The Age of Disclosure and the Unraveling of Government Secrecy

This article is part of an ongoing series created in collaboration with the UAP News Center, a leading website for the most up-to-date UAP news and information. Visit UAP News Center for the full collection of infographics.

Key Takeaways

• Whistleblowers expose potential retrieval programs
• Officials demand oversight on non-human intelligence
• Scientific analysis validates anomalous physics data

Introduction

The Eighty-Year Timeline of Secrecy

The upper section of the attached infographic establishes a timeline stretching from the 1940s to the present day. This chronology is essential for understanding the current pressure for disclosure. The narrative begins with the Roswell incident in 1947, a seminal event that many researchers identify as the genesis of the modern cover-up. While the United States Air Force maintains that the debris recovered was from a Project Mogul balloon train, the counter-narrative presented by the individuals in the infographic suggests a different reality involving the recovery of non-human technology.

The timeline re-emerges into the public eye with the Nimitz Incident in 2004. This event, involving the USS Nimitz carrier strike group and the now-famous “Tic Tac” object, represents a turning point where sensor data, radar logs, and multiple credible eyewitnesses provided evidence that could not be easily dismissed as swamp gas or mass hallucinations. This incident laid the groundwork for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), which ran from 2007 to 2012, and eventually led to the congressional hearings of the 2020s.

Whistleblowers and Program Insiders

The most explosive aspect of the current disclosure movement comes from individuals who served within the intelligence and defense apparatus. The infographic categorizes these figures as “Whistleblowers & Program Insiders,” highlighting their direct testimony regarding hidden programs.

Luis Elizondo and the Legacy of AATIP

Luis Elizondo occupies a central role in this narrative. As the former director of AATIP, Elizondo resigned from the Department of Defense in 2017 to protest what he characterized as excessive secrecy and bureaucratic opposition to investigating threats posed by UAP. His assertion, quoted in the infographic, describes an “80-year secret program hiding evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence.” Elizondo popularized the concept of the “Five Observables” – distinct characteristics of UAP that defy known physics, such as instantaneous acceleration, hypersonic velocity without signatures, and trans-medium travel.

Elizondo’s advocacy focuses on the national security implications of these objects. He argues that if these craft are not American, Russian, or Chinese, they represent a technology gap that leaves the United States vulnerable. His efforts were instrumental in bringing the 2004 Nimitz videos to the public, forcing the government to acknowledge that UAP are real and require serious study.

Jay Stratton and the UAP Task Force

Jay Stratton, identified in the infographic as the former UAP Task Force Director, represents the transition from the clandestine work of AATIP to more formalized, albeit still classified, investigation bodies. Stratton’s statement, “I have seen with my own eyes non-human craft and non-human beings,” is a stark declaration. As a high-ranking intelligence official, Stratton had access to classified data across the intelligence community.

His role was to standardize the reporting of UAP across the military branches. Before his tenure, pilots often faced stigma and ridicule for reporting sightings, leading to a massive underreporting of incursions into military airspace. Stratton worked to destigmatize the topic, allowing for a clearer picture of the frequency and nature of these events. His testimony supports the idea that the phenomenon involves biological entities, not just automated drones or remote probes.

David Grusch and the Crash Retrieval Allegations

Perhaps the most significant figure in the recent wave of disclosure is David Grusch. A former intelligence officer with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the National Reconnaissance Office, Grusch provided sworn testimony to the United States Congress regarding the existence of a “multi-decade crash retrieval program.” The infographic highlights his claim that the US government possesses “non-human spacecraft” and “biologics” (dead pilots).

Grusch’s allegations go beyond simple sightings. He alleges a complex criminal conspiracy to hide these programs from congressional oversight, involving the misappropriation of funds and intimidation tactics against those who attempt to reveal the truth. Grusch asserts that he interviewed over forty individuals with direct knowledge of these programs during his official duties investigating UAP for the task force. His decision to utilize the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act allowed him to bring this information to the Inspector General and Congress, marking a shift from public speculation to formal legal whistleblower complaints.

High-Level Government and Intelligence Officials

The infographic distinguishes between whistleblowers and the high-level officials who provide “Institutional Credibility & Oversight.” These individuals are not necessarily claiming to have seen aliens themselves but are confirming the systemic issues regarding secrecy and the validity of the intelligence data.

Marco Rubio and Legislative Action

Marco Rubio, listed in the infographic with the title of US Secretary of State (2025), has been a vocal advocate for UAP transparency during his time in the Senate. As the Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Rubio was privy to classified briefings that likely informed his perspective. His quote, “Even Presidents can be ‘read out’ of deep black programs,” highlights the structural problem of “stove-piping,” where information is compartmentalized so strictly that even the highest elected officials are denied access.

