition has some nuance in practice. Some countries have achieved orbit using rockets developed primarily by their own industry, even if components were sourced internationally. Others use government-sponsored programs, while some have established this capability through commercially driven companies operating under their national flag. The European Space Agency (ESA) is a special case, representing a collective achievement shared across member states rather than any single country. New Zealand is another complexity: Rocket Lab is a US-incorporated company, but it conducts the majority of its launches from its private spaceport on the Māhia Peninsula in New Zealand, and some orbital tracking organizations count those launches under New Zealand’s tally.

Orbital launch is significantly harder than suborbital flight. A rocket reaching orbit must accelerate to roughly 28,000 kilometers per hour and maintain that velocity in a stable trajectory. The energy required, the precision of guidance systems, and the demands placed on propulsion make this a fundamentally different challenge from sending a rocket to the edge of space and back. Countries that have cracked this problem form a small and exclusive group.

The United States

The United States stands alone as the world’s dominant orbital launch nation. In 2025, US-based launch providers attempted 181 orbital launches, accounting for roughly 55% of all global attempts that year. The sheer scale of American launch activity is difficult to overstate.

The dominant force is SpaceX , which has made the Falcon 9 the most frequently flown orbital rocket in history. Standing 70 meters tall, the Falcon 9 uses liquid oxygen and RP-1 kerosene as propellants and can carry up to 22,800 kilograms to low Earth orbit (LEO). Its first stage is reusable, routinely landing on drone ships at sea or back at the launch site, which has dramatically reduced per-launch costs. By the end of 2025, SpaceX had not experienced a single Falcon 9 failure across an extraordinary launch cadence. The Falcon Heavy , which is effectively three Falcon 9 first stages strapped together, extends the company’s capability to the heavy-lift segment, able to carry approximately 63,800 kilograms to LEO.

SpaceX’s Starship represents the most ambitious rocket development effort in history. Standing roughly 121 meters tall when stacked on its Super Heavy booster, Starship is designed to be fully and rapidly reusable. The vehicle made significant test flight progress through 2024 and 2025, including catching the Super Heavy booster with mechanical arms at the launch tower in Texas. Starship is intended to carry over 100,000 kilograms to LEO and is central to both NASA’s Artemis lunar program and SpaceX’s own ambitions for Mars.

Blue Origin introduced its heavy-lift New Glenn rocket in 2025, flying twice that year. New Glenn uses liquid oxygen and liquified natural gas, stands 98 meters tall, and can carry approximately 45,000 kilograms to LEO. Its first stage is also designed to land and be reflown. United Launch Alliance (ULA) operates the Vulcan Centaur rocket and continues flying its legacy Atlas V . Rocket Lab, though US-incorporated, predominantly launches from New Zealand and is covered in that section.

Russia

Russia inherited the Soviet Union’s vast launch infrastructure and expertise when the USSR dissolved in 1991. For decades, Russian rockets were among the most reliable in the world, and the country served as the primary means of transporting astronauts to the International Space Station after the Space Shuttle retired. The Roscosmos state corporation oversees Russian space activities.

The Soyuz rocket family, which dates back to the 1960s, remained the workhorse of Russian space access in 2025. The Soyuz 2.1a and 2.1b variants account for the majority of Russian launches, carrying crew, cargo, and satellites. Standing 46.3 meters tall, the Soyuz 2.1a can carry around 6,800 kilograms to LEO from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome. It’s a deeply proven system with thousands of flights across its lineage.

The Proton-M heavy-lift rocket has largely phased out in recent years as Russia transitions to newer vehicles. The Angarafamily is intended to be its long-term replacement. The Angara 1.2 is a light-lift variant, while the Angara-A5 is a heavy-lift vehicle capable of placing roughly 24,500 kilograms to LEO. The Angara-A5 flew once in 2025, continuing a slow fielding pace that reflects broader challenges in Russia’s space industrial base. In 2025, Russia conducted 17 successful orbital launches, a rate that represents a sharp decline from pre-2016 activity levels when Russian launches routinely exceeded 30 per year. The impact of the Ukraine war on supply chains and workforce has been widely cited as a contributing factor.

China

China has become the world’s second-most-active orbital launch nation by a significant margin, conducting approximately 90 launch attempts in 2025 and growing its cadence year over year. The country’s space program is coordinated through multiple government and commercial entities, with the China National Space Administration (CNSA) serving as the civil government agency.

