Lunar Landings: Past, Present, and Future

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

One Giant Leap Revisited

For millennia, the Moon has been a constant in the human experience—a silent, silver companion in the night sky, a source of myth, a measure of time, and an object of scientific curiosity. It was a destination that existed only in the realm of imagination until the mid-20th century, when a unique confluence of technological advancement and geopolitical rivalry transformed it into a tangible goal. The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union provided the political will and immense resources needed to turn the dream of lunar travel into reality, culminating in the historic Apollo landings.

That era was a fleeting moment. After just a few years of human footprints on the lunar dust, the Moon fell silent again, visited only by a handful of robotic emissaries for decades. Now, more than half a century after the last Apollo mission, humanity is looking to the Moon once more. This new chapter is starkly different from the first. It’s no longer a race between two superpowers but a complex, multipolar endeavor involving a host of nations and, for the first time, ambitious private companies. Driven by new scientific discoveries, the promise of valuable resources, and the long-term goal of reaching Mars, a new generation is preparing to return to the Moon—this time, with the intention to stay. This is the story of how we first reached for the Moon, why we left, and how we are now poised to begin our lunar future.

The First Space Race: A Duel for the Heavens

The dawn of the Space Age was not born from a pure desire for scientific exploration, but from the crucible of the Cold War. The launch of the Soviet satellite Sputnik 1 in 1957 sent shockwaves through the United States, igniting a fierce competition for technological and ideological supremacy. The Moon quickly became the ultimate prize in this contest. Before humans could even dream of setting foot on another world, a series of robotic pioneers had to pave the way. These early uncrewed missions were a high-stakes, high-risk duel fought with rockets and radio signals, a period of breathtaking firsts and heartbreaking failures that provided the essential knowledge for the human voyages to come.

The Soviet Union’s Robotic Vanguard

In the opening years of the space race, the Soviet Union established a commanding lead with its Luna programme, a series of robotic probes that consistently achieved monumental “firsts” in lunar exploration. This relentless pace of innovation, managed by the enigmatic Chief Designer Sergei Korolev, repeatedly captured the world’s attention and placed immense pressure on the fledgling American space program. The Luna missions represented a methodical progression of capabilities, starting with simple spacecraft designed to just reach the Moon and evolving into sophisticated landers, rovers, and automated sample-return vehicles that were decades ahead of their time. Though many of the early attempts failed—often unacknowledged publicly—the successes were spectacular and served as powerful demonstrations of Soviet technological prowess.

Luna 1, 2, and 3: The First Encounters

The story of humanity’s physical reach to the Moon began on January 2, 1959, with the launch of Luna 1. Originally intended to be an impactor, a guidance system malfunction caused it to miss its target by about 6,000 kilometers. This “failure,” however, resulted in a string of historic achievements. Luna 1, nicknamed “Mechta” (Dream), became the first human-made object to escape Earth’s gravity, the first to fly past the Moon, and the first to enter a heliocentric orbit, becoming an artificial planet circling the Sun.

During its 34-hour flight, Luna 1’s scientific instruments, including a magnetometer, Geiger counter, and micrometeorite detector, made foundational discoveries. It provided the first direct measurements of the solar wind, a continuous stream of charged particles flowing from the Sun, and made the startling discovery that the Moon possessed no detectable magnetic field. These findings were not merely academic; they fundamentally altered scientific understanding of the cislunar environment, providing critical data for the design of future spacecraft and for ensuring the safety of astronauts who would one day have to travel through this radiation-filled space.

The Soviet Union quickly followed up on this partial success. On September 12, 1959, Luna 2 was launched on a direct impact trajectory. Just two days later, it achieved its goal, crashing into the lunar surface in the Palus Putredinis region and becoming the first human-made object to make contact with another celestial body. Its journey confirmed Luna 1’s findings, verifying the absence of a significant magnetic field or radiation belts around the Moon. To mark the occasion, the probe released two metallic spheres covered in pentagonal pennants bearing the Soviet coat of arms, a symbolic claiming of a celestial first.

Less than a month later, on October 4, 1959, Luna 3 executed one of the most remarkable feats of the early space age. Launched on the second anniversary of Sputnik 1, the probe was sent on a trajectory that looped it around the Moon’s south pole, over its far side, and back toward Earth. For the first time, a spacecraft was three-axis stabilized, using gas jets and sensors to stop its spin and orient its cameras toward the lunar surface. On October 7, from a distance of over 63,500 kilometers, Luna 3’s automated camera system took 29 photographs of the Moon’s hidden hemisphere. The film was developed, fixed, and dried automatically onboard the spacecraft—a miniature photo lab in space. As Luna 3 swung back toward Earth, it scanned the negatives and transmitted the images via a slow-scan facsimile system.

The pictures, though grainy and indistinct by modern standards, were a revelation. They showed that the far side was strikingly different from the familiar near side. It was a rugged, mountainous, and heavily cratered terrain, almost entirely lacking the large, dark volcanic plains, or maria, that dominate the Earth-facing hemisphere. This significant asymmetry remains a key scientific mystery, and its discovery by Luna 3 provided humanity with its first glimpse of a truly alien landscape.

Luna 9: The First Soft Landing

For years, a major uncertainty for lunar mission planners was the nature of the Moon’s surface. Some theories suggested it might be covered in a deep layer of fine, loose dust, so unconsolidated that a landing spacecraft could sink without a trace. Resolving this question was essential before any crewed landing could be considered. After a dozen failed attempts by the Soviet Union, the answer arrived on February 3, 1966.

