Famous US Military UAP Encounters

This article is part of an ongoing series created in collaboration with the UAP News Center, a leading website for the most up-to-date UAP news and information. Visit UAP News Center for the full collection of infographics.

Key Takeaways

• Military sensors validated UAP performance data.
• Stigma reduction enabled pilot reporting systems.
• AARO now leads centralized UAP investigations.

Introduction to Modern Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena

The subject of unidentified flying objects, historically dismissed as fringe science or folklore, underwent a paradigm shift in the early 21st century. This shift was not driven by civilian sightings or grainy amateur footage, but by corroborating data from the world’s most advanced military sensor platforms. The reclassification of these objects from UFOs to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) signals a move toward rigorous scientific and defense-based analysis. The Department of Defense and intelligence communities have acknowledged that these phenomena represent physical objects that traverse the sky – and occasionally water – with performance characteristics that currently defy conventional aerodynamic understanding.

This transition from secrecy to public acknowledgment is anchored by specific encounters involving US Navy carrier strike groups. These incidents, occurring off the coasts of California and the Eastern United States, provided the first publicly verified data combining visual pilot testimony with advanced radar and infrared imaging. The subsequent release of this data forced a re-evaluation of airspace security and led to the establishment of permanent government offices dedicated to resolving these anomalies.

The USS Nimitz Encounter (2004)

In November 2004, the Carrier Strike Group 11, led by the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Nimitz, was conducting training exercises approximately 100 miles southwest of San Diego. This event, now known as the “Tic Tac” incident, serves as the foundational case for modern UAP studies due to the credibility of the observers and the multi-sensor data obtained.

The Radar Anomalies

Days before the visual encounter, the USS Princeton, a Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser accompanying the Nimitz, began tracking mysterious contacts on its SPY-1B radar system. Fire Controlmen and radar operators observed objects appearing at altitudes exceeding 80,000 feet – essentially the edge of space. These objects would plummet toward the ocean surface in seconds, hovering aggressively at low altitudes before shooting back up or disappearing from radar coverage.

The operators initially suspected a system malfunction. The radar system was taken offline and recalibrated to rule out “ghost tracks” or software glitches. When the system came back online, the contacts remained. The objects displayed ballistic missile-class speed but did not produce the heat signatures or sonic booms associated with such propulsion.

The Intercept

On November 14, 2004, David Fravor, the commanding officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41 (VFA-41), and Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich were piloting F/A-18F Super Hornets during a training mission. The USS Princeton directed them to a coordinate where the radar contacts were stationary.

Upon arrival, the pilots observed an area of churning white water in an otherwise calm ocean, suggesting a large object was submerged or hovering just above the surface. Hovering roughly 50 feet above this disturbance was a white, oblong object described as resembling a “Tic Tac” mint. The object had no visible wings, rotors, exhaust plumes, or control surfaces. It was approximately 40 feet long, roughly the size of a fighter jet.

As Fravor descended to investigate, the object mirrored his movements. As the pilot attempted to cut across the circle to close the distance, the object accelerated with immense speed, vanishing from sight in less than a second. It did not merely outrun the jets; it disappeared from the visual arena instantly. Moments later, the USS Princeton confirmed that the object had reappeared at the pilots’ “cap point” – a predetermined rendezvous location 60 miles away. The object traveled that distance in a timeframe that implies hypersonic velocity, yet without a sonic boom.

The FLIR Evidence

Following Fravor’s return to the carrier, a second flight launched equipped with an Advanced Targeting Forward-Looking Infrared (ATFLIR) pod. This crew managed to capture the object on video. The resulting footage, known as the “FLIR1” video, shows the oblong object hovering in place before darting out of the frame with high acceleration. The lack of exhaust heat in the infrared spectrum remains a primary point of technical interest.

The USS Theodore Roosevelt Encounters (2014-2015)

A decade after the Nimitz incident, a different carrier strike group experienced a prolonged series of interactions with UAP. Pilots flying from the USS Theodore Roosevelt reported near-daily encounters with unknown objects off the US East Coast, ranging from Virginia to Florida.

Technological Context: The Radar Upgrade

The frequency of these sightings coincided with a significant upgrade to the F/A-18’s sensor suite. The aircraft had recently been equipped with the APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar. This advanced system provided pilots with higher fidelity situational awareness, allowing them to detect smaller objects at greater distances than previous mechanical radars.

Almost immediately after the upgrade, pilots began picking up solid contacts that did not behave like conventional aircraft. Initially, crews suspected the new radar was generating false tracks. However, visual confirmations soon followed the radar locks.