Rubio’s concern centers on the failure of imagination regarding adversary capabilities. If the US government ignores UAP because they do not fit the standard definition of a threat or because the data is locked away in illegal programs, the nation remains vulnerable. His legislative efforts have pushed for annual reports and the protection of witnesses who come forward with information about these legacy programs.

James Clapper and Intelligence Validation

James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence (DNI), adds significant weight to the discussion. A figure of his stature validating the “current intelligence community work on UAPs as a legitimate national concern” makes it difficult to dismiss the topic as fringe. Clapper’s acknowledgement suggests that the intelligence apparatus has data that requires explanation. His involvement indicates that the issue is not just about lights in the sky but involves tangible data collection by national assets – satellites, radar systems, and underwater sensors.

Christopher Mellon and the Pentagon’s Resistance

Christopher Mellon, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, has been a strategic architect of the disclosure process. Mellon famously helped facilitate the release of the “Gimbal,” “Go Fast,” and “Flir1” videos. His quote in the infographic, “Information is stove-piped within the Pentagon to prevent oversight,” identifies the bureaucratic mechanism used to maintain secrecy.

Mellon argues that the secrecy is often maintained not to protect the technology from adversaries, but to protect the bureaucracy from oversight. He has written extensively on how Special Access Programs can be used to hide activities from Congress, effectively operating outside the constitutionally mandated checks and balances. Mellon’s work focuses on forcing the Pentagon to integrate its data, arguing that stove-piping prevents the US from connecting the dots on UAP activity.

Kirsten Gillibrand and the Demand for Transparency

Kirsten Gillibrand has been the driving force behind the legislative framework for UAP investigation. She spearheaded the creation of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). Her call for “radical transparency” reflects a frustration with the slow pace of the Pentagon’s response to congressional inquiries. Gillibrand frames the issue as “domain awareness.” If the US military cannot identify craft operating in its airspace, that is a failure of defense. Her mention of “China, Russia, or something else” keeps the conversation grounded in pragmatic defense concerns while leaving the door open for the extraterrestrial hypothesis.

Scientists and Technical Experts

The infographic includes a section for “Scientists & Technical Experts,” emphasizing that the disclosure movement is supported by rigorous analysis, not just anecdotal stories.

Dr. Hal Puthoff and the Reality of Interference

Hal Puthoff, a physicist with a long history of working with government programs (including the remote viewing “Stargate” program), is cited asserting the reality of extraterrestrial interference. His mention of interference around “US nuclear facilities” touches on a disturbing pattern reported since the 1960s. UAP have been documented hovering over nuclear silos, sometimes allegedly disabling the launch mechanisms of ICBMs. Puthoff’s work involves analyzing the physics of how such craft might operate and the potential intent behind their interest in nuclear technology.

Dr. Eric Davis and Advanced Physics

Dr. Eric Davis, an astrophysicist, is often associated with the Admiral Wilson Memo, a document detailing an alleged meeting where a high-ranking admiral was denied access to a crash retrieval program. In the context of the infographic, Davis “confirms scientific viability of observed UAP flight characteristics.” His expertise lies in propulsion physics – specifically, how a craft could move without control surfaces, exhaust, or visible means of lift. Davis validates the sensor data provided by military encounters, arguing that the performance characteristics exceed the material science and energy generation capabilities of any known human nation.

First-Hand Witnesses and Political Pressure

The “First-Hand Witnesses & Advocates” section connects the raw data of the pilots with the political will to expose it.

Alex Dietrich and the Nimitz Encounter

Alex Dietrich, a former US Navy pilot, provides the “ground truth” for one of the most significant encounters in history. During the 2004 Nimitz incident, Dietrich was one of the pilots who visually engaged the Tic Tac object. Her account describes a white, oblong object with no wings or rotors mimicking the movements of her aircraft. Dietrich’s testimony is vital because it corroborates the account of Commander David Fravor and the radar data from the USS Princeton. She emphasizes the “tactical flight details,” describing how the object behaved intelligently and aggressively.

Jim Semivan and the Culture of Disbelief

Jim Semivan, a former Operations Officer for the Central Intelligence Agency, addresses the internal culture of the intelligence community. He describes a “tradition of disbelief” that was actively cultivated to discourage serious inquiry. This aligns with the historical analysis of the Robertson Panel in the 1950s, which recommended debunking UFO reports to prevent the communication channels from being clogged with false reports. Semivan argues that this manufactured stigma prevented analysts from looking at the data objectively, creating a blind spot in national intelligence.