The primary launch vehicle family is the Long March series, operated by the state-owned China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC). This family spans a wide range of capabilities. The Long March 2D is a two-stage medium-lift rocket that flew frequently in 2025, while the Long March 3B handles geostationary missions. The Long March 5 is China’s heavy-lift workhorse, capable of carrying approximately 25,000 kilograms to LEO, and has been used for lunar and Mars missions. The Long March 7 handles cargo missions to China’s space station.

China’s commercial launch sector has grown rapidly. Galactic Energy’s Ceres-1 is a four-stage solid rocket capable of placing around 400 kilograms to LEO, and it led China’s commercial launch sector in 2025 by total flight count. LandSpace’s ZhuQue-2 is notable as the world’s first methane-fueled rocket to successfully reach orbit, using liquid methane and liquid oxygen. In late 2025, China flew the Long March 12A, a new two-stage methane and liquid oxygen vehicle standing 69 meters tall with a capacity of approximately 12,000 kilograms to LEO. China also operates sea-launch platforms, enabling launches from mobile positions in the ocean.

China’s Qianfan, Guowang, and other megaconstellation programs are driving a significant portion of the national launch cadence, drawing parallels to how SpaceX’s Starlink program shapes American launch activity.

Japan

Japan has one of the world’s most sophisticated space programs, with deep expertise in both scientific and commercial space activities. JAXA (the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) oversees national space efforts, while commercial entities are growing in prominence.

The H-IIA rocket has been Japan’s primary medium-to-heavy launch vehicle for over two decades. A two-stage liquid-propellant rocket, the H-IIA can carry up to 10,000 kilograms to LEO or around 4,000 kilograms to geostationary transfer orbit. By 2025, the H-IIA was nearing the end of its service life, with JAXA transitioning to its successor, the H3 rocket.

The H3 had a difficult start, failing on its first attempt in 2023, but successfully completed its second and subsequent test launches. The H3 is designed to be more cost-competitive than its predecessor, using a modular design that allows operators to configure the rocket for different payload sizes. It uses liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellants and can lift approximately 6,500 to 7,900 kilograms to sun-synchronous orbit depending on configuration.

Japan’s solid-fuel Epsilon rocket provides lighter-lift capability for smaller scientific payloads. Japan conducted four orbital launches in 2025. The commercial sector is also evolving, with companies like Space One developing small launch vehicles such as the Kairos rocket.

India

India’s space program has grown from a modest start in the 1980s into a globally recognized launch services provider. The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) manages national programs, and India has demonstrated the ability to conduct cost-effective missions that other nations have taken notice of.

The Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) has been the backbone of Indian launch capability for decades. A four-stage rocket alternating liquid and solid stages, the PSLV can carry around 3,800 kilograms to LEO or 1,750 kilograms to sun-synchronous orbit. It’s been used extensively for both domestic and international payloads and has an excellent reliability record.

The Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) extends India’s reach to geostationary transfer orbit with its cryogenic upper stage. The GSLV Mk II can carry around 2,500 kilograms to geostationary transfer orbit. India’s largest current rocket is the Launch Vehicle Mark 3 (LVM3), previously known as the GSLV Mk III. Standing 43.5 meters tall and using a combination of solid strap-on boosters, a liquid core stage, and a cryogenic upper stage, the LVM3 can carry approximately 8,000 kilograms to LEO. It launched an AST SpaceMobile BlueBird satellite in December 2025, demonstrating India’s growing role as a commercial launch services provider.

India conducted five orbital launches in 2025. ISRO is also developing the Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV) for rapid, low-cost deployment of smaller payloads.

France and the European Space Agency

France was once the fourth nation to achieve independent orbital launch capability, doing so in 1965. Today, French national launch capability is effectively channeled through the European Space Agency and Arianespace , which operate from the Guiana Space Centre in Kourou, French Guiana.

The Ariane 6 rocket made its long-awaited debut in 2024 and conducted additional flights in 2025. It comes in two configurations: Ariane 62 with two strap-on solid boosters and Ariane 64 with four. The Ariane 64 configuration can carry approximately 21,600 kilograms to LEO, making it a competitive heavy-lift option. The vehicle uses liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen for its main stage and upper stage, giving it the clean-burning characteristics preferred for many commercial and government missions.

The Vega-C light-lift rocket, developed primarily by Italy within the ESA framework, suffered a failure in 2022 but returned to flight in 2024. It can carry approximately 2,350 kilograms to sun-synchronous orbit and fills a different market segment than Ariane 6. Europe conducted seven successful orbital launches in 2025, a count that modestly improved from earlier years as Ariane 6 ramped up its cadence.