Descriptions of the Objects

Unlike the singular white “Tic Tac” seen by the Nimitz group, the Roosevelt pilots described a variety of shapes. One of the most distinct descriptions came from pilot Ryan Graves, who reported seeing a “cube inside of a sphere.” This geometric anomaly was described as a dark cube encased within a translucent sphere, flying in formation with other objects or stationary against hurricane-force winds.

These objects displayed the ability to remain stationary in high winds aloft, a feat that would require significant energy expenditure for a conventional aircraft (like a helicopter or drone) to maintain position. They also demonstrated the capacity to loiter for durations that exceeded the fuel reserves of known tactical aircraft.

The Gimbal and GoFast Videos

Two primary videos emerged from the Roosevelt encounters, recorded by the ATFLIR pods:

• Gimbal: This footage shows a saucer-like object with a small protrusion flying against the wind. The pilots can be heard on the audio discussing the fleet of objects on the situational awareness display. Toward the end of the clip, the object rotates nearly 90 degrees without losing momentum or altitude, a maneuver that defies the aerodynamics of lifting bodies.
• GoFast: This clip captures a smaller object skimming the surface of the ocean at high speed. The sensor lock struggles to capture the target as it zips across the water.

Scientific Analysis of Observed Behaviors

The observations from these encounters have led to the categorization of UAP behaviors into distinct “observables.” These characteristics help differentiate UAP from conventional aerospace technology, drones, or natural atmospheric phenomena.

Anti-Gravity Lift

In both the Nimitz and Roosevelt cases, the objects displayed no visible means of propulsion or lift. Conventional aircraft rely on wings to generate lift through airspeed (Bernoulli’s principle) or downward thrust (rotors/jets). The “Tic Tac” and the “Sphere-in-Cube” maintained altitude without wings or visible rotors, suggesting a mechanism that negates or interacts with gravity differently than known physics allows.

Instantaneous Acceleration

The radar data from the USS Princeton and the visual testimony of the pilots suggest the objects possess low mass or high energy capabilities. The acceleration observed – going from a hover to hypersonic speeds almost instantly – would subject any biological pilot to fatal g-forces (g-loading). The structural integrity of known airframes would likely fail under such stress.

Hypersonic Velocity without Signatures

Objects traveling above Mach 1 (the speed of sound) generate sonic booms and significant heat due to air friction. The UAP tracked by the Navy achieved these speeds without producing the acoustic shockwave or the thermal signature associated with high-speed friction. This has led to hypotheses regarding the manipulation of the medium around the object, rather than traditional propulsion through the medium.

Trans-Medium Travel

Some reports, particularly surrounding the Nimitz incident and subsequent Navy investigations, indicate that these objects can operate in multiple domains. They have been observed descending from space (low earth orbit altitudes), maneuvering in the atmosphere, and potentially entering the ocean without splashing or structural damage. A vehicle optimized for space travel (vacuum) is rarely aerodynamic enough for atmospheric flight, and certainly not hydrodynamic enough for underwater movement.

Government Response and Institutionalization

The path from the 2004 encounters to present-day legislation reveals a slow but steady erosion of the stigma surrounding UAP. For years, pilots were hesitant to report sightings for fear of losing flight status or facing ridicule. The release of the videos and the testimony of credible witnesses forced the US government to formalize its inquiry.

The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP)

Revealed by the New York Times in 2017, AATIP was a secretive program funded by the Department of Defense to investigate these phenomena. Although the program officially ended in 2012, proponents argued that the investigation continued under different guises. The revelation of AATIP’s existence proved that the Pentagon took the matter seriously enough to allocate funding and resources.

The UAP Task Force (UAPTF)

Following the public confirmation of the Navy videos in 2020, the Department of Defense established the UAP Task Force. Its primary mandate was to standardize the collection and reporting of sightings. The UAPTF produced the “Preliminary Assessment” in 2021, a landmark document that analyzed 144 reports. Of these, only one could be explained (a deflating balloon). The rest remained unidentified, with the report acknowledging that some UAP appeared to demonstrate advanced technology.

The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO)

In 2022, the efforts were consolidated into the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). Established within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, AARO represents the highest level of formalized government study into UAP. Its mission encompasses not just aerial objects, but anomalies in space and underwater domains. AARO is tasked with synchronizing efforts across the Department of Defense and other federal agencies to detect, identify, and attribute these objects.

Skeptical Analysis and Explanations

While the pilot testimonies and sensor data are compelling, rigorous scientific inquiry demands the consideration of prosaic explanations. Independent analysts and skeptics have proposed several theories to account for the footage and radar data.

Parallax Effect

Regarding the “GoFast” video, skeptics argue that the sensation of extreme speed is an optical illusion caused by the parallax effect. Because the jet is flying high and the camera is zoomed in on an object closer to the water, the background ocean appears to rush by, making the object seem to move faster than it is. Trigonometric analysis by some civilian researchers suggests the object may be moving at wind speed, consistent with a balloon or drone.