Tim Burchett and Congressional Frustration

Tim Burchett, a US Congressman, represents the populist anger regarding the cover-up. His blunt assessment that “They are breaking the law” refers to the executive branch’s refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas and oversight requirements. Burchett has been a vocal critic of the “Pentagon Stonewall,” often using media appearances to call out specific agencies for redacting information and denying access to SCIFs (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities). His advocacy frames the issue as one of constitutional authority: the military is subordinate to the civilian government, and hiding programs from Congress is a violation of that hierarchy.

The Convergence of Testimony

The bottom section of the infographic, titled “The Convergence of Testimony,” illustrates how these disparate threads – pilots, spies, scientists, and senators – are weaving a unified narrative. The mention of Director Dan Farah hinting at imminent presidential confirmation suggests that the pressure has reached a breaking point. The text states, “The 80-year cover-up is cracking under the weight of corroborating evidence.”

This convergence is significant because it relies on cross-verification. A pilot’s sighting can be dismissed as an error. A radar track can be dismissed as a glitch. A whistleblower can be dismissed as a fabulist. But when the pilot’s visual sighting matches the radar track, and the whistleblower explains the program that studied that specific object, and the senator confirms that access to that program was illegally denied, the picture becomes cohesive.

The Implications of a Pending Disclosure Event

The infographic concludes with the notion of a “Disclosure Event (Pending).” This concept refers to a formal, executive-level acknowledgement of non-human intelligence (NHI). The implications of such an event are staggering and multifaceted.

Societal and Philosophical Impact

The confirmation of NHI would fundamentally alter humanity’s understanding of its place in the cosmos. Historical parallels are often drawn to the Copernican revolution, which displaced Earth from the center of the universe. Acknowledging that humanity is not the apex intelligence would likely trigger a re-evaluation of anthropological, religious, and philosophical frameworks. The “ontological shock” described by researchers refers to the trauma or disorientation a society feels when its reality is upended.

Technological and Economic Shifts

If the allegations regarding reverse-engineering programs are true, the release of such technology could revolutionize energy generation, transportation, and materials science. Zero-point energy or advanced propulsion systems could render fossil fuels obsolete, altering the global economic landscape. This potential for economic disruption is often cited as a reason for the continued secrecy – the “petro-dollar” economy might destabilize if free or incredibly cheap energy technologies were suddenly introduced.

National Security and Geopolitics

From a defense perspective, disclosure involves admitting that the US airspace is permeable and that there are entities operating with impunity. It also involves a geopolitical race. If the US has recovered craft, it is highly probable that rival nations like Russia or China have as well. The disclosure process involves a careful balancing act of revealing enough to satisfy the public and scientific community while not revealing specific technical capabilities that adversaries could exploit.

Legislative Momentum and the Future of Oversight

The push for transparency is now codified in law. The National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs) of recent years have included increasingly aggressive language regarding UAP. The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA), championed by Schumer and Rounds, sought to establish a review board similar to the one created for the JFK assassination files. While some provisions were watered down due to pushback from the defense intelligence establishment, the momentum remains.

The infographic references “Congressional Hearings (2023-2025),” indicating a sustained effort. These hearings serve as a mechanism to put testimony on the public record. By swearing in witnesses like Grusch, Congress creates a legal peril for lying, thereby adding weight to the claims. The continued “disinformation & compartmentalization campaign” noted in the infographic suggests a struggle between the legislative branch seeking sunlight and the executive/military branch seeking to maintain the status quo.

Summary

The attached infographic, “The Age of Disclosure,” serves as a roadmap to one of the most complex and significant stories of the modern era. It charts a path from the initial secrecy of the 1940s through the denial of the Cold War, leading to the data-driven validation of the 21st century. The individuals featured – Elizondo, Grusch, Rubio, and others – represent a cross-section of American authority, arguing that the time for secrecy has passed. Whether through the confirmation of crash retrieval programs, the validation of exotic physics, or the simple admission that humanity is not alone, the convergence of testimony indicates that the truth is no longer “out there,” but is actively arriving. The demand for transparency is not merely about curiosity; it is about restoring constitutional oversight, advancing scientific understanding, and preparing civilization for a new reality.

Appendix: Top 10 Questions Answered in This Article

What is the main topic of the attached infographic?

The infographic maps the history and key figures of the UAP disclosure movement, covering the timeline from Roswell to modern congressional hearings. It details the testimonies of whistleblowers, government officials, and scientists who allege a long-standing cover-up of non-human intelligence.

Who is David Grusch and what did he allege?

David Grusch is a former intelligence officer who testified to Congress about a secret multi-decade crash retrieval program. He alleges that the US government is in possession of non-human spacecraft and the biological remains of their pilots.

What was the role of Luis Elizondo in UAP disclosure?

Luis Elizondo served as the director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) within the Pentagon. He resigned in 2017 to protest the excessive secrecy surrounding UAP and was instrumental in releasing the famous Nimitz videos to the public.

How does the timeline describe the period between 1940 and 2020?