Israel

Israel developed its orbital launch capability in the 1980s and faces a geographic constraint that no other launch nation deals with in the same way: it launches westward, over the Mediterranean Sea, against the direction of Earth’s rotation. This retrograde launch approach costs payload capacity but is necessary because launching eastward would send debris over neighboring states. The Shavit rocket is Israel’s orbital launch vehicle, a solid-fuel three-stage rocket developed and operated by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). Due to the retrograde trajectory penalty, its effective payload to LEO is relatively modest at around 300 kilograms for low-altitude orbits.

Israel has used the Shavit to place its Ofek series of reconnaissance satellites into orbit, and the program is closely linked to national defense priorities. A single Israeli orbital launch was recorded in 2025. Israel is also developing more advanced satellite systems, and there are ongoing discussions about whether future vehicles might offer greater performance.

Iran

Iran joined the orbital launch club in 2009, becoming the first country in the Middle East to develop an independent orbital launch capability. The Iranian Space Agency and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps both operate launch programs, creating a program with both civilian and military dimensions.

The Safir rocket was Iran’s original orbital vehicle, a two-stage liquid-propellant rocket derived from ballistic missile technology. It placed small research satellites into low Earth orbit. The Qased rocket is a newer system that has been used to launch Noor military satellites for the Revolutionary Guard. Qased uses a ballistic missile first stage with a new upper stage and has successfully orbited multiple payloads. Iran also announced and tested the Qaem series, solid-propellant vehicles capable of rapid preparation and launch.

In 2025, Iran conducted one confirmed orbital launch attempt, with the country’s programs remaining primarily focused on military satellite deployment rather than commercial activities. Iran’s program draws significant international scrutiny due to the dual-use nature of ballistic missile and space launch technologies.

North Korea

North Korea has claimed satellite launches dating back to the late 1990s, but its first confirmed successful orbital insertion did not occur until November 2023, when the Chollima-1 rocket placed the Malligyong-1 reconnaissance satellite into orbit. This represented a significant milestone for the country’s space and missile programs.

The Chollima-1 is a two-stage liquid-propellant rocket developed by the National Aerospace Development Administration (NADA). North Korea has stated intentions to place additional reconnaissance satellites in orbit, and the program is widely viewed as a military initiative tightly connected to the country’s ballistic missile development. International sanctions and geopolitical isolation make independent verification of technical details difficult. North Korea’s program is driven by defense imperatives rather than any commercial or scientific agenda, and it operates entirely outside the international norms that govern most civil space programs.

South Korea

South Korea entered the orbital launch club in June 2022 with the second launch of the Nuri rocket, also known as the Korea Space Launch Vehicle-II (KSLV-II). The country had made an earlier attempt in 2013 with the KSLV-I, but that vehicle used a Russian first stage and didn’t count as a fully sovereign capability.

Nuri is a three-stage rocket that uses liquid oxygen and kerosene propellants throughout. Standing 47.2 meters tall, it can carry approximately 2,600 kilograms to a 600-kilometer sun-synchronous orbit. Nuri was developed by the Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) with significant involvement from the Korean domestic aerospace industry. The third launch in 2023 successfully placed multiple satellites into orbit, confirming the rocket’s operational status.

South Korea conducted two orbital launches in 2025. The country is also home to a growing commercial launch sector. Innospace, a private South Korean launch company, made its first orbital launch attempt in December 2025 using the Hanbit-Nano rocket, a hybrid-propellant small launch vehicle that lifted off from the Alcantara Launch Center in Brazil.

New Zealand

New Zealand’s place among orbital-capable nations reflects Rocket Lab’s operations at the Māhia Peninsula. Rocket Lab is a US-incorporated company, but it was co-founded by a New Zealander, operates its primary launch site in New Zealand, and has been assigned New Zealand’s orbital tally by several tracking organizations.

The Electron rocket is a small launch vehicle standing 18 meters tall and designed to carry payloads of up to 300 kilograms to LEO. It uses liquid oxygen and RP-1 kerosene in its Rutherford engines, which are notable for being among the first rocket engines with components produced using metal 3D printing. Rocket Lab conducted 17 Electron launches from Māhia in 2025, an impressive cadence for a small launch vehicle. The company is also developing the medium-lift Neutron rocket, which is expected to carry approximately 13,000 kilograms to LEO and feature a reusable first stage. As Neutron develops, its primary launch site is expected to be in the United States.

The United Kingdom

Britain was the third country to achieve independent orbital launch capability, launching its Prospero satellite on a Black Arrow rocket in 1971. The program was canceled almost immediately after that single success, and the UK has not independently orbited a payload since. A renewed effort to restore British sovereign access suffered a major setback in February 2026.

