The Age of Disclosure: Investigating the Convergence of Government, Science, and Military Perspectives on UAP

This article is part of an ongoing series created in collaboration with the UAP News Center, a leading website for the most up-to-date UAP news and information. Visit UAP News Center for the full collection of infographics.

Key Takeaways

• Credible witnesses drive UAP policy reform.
• Legislation mandates government transparency.
• Science now analyzes UAP physical evidence.

The Age of Disclosure

The conversation surrounding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, historically marginalized as fringe pseudoscience, has undergone a radical transformation in recent years. This shift, often termed “The Age of Disclosure,” represents a concerted effort by government insiders, military witnesses, scientific experts, and legislative advocates to bring transparency to a subject long shrouded in secrecy. The movement is not defined by a single event but by a convergence of credible testimony, sensor data, and legislative action that challenges established narratives about national security and our understanding of the cosmos.

This article examines the key figures and mechanisms driving this paradigm shift. It explores the roles of intelligence officials who managed secret programs, pilots who engaged with unknown craft, scientists developing methodologies to study anomalous data, and lawmakers forcing the apparatus of the state to open its archives.

The Vanguard of Military Witnesses

The credibility of the modern UAP disclosure movement rests heavily on the testimony of military personnel who have encountered these phenomena while operating advanced sensor platforms. Unlike civilian sightings which often lack corroborating data, these encounters involve multiple observers and simultaneous detection by radar, infrared, and optical systems.

The Nimitz Encounter and Commander David Fravor

The 2004 incident involving the USS Nimitz carrier strike group serves as a cornerstone of the modern disclosure narrative. Cmdr. David Fravor (Ret.), a former Navy pilot and squadron commander of the “Black Aces,” encountered an object that defied conventional aerodynamics. During a training exercise off the coast of Southern California, Fravor and his wingman were directed to intercept a contact that had been tracked dropping from 80,000 feet to sea level in seconds.

Upon arrival, Fravor reported seeing a disturbance in the water and a white, oblong object, famously described as resembling a “Tic-Tac,” moving erratically above it. The object possessed no visible control surfaces, wings, or propulsion exhaust. As Fravor descended to engage, the object ascended to meet him, mirroring his maneuvers before accelerating away at speeds that rendered it invisible to the naked eye almost instantly. This encounter was not merely visual; it was corroborated by the immense capabilities of the United States Navy Aegis radar systems and later captured on Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR) by another flight crew.

Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich

Accompanying Fravor during the Nimitz incident was Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich (Ret.), who provided a vital corroborating perspective. While Fravor engaged the object, Dietrich remained at a higher altitude to provide overwatch. Her testimony reinforces the account of the object’s anomalous behavior and the lack of visible propulsion. The psychological and professional impact on these pilots was significant, as no formal reporting mechanism existed at the time that encouraged open discussion without fear of stigma or career repercussions. Dietrich’s willingness to speak publicly helped normalize the reporting process for other aviators.

The East Coast Sightings and Lieutenant Ryan Graves

Following the Nimitz incident, significant encounters occurred on the East Coast of the United States, particularly involving the USS Theodore Roosevelt strike group between 2014 and 2015. Lt. Ryan Graves (Ret.), an F/A-18F pilot, became a primary voice for this series of events. Graves noted that after an upgrade to their radar systems, pilots began detecting objects operating in restricted airspace on a daily basis.

These objects, some described as a “cube inside a sphere,” displayed capabilities such as remaining stationary in hurricane-force winds or accelerating to supersonic speeds without a sonic boom. Graves highlighted the safety risks these objects posed to flight crews. The consistency of these sightings over an extended period suggested a persistent presence rather than isolated anomalies. Graves later founded Americans for Safe Aerospace to advocate for pilot safety and a scientific approach to identifying these phenomena.

Captain Robert Salas and the Nuclear Connection

While recent sightings involve naval aviators, the historical context is anchored by figures like Capt. Robert Salas (Ret.). A former USAF ICBM launch officer, Salas witnessed an event at Malmstrom Air Force Base in 1967 that suggested a direct interest by UAPs in nuclear technology. During his shift, security personnel reported a glowing red object hovering over the facility. Shortly thereafter, ten Minuteman nuclear missiles went offline simultaneously. This incident, while decades old, remains central to the disclosure narrative as it implies the phenomena possess the capability to interfere with strategic defense assets.

