Ensuring Safety and Enabling Rescue in Artemis Missions: Insights from the 1971 NASA Study “Lunar Mission Safety and Rescue”

The vast expanse of space, with its inherent challenges and unknowns, has always posed significant risks to human exploration. As we venture further into the cosmos, particularly with ambitious programs like Artemis aiming to establish a sustainable presence on the Moon, ensuring the safety of astronauts and having robust rescue plans become paramount.

The 1971 Study: Context and Scope

The 1971 study was rooted in the ambition of the IPP, which aimed to expand human activities on the Moon beyond the Apollo missions. This included establishing an orbiting lunar station, conducting extensive surface exploration, and setting up regular logistics and crew rotation flights between Earth and the Moon. The study’s primary objective was to establish guidelines for enhancing safety in these advanced lunar missions.

The study was divided into two major tasks:

1. Hazards Analysis: This involved identifying and analyzing potential hazards, their effects, and countermeasures. It also aimed to identify situations that might necessitate rescue missions and recommend safety technology developments.
2. Escape/Rescue Analysis: This focused on developing escape, survival, and rescue mission requirements,techniques, and concepts. The culmination of this task was the formulation of a comprehensive lunar mission rescue plan.

The study was constrained to the lunar sphere of influence and missions within the 1980 timeframe. It assumed that the design and internal operations of major IPP elements were optimized and didn’t require further hazard analysis. The study also relied heavily on the results of the Apollo missions, particularly 11, 12, and 14.

Key Findings and Recommendations

The 1971 study identified a wide array of hazards and escape/rescue situations. It proposed over 200 safety guidelines and recommendations, developed escape/survival/rescue concepts, and formulated a detailed lunar mission rescue plan. Some of the key findings and recommendations are summarized below.

Hazards

The study categorized hazards into several groups, including:

• Explosion/Implosion: Risks associated with high-pressure gas storage, pyrotechnics, and experimental devices.
• Fire: Potential for fire onboard spacecraft and lunar bases.
• Pressure Excursions: Hazards related to loss of cabin atmosphere or sudden decompression.
• Collision: Risks of collision in lunar orbit and on the lunar surface.
• Contamination: Threats posed by contamination of cabin atmosphere or spacesuits.
• Illness/Injury: Risks to astronauts’ health and well-being.
• Personnel Isolation: Situations where crew members might become isolated from their spacecraft or base.
• Motions/Accelerations: Hazards associated with excessive motion or acceleration.
• Human Error: Potential for errors by astronauts leading to accidents.
• Hostile Environment: Challenges posed by the lunar environment, such as radiation and meteoroids.
• Radiological Hazards: Risks associated with nuclear power systems.
• System or Subsystem Malfunctions: Potential failures of spacecraft or base systems.

For each hazard identified, the study proposed specific safety guidelines and requirements. For instance, to mitigate the risk of fire, the study recommended using non-flammable materials in spacecraft and lunar base design and providing a two-gas atmosphere.

Escape/Rescue

The study emphasized the importance of providing astronauts with the capability to escape to a permanent safe haven. It also recognized the need for rescue provisions in situations where self-help might not be possible. The study proposed a comprehensive escape/rescue plan, which included:

• Vehicles and Equipment: The plan identified the need for dedicated rescue vehicles, such as tugs with a high delta-V capability and 14-day life support, and specialized rescue equipment like portable airlocks and pressurized stretchers.
• Deployment: The plan outlined the strategic deployment of rescue vehicles and equipment in lunar orbit and on the lunar surface.
• Operations: The plan detailed escape/rescue operations for various scenarios, including lunar orbit arrival and departure, lunar orbital operations, and lunar surface operations.

The study also highlighted the critical time spans for escape/survival/rescue, which were found to be 12 hours and 14 days. It emphasized the need for providing astronauts with sufficient survival provisions, such as pressure suits,backpacks, and emergency pressure garments, to last for these durations.

Implications for Research

The 1971 study identified several areas where research or technology development could enhance safety in future lunar missions. These included:

• Developing integrated suit and backpack designs for increased mobility and safety.
• Developing pressure suits that operate at higher pressures to eliminate the need for denitrogenization.
• Developing means for safely switching backpacks during EVA.
• Developing methods for detecting and repairing spacesuit leaks.
• Improving navigation and obstacle avoidance techniques for lunar rovers and flyers.
• Developing means for detecting hidden cavities or surface weaknesses on the Moon.
• Studying the dynamics of lunar landing for improved safety.

Relevance to the Artemis Program

The Artemis program, with its goal of establishing a long-term human presence on the Moon, faces many of the same challenges and hazards identified in the 1971 study. The insights and recommendations from this study, therefore, remain highly relevant today.

Some of the key takeaways from the 1971 study that are particularly pertinent to Artemis are:

• Emphasis on EVA Safety: The study’s emphasis on minimizing the risks associated with EVA is crucial for Artemis, as astronauts will be conducting extensive EVA activities on the lunar surface. The recommendations for improved spacesuit design, backpack technology, and EVA procedures are directly applicable to Artemis.
• Need for Robust Rescue Plans: The study’s comprehensive escape/rescue plan, with its focus on providing astronauts with the capability to escape to a safe haven and the provision for external rescue when necessary, is a valuable model for Artemis mission planners.
• Importance of Technology Development: The study’s identification of areas for research and technology development highlights the need for continued innovation to enhance safety in lunar missions. Artemis will benefit from advancements in spacesuit technology, navigation aids, and emergency equipment.
• Crew Training and Human Factors: The study’s emphasis on crew training and the consideration of human factors in mission planning is crucial for Artemis. Astronauts will need to be well-trained in all aspects of the mission, including emergency procedures, and mission planners will need to carefully consider the physical and psychological demands of long-duration lunar missions.

Summary

The 1971 “Lunar Mission Safety and Rescue” study provides a wealth of knowledge and insights that remain invaluable for future lunar exploration endeavors, particularly the Artemis program. The study’s comprehensive analysis of hazards,its detailed escape/rescue plan, and its recommendations for research and technology development offer a solid foundation for ensuring the safety and success of Artemis missions.

Download