Orbex , the Scottish launch startup that had been developing the Prime small orbital rocket, filed a notice of intention to appoint administrators on February 11, 2026, formally entering insolvency proceedings equivalent to Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The company had spent years developing Prime, a bio-propane and liquid oxygen rocket designed to carry up to 200 kilograms to sun-synchronous orbit from a site in northern Scotland. Despite receiving approximately £26 million in UK government-backed loans and being selected as one of five winners of ESA’s European Launcher Challenge, Orbex could not secure its Series D funding round or complete a planned acquisition by French space startup The Exploration Company. Its Danish rocket engine subsidiary had already shut down in January 2026, costing around 90 jobs. The Scottish operation’s collapse puts a further 150 jobs at risk.

In the immediate aftermath, UK-based Skyrora announced it was exploring an offer for select Orbex assets, including an interest in the Sutherland Spaceport site in northern Scotland. Skyrora is developing its own orbital launch vehicle, the Skyrora XL, designed to carry 315 kilograms to LEO. Whether the UK can salvage its spaceport ambitions through Skyrora or another vehicle remains an open question as of early 2026. The broader UK launch program had invested heavily in spaceport development at multiple sites, and that infrastructure doesn’t disappear with Orbex, but the most developed domestic orbital vehicle program in the country has collapsed.

Australia

Australia came close to becoming a confirmed orbital launch nation in 2025. Gilmour Space Technologies , a Queensland-based company, conducted the maiden test of its Eris rocket in July 2025 from the Bowen Orbital Spaceport in North Queensland. An anomaly occurred during the flight, preventing a successful orbital insertion, but the test confirmed the company’s ability to develop high-thrust hybrid propulsion technology and operate domestic launch infrastructure.

Eris Block 1 is designed to carry up to 215 kilograms to a 500-kilometer sun-synchronous orbit. The rocket uses a hybrid propulsion system, burning a proprietary solid fuel with liquid oxidizer in a three-stage configuration. Gilmour Space is planning an Eris Block 2 with improved performance, roughly comparable to the Firefly Alpha in capability. A potential Eris Heavy has also been discussed for medium-lift ambitions.

The Australian government has actively supported the development of domestic launch capacity through regulatory frameworks and funding mechanisms, viewing it as part of a broader national security and economic strategy. Australia’s geographic advantages, including launch azimuths that avoid most populated areas and proximity to equatorial and polar orbits, make it an attractive location for both domestic and international launch operations.

Spain

Spain’s path to sovereign orbital launch runs through PLD Space , a private company based in Elche. The company has developed the Miura 1 suborbital rocket and is working to complete the Miura 5 orbital vehicle. Miura 5 is a liquid-propellant two-stage rocket designed to carry approximately 450 kilograms to a 500-kilometer sun-synchronous orbit.

PLD Space has secured more than €120 million in funding, including substantial backing from the Spanish government’s PERTE Aeroespacial program. Commercial launches from Miura 5 are planned to begin in late 2026, with launches expected from the Guiana Space Centre in French Guiana. PLD Space was also among the five companies selected by ESA’s European Launcher Challenge program in mid-2025, with framework contracts expected in 2026. The Spanish government views sovereign launch as an industrial and strategic priority, and PLD Space has become one of the most closely watched European NewSpace companies.

Germany

Germany doesn’t have a national launch vehicle history in the same sense as Russia or China, having operated through ESA for decades. But the country’s commercial launch sector has grown rapidly, with companies like Isar Aerospace and Rocket Factory Augsburg (RFA) receiving significant government and private investment.

Isar Aerospace is developing the Spectrum rocket, a two-stage liquid oxygen and kerosene vehicle designed to carry up to 1,000 kilograms to LEO. The company conducted an initial test launch from a Norwegian launch facility in early 2026, gathering valuable flight data despite the rocket not surviving the flight. RFA is developing the RFA ONE rocket, a two-stage vehicle using liquid oxygen and kerosene with an ambition of high reusability. Both Isar and RFA were among the five companies selected for ESA’s European Launcher Challenge, which requires a demonstrated successful orbital launch by 2027 to confirm eligibility for ESA procurement commitments through 2030. Germany views both companies as anchors for a broader NewSpace ecosystem within the EU, and federal funding has flowed accordingly. Neither vehicle had achieved a confirmed orbital insertion as of February 2026, but both programs were actively testing hardware and preparing for further attempts.

Brazil

Brazil has one of the oldest space programs in the developing world, operating the Alcantara Launch Center , which sits close to the equator and offers excellent orbital access for a wide range of inclinations. The Brazilian Space Agency(AEB) has been developing the VLM (Veículo Lançador de Microsatélites) rocket for years, working toward a sovereign small-satellite launch capacity.