The Luna 9 spacecraft, launched three days earlier, successfully executed the first-ever controlled soft landing on another celestial body. The landing was a marvel of engineering. As the probe approached the Moon, a radar altimeter triggered the final sequence. Side modules were jettisoned, and large airbags inflated around the spherical 99-kilogram landing capsule. A main retrorocket fired to drastically slow the descent, followed by smaller vernier engines for fine control. At a height of about 5 meters, a contact sensor touched the surface, shutting down the engines and ejecting the capsule. Encased in its protective airbags, the lander hit the ground in Oceanus Procellarum (the Ocean of Storms) at about 22 km/hr, bouncing several times before coming to rest.

Minutes later, four petal-like panels on the capsule opened, stabilizing the craft on the surface and deploying its antennas. A television camera with a rotating mirror system began to survey the surroundings. The images it transmitted were the first ever taken from the surface of another world. They revealed a desolate, pockmarked landscape strewn with rocks of various sizes, with the horizon visible about 1.4 kilometers away. Most importantly, Luna 9 did not sink. It sat firmly on the surface, proving that the lunar regolith was solid enough to support the weight of a lander. This single piece of “ground truth” was a direct enabler of the Apollo program, validating the design concept for the Lunar Module’s landing gear and dispelling one of the greatest fears of mission planners.

Lunokhod and Sample Returns: Robotic Trailblazers

Following the success of Luna 9, the Soviet Union continued to push the boundaries of robotic exploration with increasingly complex and capable missions. In November 1970, the Luna 17 lander delivered Lunokhod 1 to the surface of Mare Imbrium. This was the first robotic wheeled rover to explore another world. Resembling a bathtub on eight wheels, the solar-powered rover was operated remotely by a five-person team on Earth. Over the next 10 months, Lunokhod 1 traveled more than 10 kilometers, returning over 20,000 television images and 200 panoramic views while conducting soil analysis with its instruments. A second, more advanced rover, Lunokhod 2, was delivered by Luna 21 in January 1973 and covered an impressive 37 kilometers in about four months.

In parallel with the rover missions, the Soviet program pioneered fully automated sample-return missions. In September 1970, Luna 16 landed in Mare Fecunditatis, deployed a robotic drill to collect a 101-gram core sample of lunar soil, and then launched a small ascent stage that returned the sample to Earth in a reentry capsule. This remarkable end-to-end robotic mission was repeated by Luna 20 in 1972, which returned soil from a highland region, and again by Luna 24 in 1976, which retrieved a core sample from Mare Crisium. In total, the three missions returned over 300 grams of lunar material, providing valuable scientific data without risking human lives. These missions demonstrated a level of automation and robotic capability that would not be matched for decades.

America’s Robotic Response

While the Soviet Union was racking up an impressive string of lunar firsts, the United States was working to catch up. NASA’s early robotic programs, Ranger and Surveyor, were developed as a direct response to the Soviet challenge. These missions were crucial for scouting potential landing sites for the Apollo program and for developing the technologies and operational experience needed for deep space exploration. The American effort had a difficult and frustrating start, marked by a series of high-profile failures that tested the resolve of the young space agency. a thorough programmatic overhaul eventually led to spectacular successes, providing the detailed, high-resolution data that was indispensable for planning the first human landings.

Project Ranger: Crashing for Science

The objective of Project Ranger was straightforward but technically demanding: obtain the first close-up photographs of the lunar surface. The spacecraft were not designed to land softly but to fly directly into the Moon, transmitting images back to Earth in the final minutes before their destructive impact. The program was initiated in 1959, and the spacecraft were designed to be fully attitude-stabilized platforms, a significant technological leap at the time.

The early years of the program were a trial by fire. Between 1961 and early 1964, the first six Ranger missions all failed to achieve their primary objectives. Rangers 1 and 2 failed to leave Earth orbit. Ranger 3 missed the Moon by a wide margin. Ranger 4’s onboard computer failed, though it did manage to impact the far side, becoming the first U.S. spacecraft to reach another celestial body. Ranger 5 also missed the Moon, and Ranger 6 had a flawless flight but its camera system failed to activate. This string of failures, costing $170 million, was a source of public embarrassment and intense political pressure, leading some to dub the program “shoot and hope”.

In the wake of the Ranger 6 failure, NASA implemented a major program reorganization. Harris Schurmeier was appointed as the new project manager, and the spacecraft design was simplified, eliminating other scientific instruments to focus solely on the television camera system. The agency also instituted a culture of exhaustive pre-flight testing and meticulous systems engineering. This difficult learning process, born from repeated failure, proved to be one of the most valuable outcomes of the entire program. It forged the rigorous engineering and management discipline that would become the hallmark of NASA’s later successes, including Apollo.

The turnaround was dramatic. On July 28, 1964, Ranger 7 was launched. Three days later, during the final 17 minutes of its flight, its six television cameras began transmitting a stream of stunningly clear images of the lunar surface. The probe sent back more than 4,300 photographs before crashing into a region later named Mare Cognitum (the “Sea That Has Become Known”). The final images, taken just fractions of a second before impact, revealed details a thousand times smaller than what could be seen from Earth, showing craters as small as a dishpan.

Ranger 8, launched in February 1965, successfully returned over 7,000 images of Mare Tranquillitatis, an area near the lunar equator being considered for Apollo landings. A month later, Ranger 9 impacted inside the large crater Alphonsus, transmitting 5,800 live television images that were broadcast to millions of viewers. Together, the final three Ranger missions provided over 17,000 high-resolution photographs, confirming that the lunar surface was cratered at all scales and giving Apollo planners the detailed maps they needed to identify safe and scientifically interesting landing zones.