Government and Intelligence Insiders

The transition from anecdotal military reports to official government inquiry was facilitated by insiders who worked within the intelligence community. These individuals utilized their clearances and knowledge of bureaucratic machinery to investigate UAPs from the inside and, when necessary, whistleblow regarding the lack of oversight.

Luis Elizondo and AATIP

Luis Elizondo is perhaps the most visible figure in the effort to institutionalize UAP study. As the former director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a secretive Pentagon unit, Elizondo oversaw the investigation of military UAP encounters. His work focused on the “five observables” of UAP: anti-gravity lift, sudden and instantaneous acceleration, hypersonic velocities without signatures, low observability, and trans-medium travel.

Elizondo resigned from the United States Department of Defense in 2017, citing excessive secrecy and internal opposition to the study of these aerial threats. His resignation was accompanied by the release of three now-famous UAP videos (Gimbal, Go Fast, and FLIR1), which catapulted the topic into the mainstream media. Elizondo continues to advocate for a rigorous government approach to identifying these crafts, emphasizing that they represent a potential national security issue regardless of their origin.

Christopher Mellon

Working closely with Elizondo is Christopher Mellon, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. Mellon leveraged his extensive experience in Washington to navigate the political landscape required to bring UAP information to the public and to Congress. He played a pivotal role in facilitating the release of the Navy videos and has been instrumental in drafting language for legislative efforts that mandate reporting and analysis of UAP encounters. Mellon’s argument often centers on the intelligence failure aspect; if these objects are foreign adversarial technology, it represents a massive gap in defense capabilities. If they are not human, the implications are even more significant.

David Grusch and the Whistleblower Complaint

The narrative took a dramatic turn with the emergence of David Grusch, a former intelligence officer and representative to the UAP Task Force from the National Reconnaissance Office. Grusch filed a formal whistleblower complaint alleging the existence of a decades-long, crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program involving non-human technical vehicles.

Grusch testified under oath before Congress that he was denied access to these “legacy programs” despite his high-level clearances. He asserted that the U.S. government is in possession of “intact and partially intact” craft of non-human origin and “biologics” recovered from crash sites. His claims, while extraordinary, were deemed “credible and urgent” by the Intelligence Community Inspector General, leading to closed-door briefings for lawmakers.

Karl Nell and the UAP Task Force

Supporting the need for serious inquiry is Karl Nell, a retired Army Colonel and former advisor to the UAP Task Force. Nell has publicly supported Grusch’s character and the validity of the investigation into retrieved materials. His background in modernization and high-tech defense systems adds weight to the assertion that the observed technologies do not originate from the current military-industrial complex of the United States or its near-peer adversaries.

The Scientific and Academic Approach

For disclosure to move beyond speculation, rigorous scientific methodology is required. A group of academics and scientists have been working, often in partnership with government programs, to analyze the physical and biological evidence associated with UAP events.

Dr. Gary Nolan and Materials Analysis

Dr. Gary Nolan, a Professor of Pathology at Stanford University, brings world-class credentials to the study of UAP. Nolan has applied his expertise in immunology and genetics to analyze potential physical evidence. This includes the study of materials allegedly recovered from UAP events, using mass spectrometry to look for anomalous isotope ratios that would indicate engineered manufacturing processes not standard on Earth.

Nolan has also investigated the medical effects on military personnel who have come into close proximity with UAPs. His research into MRI scans of pilots and intelligence officers reportedly showed damage or changes in the caudate putamen and white matter similar to multiple sclerosis or radiation burns, suggesting that the propulsion or energy systems of these craft produce harmful byproducts.

Dr. Hal Puthoff and Advanced Physics

Dr. Hal Puthoff, a physicist with a history of working on classified government projects including the remote viewing “Stargate Project,” has been a longtime theorist on the mechanics of UAP propulsion. As a contractor for AATIP, Puthoff authored technical papers exploring concepts like spacetime metric engineering. His work attempts to provide a theoretical framework for how a craft could exhibit the “five observables,” particularly instant acceleration and lack of sonic booms, by manipulating the vacuum energy or the spacetime metric around the vehicle.

Dr. Eric Davis

Dr. Eric Davis is an astrophysicist who served as a contractor and consultant for the Pentagon’s UAP programs. Davis is known for the “Admiral Wilson Memo,” a controversial document describing an alleged meeting where he was informed about buried special access programs related to UFO crash retrievals. Davis has briefed congressional committees and continues to advocate for the scientific study of the phenomenon, arguing that the physics displayed represents a quantum leap beyond current human capability.