The VLM is a three-stage solid-propellant rocket designed to carry approximately 150 kilograms to an 800-kilometer orbit. It draws on heritage from Brazil’s VS-30 sounding rocket program and the larger VSB-30 that powers successful suborbital research flights. Delays have pushed the VLM’s first orbital launch attempt back multiple times.

Alcantara’s near-equatorial location makes Brazil an attractive host for foreign launch operations, and the country has existing partnerships that allow other nations’ rockets to operate from the site. South Korea’s Innospace used Alcantara for its Hanbit-Nano orbital attempt in December 2025, and the spaceport continues to serve as a viable launch site even as Brazil’s own orbital vehicle program moves slowly.

Canada

Canada has historically relied on foreign launch services for its satellites, but a focused effort is now underway to change that. The centrepiece of Canada’s sovereign launch ambitions is Spaceport Nova Scotia , a commercial orbital launch complex being developed by Maritime Launch Services near Canso on Nova Scotia’s Atlantic coast. The spaceport’s near-polar location provides access to a wide range of orbital inclinations from a single site, making it attractive to both domestic and international customers.

In late 2025, the project received significant financial backing. MDA Space , Canada’s premier space technology company, made a $10 million equity investment in Maritime Launch in November 2025, becoming a strategic operational partner. Export Development Canada had separately committed $10 million in senior credit facilities in October 2025, and the Province of Nova Scotia approved over $10 million in infrastructure reimbursement funding. The combined investment signals genuine institutional commitment to the project rather than just early-stage enthusiasm.

The rocket intended to fly from Spaceport Nova Scotia is being developed by Reaction Dynamics (RDX), a Montreal-based launch company. In August 2025, Maritime Launch and Reaction Dynamics signed a Pathfinder Launch Agreement paving the way for what would be Canada’s first orbital launch of a domestically designed and built rocket from Canadian soil. The target date for that orbital attempt is around the third quarter of 2028. Canada’s pathway to orbit is still several years away from completion, but the financial and institutional infrastructure now in place represents the most serious national commitment to sovereign launch the country has made. Geopolitical pressures, particularly concerns about over-reliance on US launch providers, are widely acknowledged as motivating the push.

Turkey

Turkey’s space ambitions have been outlined in its national space program, managed by the Turkish Space Agency(TUA). The country has stated goals of developing sovereign orbital launch capability, with Roketsan , Turkey’s primary missile and rocket manufacturer, leading the technical development effort.

Turkey has invested heavily in propulsion research and has developed increasingly capable solid-propellant motors through its defense programs. The pathway to orbit from a Turkish rocket is still in the development stages, with a target orbital launch date that remains aspirational rather than confirmed for the near term. Turkey has launched satellites on foreign vehicles and sees domestic launch as a longer-term strategic objective.

The Broader Picture

The list of countries pursuing sovereign launch reflects a structural shift in how governments think about space access. For decades, smaller nations were content to buy launch services from the US, Russia, or Europe. Geopolitical instability, demonstrated by events like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and rising tensions in other regions, has changed that calculation. When international relationships sour, access to foreign launch services can evaporate quickly.

Nations that rely entirely on foreign rockets for their satellite programs, including everything from weather monitoring to military communications, face vulnerability that pure financial analysis doesn’t capture. This has pushed countries that might never have funded domestic rocket development on economic grounds alone to justify such programs on national security grounds.

The Orbex collapse in the UK is a reminder that building an orbital launch company from scratch is genuinely hard and expensive. The company had government backing, ESA selection, and years of technical work behind it, yet still couldn’t bridge the funding gap. It won’t be the last company to face this challenge. Australia’s Gilmour Space, Spain’s PLD Space, Germany’s Isar Aerospace and RFA, and Canada’s Reaction Dynamics are all in different phases of that same difficult journey, and each faces its own version of the capital intensity problem that ended Orbex.

At the same time, the commercial rocket revolution pioneered by SpaceX has shown that launch vehicles don’t have to be built by government contractors following slow procurement processes. Private companies with venture capital and government contracts can iterate quickly, accept risk, and potentially reach orbit at a fraction of traditional program costs. This model has inspired new national programs in Australia, Spain, Germany, and Canada, where governments are funding private launch startups rather than building government-owned rockets from scratch.

The gap between the established launch nations and the aspiring ones is still significant, but it’s narrowing. A decade ago, a country with no orbital launch history could expect to spend ten to fifteen years and several billion dollars working toward that goal. Today’s commercial aerospace tools, manufacturing techniques, and more freely available research have compressed that timeline somewhat, even if success is far from guaranteed. Rockets remain deeply unforgiving of engineering mistakes, and every country currently working toward orbit has had to grapple with failures, delays, and the fundamental difficulty of controlled explosions pointed at the sky.