The timeline describes this era as an 80-year cycle of secrecy, beginning with Roswell and Project Blue Book. It characterizes the government’s stance during this time as a “Disinformation & Compartmentalization Campaign” designed to hide the truth from the public.

What is the significance of the 2004 Nimitz Incident?

The Nimitz Incident is considered a turning point because it provided corroborating data from multiple sensors (radar, visual, infrared) and credible pilot witnesses like Alex Dietrich. It forced the military to acknowledge the existence of superior aerial technology that defies known physics.

What legislative actions have been taken regarding UAP?

Legislators like Marco Rubio and Kirsten Gillibrand have pushed for laws mandating greater transparency and established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). They have also worked to pass whistleblower protection laws to allow intelligence insiders to testify without fear of reprisal.

What does the term “stove-piping” mean in this context?

Stove-piping refers to the compartmentalization of intelligence where information is kept within narrow channels to prevent oversight. Chris Mellon argues this practice is used to hide UAP programs from Congress and high-level officials who have a legal right to know.

What scientific claims do Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis make?

These scientists validate the physical reality of UAP, suggesting their flight characteristics are scientifically viable but require physics beyond current human capability. Puthoff specifically notes a concerning pattern of UAP interference around US nuclear weapons facilities.

What is the “Disclosure Event” mentioned in the infographic?

The “Disclosure Event” refers to a pending, potential confirmation by the US President or high-level officials regarding the existence of non-human intelligence. The infographic suggests this event is becoming inevitable due to the weight of converging testimony.

Why does Tim Burchett claim the Pentagon is breaking the law?

Congressman Tim Burchett argues that the Pentagon is violating the law by refusing to comply with congressional subpoenas and oversight regarding UAP programs. He believes the military is illegally withholding information from the civilian government.

Appendix: Top 10 Frequently Searched Questions Answered in This Article

What is the age of disclosure documentary?

The “Age of Disclosure” refers to a narrative and potential documentary exploring the 80-year history of UAP secrecy. It focuses on the testimonies of whistleblowers and officials who are exposing government programs related to non-human intelligence.

Who are the key UAP whistleblowers in 2025?

Key whistleblowers include David Grusch, who exposed crash retrieval programs, and Luis Elizondo, who ran the Pentagon’s UAP study. Other figures like Jay Stratton have also come forward to confirm the existence of non-human craft and biologics.

Did the US government find alien spacecraft?

According to the testimony of David Grusch and the context of the infographic, the US government has recovered non-human spacecraft. Grusch alleges these recoveries have occurred over decades and include both intact vehicles and partial debris.

What are the 5 observables of UAP?

The 5 observables, popularized by Luis Elizondo, are characteristics that define UAP: anti-gravity lift, instantaneous acceleration, hypersonic velocity without signatures, low observability (cloaking), and trans-medium travel (space to atmosphere to water).

Is Marco Rubio involved in UFO disclosure?

Yes, Marco Rubio has been a leading figure in the Senate pushing for UAP transparency. As Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, he championed legislation to protect whistleblowers and force the military to report on UAP encounters.

What did Alex Dietrich see?

Pilot Alex Dietrich witnessed the “Tic Tac” UAP during the 2004 Nimitz incident. She describes a white, oblong object moving erratically and mirroring her aircraft’s movements, demonstrating capabilities far exceeding conventional aircraft.

What is the AATIP program?

AATIP stands for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, a secret Pentagon study of UAP that ran from 2007 to 2012. It was led by Luis Elizondo and focused on assessing the national security threat posed by unidentified aerial phenomena.

Are there dead aliens in US possession?

David Grusch testified to Congress that “biologics” were recovered alongside non-human craft. He clarified that these were “non-human” remains, implying the possession of dead pilots or occupants of the crashed vehicles.

Why is Congress holding hearings on UFOs?

Congress is holding hearings to address national security concerns and constitutional oversight issues related to UAP. Lawmakers are concerned that unauthorized “black” programs are operating without congressional approval and that UAP represent a flight safety risk.

What is the difference between a UFO and a UAP?

UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object, while UAP stands for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. The government shifted to UAP to destigmatize the subject and to include objects that move through water (trans-medium) or are not strictly “flying” in the traditional sense.

KEYWORDS: Age of Disclosure, UAP Whistleblowers, David Grusch, Luis Elizondo, Crash Retrieval Program, Non-Human Intelligence, Pentagon UFO Cover-up, Marco Rubio UAP, Alien Biologics, Nimitz Incident, AATIP, UAP Disclosure Act, Congressional UFO Hearings, Jay Stratton, Eric Davis Physics, Hal Puthoff Remote Viewing, Tic Tac UFO, Project Blue Book, UAP Timeline, Disclosure Event