Legislative Advocates and Political Will

The pressure for disclosure has found a powerful outlet in the United States Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have championed legislation to strip away the secrecy and force the defense establishment to report its findings to the public.

Harry Reid’s Legacy

The late Senator Harry Reid, former Senate Majority Leader, was the initial political engine behind modern UAP studies. Reid secretly secured funding to establish AATIP in 2007, recognizing that the phenomena were ignored at the nation’s peril. His willingness to spend political capital on the issue paved the way for the current generation of legislators to take up the torch.

Senators Rubio, Gillibrand, and Rounds

The contemporary legislative push is bipartisan. Senator Marco Rubio, as Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, has successfully inserted language into Intelligence Authorization Acts requiring detailed reports on UAP. He has expressed concern that UAPs operate with impunity in U.S. airspace.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has been a primary architect of the amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). Her legislative efforts focus on creating a secure pathway for whistleblowers to report what they know without violating their non-disclosure agreements, theoretically preventing the loss of critical historical data.

Senator Mike Rounds joins this coalition, emphasizing the need for data to determine if these objects are foreign adversaries or something else entirely. The legislative branch has effectively signaled that “ignoring it” is no longer an acceptable strategy for the Pentagon.

The Mechanisms of Disclosure

The interplay between these groups – witnesses, insiders, scientists, and legislators – has created a mechanism that forces information to the surface. It operates through a cycle of leaking, reporting, and legislating.

The process often begins with a military witness experiencing an event. This event is recorded on sensors. Insiders like Elizondo or Stratton identify the event as anomalous. If the system blocks investigation, figures like Mellon assist in bringing the data to the press or Congress. The public outcry following media reports empowers legislators like Gillibrand to draft laws compelling the Department of Defense to release more information. This cycle repeats, with each iteration drilling deeper into the accumulated secrecy of the past seventy years.

The Role of AARO

The establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) marks a significant bureaucratic victory. Unlike task forces, AARO has a mandate established by law to synchronize efforts across the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. It is tasked with detecting, identifying, and attributing objects of interest in, on, or near military installations, operating areas, training areas, special use airspace, and other areas of interest. While AARO has faced criticism from the pro-disclosure community for its slow pace and initial dismissals of extraterrestrial hypotheses, its very existence serves as a formal admission that the phenomenon requires a permanent investigative body.

Challenges to Transparency

Despite the progress, significant hurdles remain. The classification system of the United States government is compartmentalized. “Need to know” restrictions often prevent even high-ranking officials from accessing specific Special Access Programs (SAPs). This “stovepiping” of information makes it difficult to assemble a complete picture. Furthermore, there is institutional resistance to admitting that the government may not have control over its own airspace, or that it has potentially misled the public for decades regarding the nature of reality.

The intelligence community also guards its “sources and methods” fiercely. Releasing high-resolution sensor data of a UAP might inadvertently reveal the specific frequency resolutions of a spy satellite or the tracking capabilities of a naval radar, giving adversaries insight into U.S. vulnerabilities. This tension between national security (protecting sensor capabilities) and public interest (revealing the UAP reality) is the central friction point of the disclosure process.

Summary

The “Age of Disclosure” is not a passive event but an active struggle for information. It is defined by the courage of pilots like David Fravor and Ryan Graves who risked their reputations to report what they saw. It is propelled by insiders like Luis Elizondo and David Grusch who sacrificed careers to expose internal obfuscation. It is validated by scientists like Gary Nolan and Hal Puthoff who apply rigor to the unexplained. Finally, it is codified by legislators like Kirsten Gillibrand and Marco Rubio who are writing the laws that make secrecy illegal. The convergence of these forces suggests that the question is no longer if disclosure will happen, but how the confirmed reality of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena will reshape humanity’s understanding of its place in the universe.

Appendix: Top 10 Questions Answered in This Article

Who are the key military witnesses driving UAP disclosure?

The article highlights Cmdr. David Fravor, Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich, Lt. Ryan Graves, and Capt. Robert Salas. These individuals provided credible, sensor-backed testimony regarding encounters with the “Tic-Tac” object, cube-within-sphere objects, and nuclear facility incursions.

What was the “Tic-Tac” incident?

This incident occurred in 2004 involving the USS Nimitz carrier group, where pilots intercepted a white, oblong object with no wings or propulsion. The object demonstrated capabilities such as instantaneous acceleration and dropping from 80,000 feet to sea level in seconds, as recorded by radar and FLIR.

What role did Luis Elizondo play in the disclosure movement?