Project Surveyor: The Soft Touch

Building on the lessons from Ranger, the Surveyor program was designed to master the complex art of soft-landing on the Moon and to perform the first in-situ analysis of the lunar surface. The program was a resounding success, with five of its seven missions achieving their goals and providing a wealth of engineering and scientific data that proved essential for the Apollo program.

On June 2, 1966—just four months after the Soviet Luna 9—Surveyor 1 executed a flawless soft landing in Oceanus Procellarum. Over the next several weeks, it transmitted more than 11,000 detailed photographs of its surroundings and sent back engineering data on the soil’s bearing strength, confirming that the surface was firm enough to support a heavy lander like the Apollo Lunar Module.

Later Surveyor missions carried more advanced scientific payloads. Surveyor 3, which landed in April 1967, was equipped with a remote-controlled soil-sampling arm that could dig trenches, perform bearing tests, and manipulate rocks on the surface, all while being observed by the spacecraft’s television camera. This provided the first direct data on the mechanical properties of the lunar regolith. Surveyors 5, 6, and 7 carried an alpha-scattering instrument that performed the first-ever on-site chemical analysis of the lunar soil. Surveyor 5, landing in Mare Tranquillitatis, found the soil to be basaltic in composition, similar to volcanic rocks on Earth. Surveyor 7, sent to the rugged highlands near the crater Tycho, found a different composition, one richer in aluminum. This provided the first direct evidence that the Moon had at least two distinct types of crust—the dark maria and the lighter highlands. This fundamental geological insight was incorporated into the training for Apollo astronauts, teaching them what types of rocks to look for and how to interpret the landscapes they would encounter.

The Surveyor program culminated in a remarkable rendezvous. In November 1969, the Apollo 12 crew executed a perfect pinpoint landing, setting their Lunar Module Intrepid down just 160 meters from the dormant Surveyor 3 spacecraft. Astronauts Pete Conrad and Alan Bean walked over to the robotic lander, photographed it, and retrieved its camera and other components. Analyzing these parts back on Earth allowed engineers to study the effects of over two and a half years of exposure to the harsh lunar environment, providing invaluable data for designing future long-duration hardware. The visit was a powerful symbol of the synergy between the robotic and human exploration programs, with the robotic pioneers scouting the way for the human explorers who followed.

The Apollo Era: Footprints on the Moon

The Apollo program stands as one of the most audacious and ambitious endeavors in human history. Born from a presidential challenge to land a man on the Moon and return him safely to the Earth before the end of the 1960s, it was a monumental undertaking that mobilized the resources of a nation. Between 1969 and 1972, six missions successfully landed twelve American astronauts on the lunar surface. While the program’s primary driver was geopolitical, its lasting legacy is scientific. The missions evolved from a single, daring landing into a sophisticated program of geological exploration. The astronauts, trained as field scientists, deployed complex experiments and returned nearly 400 kilograms of lunar rocks and soil. The analysis of these priceless samples fundamentally reshaped our understanding of the Moon, the Earth, and the formation of the solar system.

One Small Step: The Apollo 11 Landing

On July 20, 1969, the world held its breath as the Apollo 11 Lunar Module, Eagle, descended toward the Moon’s Sea of Tranquility. With Commander Neil Armstrong at the controls, the landing was a tense affair, as he manually piloted the craft to avoid a boulder-strewn crater, touching down with only seconds of fuel remaining. His first words from the surface, “Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed,” signaled the successful completion of a national goal set eight years earlier.

A few hours later, Armstrong descended the ladder and stepped onto the lunar surface, the first human to walk on another world. He was joined shortly after by Lunar Module Pilot Buzz Aldrin. Their Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) lasted just two and a half hours, a brief but historic foray onto a new frontier. Their first task was to collect a “contingency sample” of lunar soil, ensuring that even if the EVA had to be cut short, they would bring back a piece of the Moon. They then proceeded to collect a bulk sample of rocks and soil, ultimately gathering 21.6 kilograms of material to return to Earth.

Beyond sample collection, the crew deployed the Early Apollo Scientific Experiments Package (EASEP). This included a Passive Seismic Experiment to detect “moonquakes,” a Laser Ranging Retroreflector to allow for precise measurements of the Earth-Moon distance, and a Solar Wind Composition experiment, which consisted of a sheet of aluminum foil to trap particles from the solar wind for analysis back on Earth.

The scientific return from this first mission was immense. The returned rocks were primarily dark, fine-grained basalts, confirming the volcanic origin of the lunar maria. Many of these basalts were surprisingly rich in titanium, a composition uncommon in terrestrial rocks. The samples were also found to be ancient, with ages ranging from 3.6 to 3.9 billion years, and completely devoid of water.

The most significant discovery came from something the astronauts didn’t even know they had collected. Within the breccias—rocks composed of fused fragments of other rocks, created by meteorite impacts—scientists in the Lunar Receiving Laboratory in Houston found tiny, light-colored flecks. These were fragments of anorthosite, a rock type composed almost entirely of the mineral plagioclase feldspar. This was a rock from the lunar highlands, blasted to the Tranquility Base landing site by a distant impact.

The existence of anorthosite led to a revolutionary new theory of the Moon’s origin: the magma ocean hypothesis. Scientists John Wood and Joseph Smith independently proposed that in its infancy, some 4.5 billion years ago, the Moon was completely or largely molten—a global ocean of magma. As this magma ocean cooled, the lighter plagioclase crystals formed and floated to the top, like cream, accumulating to form the Moon’s primordial crust, which we now see as the bright lunar highlands. The denser minerals sank, forming the mantle. This single idea, sparked by a few tiny fragments in the first sample box from the Moon, explained the fundamental dichotomy between the highlands and the maria and has since become the cornerstone of modern lunar science.