What’s clear is that the orbital launch club, once a small group of superpowers and their closest allies, is expanding. The nature of that expansion, driven by a mix of strategic anxiety, national pride, and commercial ambition, will shape the structure of the space economy for decades to come. Countries that establish their own launch infrastructure now will be better positioned to field satellite constellations, participate in lunar and planetary programs, and offer launch services to others who still lack the capability.

Summary

Thirteen countries have demonstrated proven orbital launch capability as of early 2026, led by the United States and China, which together account for roughly 83% of all annual orbital attempts. Russia, Japan, India, France through ESA, Israel, Iran, North Korea, South Korea, and New Zealand round out the confirmed group, each with vehicles tailored to their strategic and commercial priorities. Nations including Australia, Spain, Germany, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Canada, and Turkey are actively working to join this group, investing in domestic rocket companies and national spaceport infrastructure. The UK suffered a setback when Orbex entered administration in February 2026, though Skyrora has expressed interest in acquiring its assets. Canada has made meaningful progress with investments in Spaceport Nova Scotia and a pathfinder agreement with Reaction Dynamics targeting a first orbital attempt around 2028. The coming years will determine which of the aspiring nations successfully cross the threshold into confirmed orbital launch status, and whether the cost and reliabilityvements pioneered by commercial launch pioneers begin to diffuse more widely across the global launch landscape.

10 Best-Selling Books About Elon Musk

Elon Musk

Walter Isaacson’s biography follows Elon Musk’s life from his upbringing in South Africa through the building of PayPal, SpaceX, Tesla, and other ventures. The book focuses on decision-making under pressure, engineering-driven management, risk tolerance, and the interpersonal dynamics that shaped Musk’s companies and public persona, drawing a continuous timeline from early influences to recent business and product cycles.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

Ashlee Vance presents a narrative biography that links Musk’s personal history to the founding and scaling of Tesla and SpaceX. The book emphasizes product ambition, factory and launch-site realities, leadership style, and the operational constraints behind headline achievements. It also covers setbacks, funding pressures, and the management choices that made Musk both influential in technology and controversial in public life.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Liftoff: Elon Musk and the Desperate Early Days That Launched SpaceX

Eric Berger reconstructs SpaceX’s earliest phase, when technical failures, schedule slips, and financing risk threatened the company’s survival. The book centers on Musk’s role as founder and chief decision-maker while highlighting engineers, mission teams, and launch operations. Readers get a detailed account of how early launch campaigns, investor expectations, and engineering tradeoffs shaped SpaceX’s culture and trajectory.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Reentry: SpaceX, Elon Musk, and the Reusable Rockets That Launched a Second Space Age

Also by Eric Berger, this book explains how SpaceX pushed reusable rocketry from uncertain experiments into repeatable operations. It tracks the technical, financial, and organizational choices behind landing attempts, iterative design changes, and reliability improvements. Musk is presented as a central driver of deadlines and risk posture, while the narrative stays grounded in how teams translated high-level direction into hardware and flight outcomes.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Power Play: Tesla, Elon Musk, and the Bet of the Century

Tim Higgins examines Tesla’s transformation from a niche automaker into a mass-production contender, with Musk as the primary strategist and public face. The book covers internal conflict, production bottlenecks, financing stress, executive turnover, and the consequences of making manufacturing speed a defining business strategy. It reads as a business history of Tesla that ties corporate governance and product decisions directly to Musk’s leadership approach.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Insane Mode: How Elon Musk’s Tesla Sparked an Electric Revolution

Hamish McKenzie tells Tesla’s story through the lens of product launches, market skepticism, and the organizational strain of rapid scaling. Musk appears as both brand amplifier and operational catalyst, while the narrative highlights the role of teams and supply chains in making electric vehicles mainstream. The book is written for nontechnical readers who want context on EV adoption, Tesla’s business model, and Musk’s influence on expectations in the auto industry.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors

Edward Niedermeyer offers an investigative look at Tesla’s early and mid-stage growth, emphasizing the tension between engineering reality, marketing narratives, and investor expectations. Musk’s leadership is examined alongside product delays, quality concerns, and strategic messaging, with attention to how a high-profile CEO can shape both market perception and internal priorities. The result is a critical business narrative focused on what it took to keep Tesla expanding.