Luis Elizondo served as the director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). He resigned in 2017 to protest excessive secrecy and helped release three confirmed U.S. Navy videos showing UAPs, sparking global interest and legislative action.

What are the “Five Observables” of UAP?

The five observables, popularized by Elizondo, include anti-gravity lift, sudden and instantaneous acceleration, hypersonic velocities without signatures (like sonic booms), low observability (stealth), and trans-medium travel (moving between space, air, and water).

What did David Grusch allege in his whistleblower complaint?

David Grusch alleged that the U.S. government operates a longstanding, secret crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program for non-human spacecraft. He testified under oath that he was denied access to these programs and that “biologics” were recovered alongside the craft.

How are scientists like Dr. Gary Nolan contributing to UAP study?

Dr. Gary Nolan uses advanced mass spectrometry to analyze materials for anomalous isotope ratios that might indicate engineered origins. He also studies the medical effects on personnel who have come close to UAPs, identifying brain damage patterns similar to radiation or Havana syndrome.

What is the significance of the “Admiral Wilson Memo”?

The memo serves as a controversial document associated with Dr. Eric Davis. It allegedly details a meeting where Davis was informed about deeply buried Special Access Programs related to UFO crash retrievals that were hidden from proper oversight.

How has Congress responded to the UAP issue?

Congress, led by Senators like Gillibrand and Rubio, passed legislation to establish the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). They have also included provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act to protect whistleblowers and mandate reports on UAP activity.

What is the connection between UAPs and nuclear facilities?

Historical accounts, such as the 1967 incident at Malmstrom AFB witnessed by Capt. Robert Salas, suggest a pattern of UAP interest in nuclear sites. During the Malmstrom event, ten nuclear missiles reportedly went offline simultaneously while a UAP hovered overhead.

Why is it difficult to get full transparency from the government?

Transparency is hindered by the need to protect sensitive sources and methods, such as spy satellite capabilities. Additionally, the compartmentalization of information (stovepiping) prevents officials from seeing the full picture, and there is institutional resistance to admitting a lack of air superiority.

Appendix: Top 10 Frequently Searched Questions Answered in This Article

What is the difference between UFO and UAP?

UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object, while UAP stands for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. The government shifted to using UAP to remove the stigma associated with “flying saucers” and to broaden the definition to include objects that move through water or space, not just the air.

Is there proof that aliens exist?

While credible witnesses and whistleblowers like David Grusch allege the recovery of “non-human” biologics and craft, the government has not officially confirmed the existence of extraterrestrial life. The article details the testimony and sensors that prove the objects are real, but their origin remains a subject of investigation.

Who is the whistleblower that testified about UFOs in 2023?

David Grusch is the primary intelligence official who testified before Congress in 2023. He claimed that the U.S. has been retrieving and reverse-engineering unidentified craft for decades without congressional oversight.

What did the Navy pilots see in 2004?

Navy pilots Commander David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich saw a white object shaped like a “Tic-Tac” hovering over the water. It mirrored their movements and accelerated away at speeds impossible for known human technology, all while being tracked by advanced radar systems.

What is the AARO office?

AARO stands for the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office. It is a government office established within the Department of Defense to synchronize the investigation of UAPs across all military and intelligence agencies and report findings to Congress.

Why are UAPs considered a national security threat?

UAPs are considered a threat because they operate with impunity in restricted U.S. airspace, often near sensitive military sites. If they are foreign adversaries, they represent a massive intelligence failure; if they are unknown, they represent an unpredictable variable in flight safety and defense.

Can UAPs go underwater?

Yes, one of the “five observables” is trans-medium travel. This means the objects have been observed moving from space to the atmosphere and into the ocean without changing shape or losing speed, as noted in the context of the Nimitz encounter.

Who is investigating UAPs now?

Investigation is currently being handled by the government office AARO, as well as independent scientific groups and academics like Dr. Gary Nolan at Stanford. Various non-profits founded by former pilots, such as Americans for Safe Aerospace, are also investigating flight safety aspects.

What are metamaterials in the context of UAPs?

Metamaterials refer to physical debris or fragments allegedly recovered from UAP sites that are being analyzed by scientists. Researchers look for isotopic ratios or structural engineering at the atomic level that cannot be manufactured using current terrestrial techniques.

Why did Luis Elizondo resign from the Pentagon?

Luis Elizondo resigned to protest the excessive secrecy and internal bureaucratic opposition that hampered the AATIP program. He felt the issue was not being taken seriously enough by the Department of Defense leadership despite the potential threat to national security.