Expanding the Frontier: Apollo 12, 14, and 15

The success of Apollo 11 transformed the program. With the primary political objective achieved, subsequent missions could focus on expanding the scope and ambition of scientific exploration. Each new landing built upon the last, with longer stays, more extensive surface traverses, and increasingly sophisticated experiments.

Apollo 12, launched in November 1969, had a key engineering objective: to demonstrate a pinpoint landing capability. The crew of Pete Conrad and Alan Bean successfully set their Lunar Module Intrepid down in the Ocean of Storms, just 160 meters from the Surveyor 3 robotic probe that had landed two and a half years earlier. During two EVAs totaling nearly eight hours, the astronauts deployed the first full Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), a suite of nuclear-powered instruments designed to operate for years. They also walked to the Surveyor probe, documenting its condition and retrieving its camera and other parts for analysis on Earth, providing crucial data on how materials degrade in the lunar environment.

After the near-disaster of Apollo 13 forced an abort, Apollo 14 successfully reached the Moon in February 1971, targeting Apollo 13’s original destination: the Fra Mauro formation. This was the first mission to explore a highland region, specifically an area believed to be covered in a deep blanket of ejecta from the colossal impact that formed the Imbrium Basin, one of the largest and youngest basins on the Moon. To help them cover more ground and carry tools and samples across the rugged, hilly terrain, astronauts Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell used the Modular Equipment Transporter (MET), a two-wheeled, hand-pulled cart. During a long traverse toward Cone Crater, they collected 42 kilograms of samples, including a 9-kilogram breccia nicknamed “Big Bertha,” which contained clues about the deep history of the lunar crust.

Apollo 15, in July 1971, marked another major leap in capability as the first of the advanced “J-missions”. These missions featured an upgraded Lunar Module that allowed for a three-day stay on the surface and, most significantly, the debut of the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV). This electric-powered “moon buggy” allowed astronauts David Scott and James Irwin to travel far beyond their landing site, covering nearly 28 kilometers during three EVAs. Their landing site at Hadley-Apennine was the most spectacular yet, situated at the base of the towering Apennine Mountains on the rim of the Imbrium Basin and next to the snaking, 300-meter-deep Hadley Rille. The rover enabled them to sample both the dark mare basalts of the plains and the ancient highland rocks of the mountains. At Spur Crater, on the slope of Mount Hadley Delta, they found what they were looking for: a crystalline rock composed almost entirely of plagioclase anorthosite. Scott famously announced, “Guess what we just found! I think we found what we came for,” recognizing it as a piece of the Moon’s primordial crust. This sample, nicknamed the “Genesis Rock,” was a large, pristine piece of anorthosite that provided stunning confirmation of the magma ocean hypothesis.

The Final Journeys: Apollo 16 and 17

The final two Apollo missions were the most scientifically ambitious of the program, leveraging the full capabilities of the J-mission hardware to explore complex geological sites.

Apollo 16, in April 1972, was the only mission to land in the central lunar highlands, a region known as the Descartes formation. Based on orbital photography, geologists believed the site was dominated by ancient lunar volcanoes, and the mission’s primary objective was to sample these volcanic rocks. upon landing, astronauts John Young and Charles Duke were met with a surprise. The landscape was not volcanic. Instead, virtually every rock they found was a breccia, a product of meteorite impacts. The mission forced a major re-evaluation of lunar geology, revealing that the highlands were shaped far more by the relentless bombardment of impacts than by volcanism. Using the LRV to traverse 27 kilometers, Young and Duke collected 96 kilograms of samples, including some of the largest and oldest anorthosite rocks of the entire Apollo program, further cementing the magma ocean theory as the leading model for the Moon’s early evolution.

The final journey of the Apollo program, Apollo 17, launched in December 1972. Its destination was the Taurus-Littrow valley, a unique site that offered the chance to sample both very old highland material from the surrounding massifs and potentially very young volcanic material on the valley floor. For the first and only time, the crew included a professional scientist, geologist Harrison Schmitt, as the Lunar Module Pilot. Over three EVAs and 35 kilometers of driving in the LRV, Commander Eugene Cernan and Schmitt conducted the most extensive field geology of any mission.

Their exploration yielded a trove of discoveries. They collected samples of ancient highland breccias from boulders that had rolled down from the mountains, providing insight into the massive Serenitatis basin impact event. On the valley floor, they made a famous and startling discovery at Shorty Crater: a patch of bright orange soil. Initially thought to be evidence of recent volcanic activity, analysis back on Earth revealed it to be a deposit of microscopic glass beads, formed in a volcanic fire fountain eruption 3.64 billion years ago. The mission returned a record 110.5 kilograms of lunar material, a rich scientific bounty that continues to be studied today. On December 14, 1972, Eugene Cernan climbed the ladder of the Lunar Module Challenger for the last time, becoming the last human to date to walk on the Moon.

An Abrupt End

Despite the escalating scientific success of the later missions, the Apollo program came to a premature end. The original plan had called for missions up to Apollo 20, but Apollo 18, 19, and 20 were cancelled. The reasons were complex, rooted in the same political realities that had given birth to the program.

The primary driver for Apollo had always been geopolitical: to beat the Soviet Union to the Moon. Once Apollo 11 achieved that goal, the program lost its most powerful justification. Public and political support, never universally high, began to wane as the nation’s attention turned to pressing domestic issues, including the costly Vietnam War, urban problems, and a growing environmental movement. The immense cost of the Apollo missions became increasingly difficult to justify to a public that saw the race as already won.