VIEW ON AMAZON

SpaceX: Elon Musk and the Final Frontier

Brad Bergan presents an accessible overview of SpaceX’s development and its place in the modern space industry, with Musk as the central figure connecting financing, engineering goals, and public messaging. The book describes major programs, launch milestones, and the economic logic of lowering launch costs. It also situates Musk’s influence within the broader ecosystem of government contracts, commercial customers, and competitive pressure.

VIEW ON AMAZON

The Elon Musk Method: Business Principles from the World’s Most Powerful Entrepreneur

Randy Kirk frames Musk as a case study in execution, product focus, and decision-making speed, translating observed patterns into general business lessons. The book discusses leadership behaviors, hiring expectations, prioritization, and the use of aggressive timelines, while keeping the focus on how Musk’s style affects organizational output. It is positioned for readers interested in entrepreneurship and management practices associated with Musk-led companies.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Elon Musk: A Mission to Save the World

Anna Crowley Redding provides a biography-style account that emphasizes Musk’s formative experiences and the stated motivations behind Tesla and SpaceX. The book presents his career as a sequence of high-stakes projects, explaining how big technical goals connect to business choices and public visibility. It is written in clear language for general readers who want a straightforward narrative of Musk’s life, work, and the controversies that follow disruptive companies.

VIEW ON AMAZON

10 Best-Selling SpaceX Books

Liftoff: Elon Musk and the Desperate Early Days That Launched SpaceX

This narrative-driven SpaceX history focuses on the company’s earliest, most uncertain years, following the engineering, leadership, and operational decisions behind the first Falcon 1 attempts. It emphasizes how tight budgets, launch failures, and rapid iteration shaped SpaceX’s culture and set the foundation for later achievements in commercial spaceflight and reusable rockets.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Reentry: SpaceX, Elon Musk, and the Reusable Rockets that Launched a Second Space Age

Centered on the push to land and reuse orbital-class boosters, this book explains how SpaceX turned Falcon 9 reusability from a risky concept into a repeatable operational system. It connects engineering tradeoffs, test failures, launch cadence, and business pressure into a clear account of how reuse affected pricing, reliability, and the modern launch market.

VIEW ON AMAZON

SpaceX: Making Commercial Spaceflight a Reality

Written in an accessible explanatory style, this overview links SpaceX’s design philosophy to outcomes such as simpler manufacturing, vertically integrated production, and faster development cycles. It also frames how NASA partnerships and fixed-price contracting helped reshape the U.S. launch industry, with SpaceX as a central example of commercial spaceflight becoming routine.

VIEW ON AMAZON

SpaceX: Starship to Mars – The First 20 Years

This SpaceX book places Starship in the broader arc of the company’s first two decades, tying early Falcon programs to the scale of fully reusable systems. It explains why Starship’s architecture differs from Falcon 9, what has to change to support high flight rates, and how long-duration goals like Mars transport drive requirements for heat shields, engines, and rapid turnaround.

VIEW ON AMAZON

SpaceX’s Dragon: America’s Next Generation Spacecraft

Focusing on the Dragon spacecraft family, this account explains capsule design choices, cargo and crew mission needs, and how spacecraft operations differ from rocket operations. It provides a readable path through docking, life-support constraints, recovery logistics, and reliability considerations that matter when transporting people and supplies to orbit through NASA-linked programs.

VIEW ON AMAZON

SpaceX: Elon Musk and the Final Frontier

This photo-rich SpaceX history uses visuals and concise text to trace milestones from early launches to newer systems, making it suitable for readers who want context without technical density. It highlights facilities, vehicles, and mission highlights while explaining how Falcon 9, Dragon, and Starship fit into SpaceX’s long-term strategy in the private space industry.

VIEW ON AMAZON

SpaceX From The Ground Up: 7th Edition

Designed as a structured guide, this book summarizes SpaceX vehicles, launch sites, and mission progression in a reference-friendly format. It is especially useful for readers who want a clear overview of Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Dragon variants, and Starship development context, with an emphasis on how launch services and cadence influence SpaceX’s market position.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Rocket Billionaires: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and the New Space Race

This industry narrative explains how SpaceX emerged alongside other private space efforts, showing how capital, contracts, and competitive pressure influenced design and launch decisions. SpaceX appears as a recurring anchor point as the book covers the shift from government-dominated space activity to a market where reusable rockets and rapid development cycles reshape expectations.