NASA’s budget peaked in the mid-1960s and was already in decline by the time of the first landing. These cuts forced the agency to make difficult choices. The first cancellation, Apollo 20, came in early 1970, even before the Apollo 13 incident, to free up its powerful Saturn V rocket to launch the Skylab space station. Following the near-disaster of Apollo 13, and with budgets continuing to shrink, NASA cancelled Apollo 18 and 19 in late 1970. The remaining Apollo hardware was repurposed for Skylab and the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, a joint mission with the Soviet Union in 1975 that symbolized an end to the space race and a shift in focus to low-Earth orbit and international détente. The program’s very success had removed its core political rationale, leaving the subsequent, more scientifically valuable missions vulnerable. Without a compelling long-term vision beyond winning the race, the political will to continue the expensive journeys to the Moon simply evaporated.

The Long Interlude: A Quiet Moon

After the departure of Apollo 17, the Moon entered a period of relative quiet. For more than a decade, no new missions ventured to our celestial neighbor. The intense focus and massive budgets of the Apollo era gave way to other priorities on Earth. Yet, this interlude was not entirely empty. A few key robotic missions, often designed as technology demonstrators or low-cost scientific probes, kept the flame of lunar exploration alive. It was during this quiet period that a discovery was made that would fundamentally alter the future of lunar exploration and provide the primary catalyst for the current international and commercial return to the Moon.

The Last Echo of the Space Race

The final lunar mission of the original space race era was not an American one. In August 1976, the Soviet Union launched Luna 24, its third successful robotic sample-return mission. The spacecraft landed in Mare Crisium (the Sea of Crises) and deployed an advanced rotary drill that penetrated two meters into the lunar regolith, extracting a core sample. The 170-gram sample was sealed in a return capsule, which then blasted off from the Moon and parachuted to a landing in Siberia a few days later.

At the time, the mission was seen as a final, impressive demonstration of Soviet robotic capabilities. Its true significance would not be fully appreciated for decades. Initial analysis confirmed the soil was similar to other mare basalts, but later, more sensitive studies of the Luna 24 samples provided some of the first compelling evidence that lunar soil contained trace amounts of water—about 0.1% by mass. This finding was an early hint that the Moon might not be the completely dry world that the Apollo samples had suggested. After Luna 24, the Moon would wait 14 years for its next visitor from Earth.

A Cautious Return

The return to the Moon began not with a bang, but with a series of tentative, technologically focused missions. In January 1990, Japan became the third nation to send a spacecraft to the Moon with the launch of Hiten. Primarily a technology demonstration mission, Hiten’s main goal was to test orbital mechanics for future interplanetary flights. It successfully executed multiple lunar swing-bys and was the first deep space probe to use aerobraking—dipping into Earth’s upper atmosphere to modify its orbit. It also released a tiny subsatellite, Hagoromo, which was intended to orbit the Moon, though a transmitter failure meant its success could never be confirmed. After its primary mission, engineers ingeniously plotted a low-energy transfer trajectory that allowed the main Hiten spacecraft to enter lunar orbit in 1992, where it remained until it was intentionally crashed into the surface in 1993.

The United States made its own return in 1994 with Clementine, a joint project between NASA and the Department of Defense’s Ballistic Missile Defense Organization. Like Hiten, its primary purpose was to test new, lightweight sensors and spacecraft components for military applications. As a secondary objective, it spent 71 days in a polar orbit around the Moon, using its suite of cameras and a laser altimeter to create the first global topographic and multispectral maps of the entire lunar surface.

Clementine’s most significant contribution came from an improvised experiment. The spacecraft used its radio transmitter to bounce signals into the permanently shadowed craters at the Moon’s south pole, with the reflected signals being received by antennas on Earth. The way the signals scattered suggested they were reflecting off something more like ice than rock. This was the first direct, though inconclusive, evidence that water ice might be trapped in these frigid, dark regions where sunlight never reaches.

This tantalizing hint of water prompted NASA to develop Lunar Prospector, a small, low-cost orbiter in the agency’s Discovery Program, launched in January 1998. Its primary mission was to follow up on Clementine’s findings and create detailed maps of the Moon’s surface composition, gravity, and magnetic fields. Onboard was a neutron spectrometer designed specifically to detect the presence of hydrogen. Cosmic rays constantly bombard the lunar surface, creating a spray of neutrons. If these neutrons collide with hydrogen atoms—the “H” in H2O—they slow down significantly. The instrument detected a distinct drop in the energy of neutrons emanating from the polar regions, a clear signature of high hydrogen concentrations.

The data strongly indicated the presence of vast quantities of water ice, mixed in with the regolith in the permanently shadowed craters at both the north and south poles. Initial estimates suggested billions of tons of ice could be present. At the end of its mission in July 1999, Lunar Prospector was deliberately crashed into a crater near the south pole in a dramatic attempt to kick up a plume of water vapor that could be observed by telescopes on Earth. No such plume was detected, leaving the confirmation ambiguous.

Despite the inconclusive impact experiment, the orbital data from Clementine and Lunar Prospector was revolutionary. It fundamentally changed the scientific and strategic perception of the Moon. The Apollo missions had returned bone-dry samples, leading to the long-held belief that the Moon was devoid of water. The discovery of polar ice transformed the Moon from a barren, albeit scientifically interesting, world into a potential extraterrestrial oasis. This water could, in theory, be mined and processed to provide breathable air, drinking water, and, most importantly, hydrogen and oxygen for rocket propellant. This concept, known as In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU), created a powerful new rationale for returning to the Moon. It was no longer just about science or prestige; it was about resources that could enable a sustainable, long-term human presence in space and fuel future voyages to Mars. This single discovery became the primary driver for the global lunar renaissance of the 21st century.

A New Century, A New Race: The Global Return to the Moon

The turn of the 21st century marked the beginning of a new era in lunar exploration. The discovery of water ice at the poles, combined with the rise of new spacefaring nations and the emergence of a vibrant commercial space sector, reignited global interest in the Moon. This new race is fundamentally different from the first. It’s not a head-to-head sprint between two superpowers but a complex, multipolar landscape of competition and collaboration. Nations from Asia and Europe have developed their own ambitious lunar programs, achieving remarkable successes and breaking the old U.S.-Soviet duopoly. Simultaneously, a new paradigm has emerged in the United States, where NASA is increasingly partnering with private companies to foster a commercial lunar economy.

The Rise of New Players

For decades, lunar exploration was the exclusive domain of the United States and the Soviet Union. Today, the landscape is far more diverse, with several nations developing and flying their own sophisticated missions.

China’s Chang’e Program

Leading the new wave of lunar explorers is China. The China National Space Administration (CNSA) has executed a methodical, multi-phased lunar exploration program named after the Chinese moon goddess, Chang’e. This program has progressed with remarkable speed and success. After two successful mapping orbiters, Chang’e 1 and 2, China achieved the first soft landing on the Moon in 37 years with Chang’e 3 in December 2013. The lander deployed the Yutu (“Jade Rabbit”) rover, which explored the Mare Imbrium region.

In January 2019, China achieved a monumental milestone with Chang’e 4, which performed the first-ever soft landing on the far side of the Moon. Since the far side never faces Earth, the mission required the pre-launch of the Queqiao relay satellite, placed in a special halo orbit beyond the Moon to provide a continuous communications link. The lander and its Yutu-2 rover touched down in the vast South Pole-Aitken basin, an ancient and scientifically compelling region that may contain exposed material from the Moon’s mantle.

In December 2020, Chang’e 5 executed a highly complex, Apollo-style robotic sample-return mission. The lander touched down in Oceanus Procellarum, drilled into the surface, collected 1.7 kilograms of soil, and launched an ascent vehicle back into lunar orbit. The ascent vehicle then autonomously rendezvoused and docked with an orbiter, transferred the sample to a return capsule, which then flew back to Earth. The returned samples were found to be only 2 billion years old, far younger than any Apollo or Luna samples, filling a critical gap in our understanding of the Moon’s volcanic history. Building on this success, Chang’e 6 completed the first-ever sample return from the Moon’s far side in June 2024. These missions are precursors to China’s long-term plan to establish an International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) near the south pole in collaboration with Russia and other partners.

India’s Chandrayaan Program

India has also emerged as a major player in lunar exploration with its Chandrayaan program. Its first mission, Chandrayaan-1, was an orbiter launched in 2008. It carried a suite of international instruments, including NASA’s Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3). Data from M3 provided the first definitive, widespread mineralogical evidence of water and hydroxyl molecules on the lunar surface, confirming the earlier hints from Luna 24 and the hydrogen detections by Lunar Prospector. The mission also deployed a Moon Impact Probe, which detected water signatures in the thin lunar atmosphere just before it crashed near the south pole.

India’s second mission, Chandrayaan-2, launched in 2019, was a more ambitious attempt consisting of an orbiter, a lander named Vikram, and a rover named Pragyan. While the orbiter successfully entered its planned orbit and continues to return high-resolution data, a software glitch during the final descent caused the lander to crash. Undeterred, the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) built upon the lessons learned and launched Chandrayaan-3 in 2023. On August 23, 2023, the Vikram lander made a flawless touchdown near the lunar south pole, making India only the fourth nation to achieve a soft landing on the Moon and the very first to do so in the strategic south polar region. The Pragyan rover successfully deployed and explored the landing site for nearly two weeks, conducting chemical analysis of the soil before the mission ended with the onset of the lunar night.

Other National Efforts

The new lunar race is not limited to China and India. In January 2024, Japan’s SLIM (Smart Lander for Investigating Moon) mission successfully landed on the Moon, making Japan the fifth nation to do so. The mission’s primary objective was to demonstrate a novel “pinpoint” landing technology. Using a vision-based navigation system that matched real-time images with pre-loaded maps, SLIM achieved an unprecedented landing accuracy of within 100 meters of its target on the slope of Shioli crater. Although the lander tipped over on touchdown, compromising its solar power generation, it survived the lunar night and continued to operate, proving the viability of its precision landing system.

South Korea joined the ranks of lunar explorers in 2022 with the launch of its first lunar orbiter, Danuri. Danuri is currently mapping the Moon with a suite of instruments, including a highly sensitive camera provided by NASA called ShadowCam, which is specifically designed to take high-resolution images inside the permanently shadowed regions at the poles to search for water ice and scout future landing sites.

Other attempts have been less successful, highlighting the persistent difficulty of landing on the Moon. In 2019, the privately funded Israeli lander Beresheet crashed during its landing attempt. In August 2023, Russia’s Luna 25, its first lunar mission in 47 years, also crashed while attempting to land near the south pole.

The Commercial Frontier: NASA’s CLPS Program

In parallel with the rise of new national space agencies, the 21st century has seen a dramatic shift in the American approach to robotic lunar exploration. Instead of designing, building, and operating its own spacecraft, NASA has initiated the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program. Under this innovative model, NASA acts as a customer, purchasing payload delivery services from a pool of private American companies. The goal is to spur innovation, reduce costs, and create a vibrant commercial marketplace for lunar transportation, all while accelerating the pace of science and technology demonstration in support of the Artemis program.

This approach explicitly embraces a higher tolerance for risk compared to traditional, multi-billion-dollar flagship missions. The idea is that by funding multiple, lower-cost missions, the overall program can absorb some failures while still achieving its objectives more quickly and affordably than before.