VIEW ON AMAZON

The Space Barons: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and the Quest to Colonize the Cosmos

This book compares leadership styles and program choices across major private space players, with SpaceX as a principal thread in the story. It connects SpaceX’s execution pace to broader outcomes such as launch market disruption, NASA partnership models, and the changing economics of access to orbit, offering a balanced, journalistic view for nontechnical readers.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Space Race 2.0: SpaceX, Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, NASA, and the Privatization of the Final Frontier

This wide-angle look at privatized space activity places SpaceX within an ecosystem of competitors, partners, and regulators. It clarifies how NASA procurement, launch infrastructure, and commercial passenger and cargo missions intersect, while showing how SpaceX’s approach to reuse and production scale helped define expectations for the modern commercial spaceflight era.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Appendix: Top 10 Questions Answered in This Article

How many countries currently have sovereign orbital launch capability?

As of early 2026, thirteen countries and one intergovernmental organization have demonstrated proven orbital launch capability. These include the United States, Russia, China, Japan, India, France through ESA, Israel, Iran, North Korea, South Korea, and New Zealand among others. The group has grown gradually since the Soviet Union first reached orbit in 1957.

Which country launches the most rockets each year?

The United States leads global orbital launch activity by a wide margin, conducting approximately 181 orbital launch attempts in 2025, representing roughly 55% of all global attempts. The vast majority of US launches are conducted by SpaceX using its Falcon 9 rocket. China is a distant second with roughly 90 launches in 2025.

What makes orbital launch so much harder than suborbital flight?

Reaching orbit requires accelerating a vehicle to approximately 28,000 kilometers per hour and maintaining that velocity in a stable circular or elliptical path around Earth. Suborbital flight only needs to overcome gravity temporarily, requiring far less energy and precision. The engineering demands, guidance requirements, and structural loads involved in reaching orbit are fundamentally different from anything required for a suborbital trajectory.

What happened to UK rocket company Orbex?

Orbex filed a notice of intention to appoint administrators on February 11, 2026, entering insolvency proceedings after exhausting options for new investment, mergers, and acquisition. Its Danish rocket engine subsidiary had already filed for bankruptcy in January 2026. Despite receiving approximately £26 million in UK government loans and selection for ESA’s European Launcher Challenge, the company could not close its Series D funding round or complete a planned takeover by The Exploration Company.

What is Canada doing to achieve sovereign launch capability?

Canada is developing Spaceport Nova Scotia through Maritime Launch Services near Canso on the Atlantic coast, backed by investments from MDA Space, Export Development Canada, and the Province of Nova Scotia totaling over $30 million committed in late 2025. Montreal-based Reaction Dynamics signed a Pathfinder Launch Agreement with Maritime Launch in August 2025, targeting Canada’s first orbital launch of a domestically built rocket around the third quarter of 2028. The program is driven by both national security concerns and commercial ambitions.

Why does Israel launch its rockets westward?

Israel launches westward, against the direction of Earth’s rotation, to avoid sending rocket debris over neighboring states. This retrograde launch trajectory costs payload capacity compared to eastward launches but is a geographic necessity given Israel’s regional situation. No other orbital launch nation faces the same constraint in the same way.

Which countries are closest to joining the orbital launch club?

Australia, Spain, and Germany are the most advanced nations currently working toward their first confirmed orbital launches as of early 2026. Australia’s Gilmour Space conducted a maiden Eris rocket test in July 2025, Spain’s PLD Space is targeting commercial Miura 5 launches for late 2026, and German companies Isar Aerospace and Rocket Factory Augsburg are actively testing hardware and competing under ESA’s European Launcher Challenge.

What is China’s most capable current rocket?

The Long March 5 is China’s primary heavy-lift rocket, capable of delivering approximately 25,000 kilograms to low Earth orbit. It has been used for China’s lunar exploration missions, Mars mission, and space station modules. China also flew the newer Long March 12A in late 2025, a methane-fueled heavy-lift vehicle with a 12,000-kilogram LEO capacity.

Why are more countries pursuing sovereign launch capability now?

Geopolitical instability has highlighted the risks of depending on foreign launch providers for satellite services. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine demonstrated that international partnerships can collapse quickly, cutting off access to launch services, and rising tensions elsewhere reinforce those concerns. Many governments now treat domestic launch capability as a national security requirement rather than a purely commercial consideration, driving new investment in domestic rocket programs.

What is India’s most capable orbital launch vehicle?

India’s most capable current rocket is the Launch Vehicle Mark 3 (LVM3), which can carry approximately 8,000 kilograms to low Earth orbit using solid strap-on boosters, a liquid-propellant core stage, and a cryogenic upper stage. The LVM3 has been used for both domestic missions and commercial satellite launches for international customers, including an AST SpaceMobile satellite deployment in December 2025. India’s competitive pricing and growing reliability record have positioned ISRO as a credible commercial launch services provider.