The first missions of the CLPS era have underscored both the promise and the peril of this new model. In January 2024, the first CLPS mission, Astrobotic’s Peregrine Mission One, was launched. Unfortunately, the spacecraft suffered a critical propellant leak shortly after separating from its rocket, making a lunar landing impossible. The mission ended with the spacecraft being intentionally guided to burn up in Earth’s atmosphere.

Just one month later, in February 2024, the second CLPS mission achieved a historic success. The IM-1 mission by Houston-based company Intuitive Machines successfully delivered its Odysseus lander to the surface near the lunar south pole. The landing marked the first time an American spacecraft had soft-landed on the Moon in over 50 years and was the first-ever successful landing by a private company. The landing was not without drama; a last-minute failure of the lander’s primary navigation sensors forced engineers to upload a software patch to use an experimental NASA payload as a backup. The lander touched down at a higher speed than planned and tipped over, coming to rest on its side. Despite the awkward orientation, which limited solar power and communications, Odysseus successfully returned data from several NASA and commercial payloads before the lunar night ended its mission.

These early missions highlight the dynamic nature of the CLPS initiative. Many more are planned, with companies like Firefly Aerospace and Draper contracted to deliver increasingly complex payloads, including rovers, drills, and seismometers, to diverse locations across the Moon, including the scientifically intriguing Schrödinger Basin on the far side. This new ecosystem of commercial providers, fostered by NASA, is creating a new kind of space race—one driven not just by national prestige, but by the burgeoning potential of a true lunar economy.

The Artemis Generation: To the Moon to Stay

More than fifty years after the last Apollo astronaut left his footprints in the lunar dust, humanity is preparing to return. NASA’s Artemis program is a bold and ambitious endeavor to land the first woman and first person of color on the Moon and, in doing so, to establish a long-term, sustainable human presence on and around our nearest celestial neighbor. This is not a repeat of Apollo’s brief “flags and footprints” sorties. The entire architecture of the Artemis program is built around the idea of sustainability—of going to the Moon to stay. This long-term vision treats the Moon not as a final destination, but as a crucial proving ground, a place to develop the technologies, operational experience, and international and commercial partnerships needed to take the next giant leap: sending humans to Mars.

The Artemis Program: Goals and Architecture

The Artemis program is structured as a series of increasingly complex missions that will build upon each other to create a permanent lunar capability. The campaign began with Artemis I, an uncrewed test flight that launched in November 2022. The mission successfully sent the new Orion spacecraft on a 25-day journey into a distant retrograde orbit around the Moon and back to Earth, testing the performance of both the spacecraft and its powerful Space Launch System (SLS) rocket in the deep space environment.

The next mission, Artemis II, is planned to be the first crewed flight of the program. A four-person crew will pilot the Orion spacecraft on a lunar flyby mission, venturing farther from Earth than any humans have before. This approximately 10-day flight will validate the spacecraft’s life-support systems and test the capabilities needed for crewed deep space operations.

The culmination of these preparatory flights will be Artemis III, which will mark the return of humans to the lunar surface. Scheduled for the mid-2020s, the mission will land two astronauts near the lunar south pole, a region of immense scientific interest due to the presence of water ice in permanently shadowed craters. The crew will spend about a week on the surface, conducting geological fieldwork and deploying experiments before returning to lunar orbit to rendezvous with their crewmates in Orion for the journey home. Subsequent missions, like Artemis IV and V, will deliver key components of a lunar-orbiting space station and land crews for longer and more complex surface expeditions.

The Hardware of a New Era

The Artemis program is enabled by a new generation of powerful hardware, combining legacy systems with cutting-edge commercial innovations.

Space Launch System (SLS)

The backbone of the Artemis missions is the Space Launch System, a super heavy-lift rocket that is the most powerful ever built by NASA. The SLS is the only rocket capable of sending the Orion spacecraft, astronauts, and large cargo to the Moon on a single launch. Its initial “Block 1” configuration, used for the first three Artemis missions, stands 98 meters tall and generates 8.8 million pounds of thrust at liftoff—15% more than the Saturn V rocket of the Apollo era. Its massive core stage is powered by four RS-25 engines, the same highly reliable engines that powered the Space Shuttle, and is flanked by two five-segment solid rocket boosters. The SLS is designed to be evolvable, with future “Block 1B” and “Block 2” configurations featuring a more powerful Exploration Upper Stage and advanced boosters, allowing it to lift even heavier payloads to deep space destinations.

Orion Spacecraft

The Orion spacecraft is humanity’s vessel for this new age of deep space exploration. Built by NASA and prime contractor Lockheed Martin, it is the only spacecraft currently capable of carrying a crew on missions beyond low-Earth orbit and withstanding the extreme conditions of a return from lunar velocity. Orion’s crew module can sustain four astronauts for up to 21 days and is equipped with advanced life support, navigation, and communication systems. Its design incorporates full redundancy for all critical systems and a powerful launch abort system to pull the crew to safety in an emergency. Its most critical component is its heat shield, the largest of its kind ever built, which is designed to protect the crew from the searing 2,760°C temperatures of reentry into Earth’s atmosphere at speeds of nearly 40,000 km/hr.

Human Landing Systems (HLS)

In a significant departure from the Apollo model, NASA is not building the lunar lander itself. Instead, it is partnering with American companies through the Human Landing System (HLS) program to develop and operate the vehicles that will ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface and back.

For the first landings, Artemis III and IV, NASA has selected SpaceX’s Starship HLS. This is a specialized, lunar-optimized variant of the company’s massive, fully reusable Starship spacecraft. Stripped of the heat shield and aerodynamic flaps needed for Earth reentry, the Starship HLS is designed to be a dedicated lunar lander and surface habitat. Its mission architecture is novel and ambitious: a Starship HLS will first be launched into Earth orbit, where it will be fully refueled by a series of “tanker” Starship flights before boosting itself to lunar orbit to await the arrival of the Orion crew.

To ensure redundancy and foster competition, NASA has also awarded a contract to a “National Team” led by Blue Origin to develop a second lander, Blue Moon, for the Artemis V mission. The Blue Moon lander is being developed in partnership with Lockheed Martin, Draper, Boeing, and other aerospace companies and represents a more traditional lander design. This dual-provider strategy is intended to ensure a robust and sustainable transportation capability to the lunar surface.

Gateway: A Staging Post in Lunar Orbit

A cornerstone of the Artemis program’s long-term vision is the Lunar Gateway, a small, human-tended space station that will be placed in a unique orbit around the Moon. Unlike the International Space Station, which is continuously inhabited, the Gateway will be designed for autonomous operation, with crews visiting to prepare for missions to the lunar surface or deeper into space.

The Gateway will be assembled in a Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO), a highly stable, seven-day orbit that provides continuous communication with Earth and access to the entire lunar surface, including the poles. It will serve as a command and communications hub, a science laboratory, and a staging point where astronauts arriving on Orion can transfer to their Human Landing System for the final leg of the journey to the Moon. The Gateway is an international collaboration, with key modules and components being provided by NASA’s partners, including the European Space Agency (ESA), the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). The first two modules—the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) and the Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO)—are scheduled to be launched together on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket and will spend a year spiraling out to their operational lunar orbit.

A Global Alliance vs. a New Bloc

The geopolitical landscape of this new lunar era is being shaped by two parallel and competing frameworks for international cooperation. The U.S.-led effort is underpinned by the Artemis Accords, a set of non-binding principles for the peaceful and responsible exploration of space. Grounded in the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, the Accords promote transparency, interoperability, emergency assistance, the open sharing of scientific data, and the preservation of space heritage. They also address the utilization of space resources, affirming that such activities can be conducted in compliance with international law. Since their introduction in 2020, the Accords have been signed by a rapidly growing number of nations, forming a broad coalition for the Artemis program.

In parallel, China and Russia are leading the development of the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), a planned robotic and eventually crewed base at the lunar south pole. The ILRS is being developed through a series of phased missions, beginning with the ongoing Chang’e and future Luna missions, with construction planned to begin in the early 2030s and crewed operations potentially starting after 2036. Several other nations and organizations have signed on to partner with the ILRS project. This has created two distinct, and potentially rival, blocs for the future of lunar exploration and development, setting the stage for a new kind of space race focused on establishing strategic presence and norms of behavior on the Moon.

The Future on the Surface

Establishing a permanent human outpost on the Moon is a monumental challenge. The lunar environment is unforgiving, with no atmosphere to shield against the constant threat of radiation and micrometeoroid impacts. Surface temperatures swing wildly from over 120°C in sunlight to below -170°C in darkness. The lunar dust, or regolith, is a fine, abrasive powder that can damage equipment and pose a serious health hazard to astronauts.

Overcoming these challenges is the central task of the Artemis program. The key to creating a sustainable presence lies in “living off the land” through In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). The most critical resource is the water ice confirmed to exist in the permanently shadowed craters at the poles. This ice can be mined and processed to produce drinking water and breathable oxygen for life support systems. It can also be split into its constituent hydrogen and oxygen, which are the primary components of powerful rocket propellant. The ability to refuel spacecraft on the Moon would dramatically reduce the cost and complexity of deep space missions, as the immense mass of propellant would no longer need to be launched out of Earth’s deep gravity well.

Ultimately, everything learned and built on the Moon—from radiation shielding and closed-loop life support systems to ISRU technologies and long-duration surface operations—is designed with a farther destination in mind. The Artemis program explicitly frames the Moon as a proving ground, a place to test the systems and gain the experience needed to undertake humanity’s next great exploration challenge: the first human missions to Mars. The entire architecture of Artemis, from the south pole landing sites to the development of the Gateway, is a direct result of the scientific discoveries of the past and a strategic investment in a future where humanity’s footprint extends beyond its cradle and into the solar system.

Summary

The story of lunar landings is a sweeping saga of human ambition, technological ingenuity, and shifting global priorities. It began as a frantic, politically charged race between two superpowers, where robotic probes served as the vanguard, achieving a series of historic firsts that paved the way for human explorers. The Apollo program, a monumental national effort, culminated in six successful landings that not only fulfilled a political promise but also returned a treasure trove of scientific data that revolutionized our understanding of the Moon’s origin and history.

Following this brief, brilliant era, the Moon fell quiet. A long interlude saw only a few robotic visitors, but their discoveries were significant. The confirmation of water ice trapped in the cold, dark craters of the lunar poles fundamentally changed the calculus of space exploration, transforming the Moon from a desolate scientific outpost into a potential resource hub for future missions.

This discovery has fueled a 21st-century renaissance in lunar exploration, one that is more global, more commercial, and more collaborative than ever before. New nations have joined the quest, achieving their own remarkable landings and discoveries, while a new commercial space industry is developing innovative and cost-effective ways to access the lunar surface. Today, humanity stands on the cusp of a new lunar era with the Artemis program. This time, the goal is not just to visit, but to stay—to build a sustainable human presence on the Moon. The Moon, once the finish line of a race between nations, has now become the crucial starting block for humanity’s next great journey into the solar system, serving as a proving ground for the technologies and experience we will need to one day set foot on Mars.

Last update on 2025-12-16 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API