Rotating Glare

For the “Gimbal” video, technical analysis of the infrared system suggests that the apparent rotation of the object might be a rotation of the camera’s internal glare mechanism. As the camera gimbal rotates to track the target, the lens flare (caused by a hot heat source like a distant engine) rotates with it, creating the illusion that the physical object is turning.

Radar Glitches and Electronic Warfare

Some defense analysts propose that the radar “ghosts” could be the result of advanced electronic warfare (EW) testing. It is possible that the US Navy was encountering spoofing technology – either from a foreign adversary or a classified US program – designed to trick radar into seeing fleet-sized formations that do not physically exist. This would explain the radar returns but does not fully account for the visual sightings by pilots of physical objects.

National Security and Flight Safety

Regardless of the origin of UAP – whether they are extraterrestrial, foreign adversarial technology, or unknown natural phenomena – the Department of Defense views them primarily through the lens of safety and security.

The Hazard of Clutter

The presence of unauthorized, unidentified physical objects in military training ranges poses a severe flight safety risk. Pilots training for combat operate at high speeds and under high cognitive load. An object hovering in a designated flight lane can cause a mid-air collision. Reports indicate that pilots have had “near misses” with these objects, necessitating a reporting system that prioritizes safety over stigma.

The Intelligence Gap

If the objects are foreign drones or reconnaissance platforms (e.g., from China or Russia), they represent a catastrophic intelligence failure. The ability of an adversary to penetrate restricted US airspace with impunity and operate without detection implies a technology gap that needs immediate rectification. This “domain awareness gap” drives much of the funding and legislative support for AARO.

Summary

The narrative of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena has evolved from anecdotal folklore to a verified national security issue. The encounters involving the USS Nimitz and USS Theodore Roosevelt provided the data necessary to force this transition. While the origin of these objects remains unknown, the confirmation of their performance characteristics – instantaneous acceleration, trans-medium travel, and hypersonic velocity – challenges current engineering paradigms. The establishment of AARO ensures that future incidents will be investigated with scientific rigor, moving the conversation from speculation to data-driven analysis.

Appendix: Top 10 Questions Answered in This Article

What was the “Tic Tac” incident?

The Tic Tac incident occurred in 2004 when pilots from the USS Nimitz carrier group visually identified and tracked a white, oblong object off the coast of California. The object demonstrated capabilities that defied conventional aerodynamics, such as instantaneous acceleration and lack of visible propulsion.

What is the “Cube in a Sphere” UAP?

Ryan Graves, a pilot from the USS Theodore Roosevelt, described seeing objects resembling a dark cube encased in a clear sphere. These objects were observed flying in formation and remaining stationary against hurricane-force winds during training exercises between 2014 and 2015.

What is the difference between AATIP and AARO?

AATIP was a secretive program (2007-2012) focused on identifying advanced aerospace threats, while AARO (2022-Present) is the current, official public office for all-domain anomaly resolution. AARO has a broader mandate to investigate anomalies in space, air, and underwater, and reports directly to Congress.

Why did the government change the term from UFO to UAP?

The term was changed to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena to remove the cultural stigma associated with “UFOs” and “flying saucers.” The new terminology also broadens the scope to include objects observed in water and space, not just the atmosphere.

What are the “Five Observables” of UAP?

The five observables are anti-gravity lift, instantaneous acceleration, hypersonic velocity without signatures, low observability to sensors, and trans-medium travel. These characteristics help distinguish true anomalies from conventional aircraft or drones.

What does the “Gimbal” video show?

The Gimbal video, recorded by a Navy F/A-18, shows a saucer-shaped object flying against high winds. The object appears to rotate on its axis while maintaining its trajectory, a maneuver that is difficult for conventional aircraft to perform without losing lift.

Are the UAP sightings confirmed by radar?

Yes, in incidents like the Nimitz encounter, the USS Princeton’s SPY-1 radar tracked objects descending from 80,000 feet to sea level in seconds. These radar returns corroborated the visual sightings made by the pilots.

What is the skeptics’ explanation for the “GoFast” video?

Skeptics argue that the “GoFast” video demonstrates the parallax effect, where the object appears to move incredibly fast due to the speed of the jet and the camera angle. Trigonometric analysis suggests the object might actually be moving at a much slower wind speed.

Why is UAP considered a flight safety issue?

UAP operate in restricted military airspace without communicating with air traffic control or emitting transponder signals. This creates a high risk of mid-air collisions with military aircraft conducting high-speed training maneuvers.

Has the government found evidence of extraterrestrial life?

The official position of AARO and the Department of Defense is that there is currently no verifiable evidence that UAP represent extraterrestrial technology. However, a significant percentage of cases remain unresolved and unexplained due to a lack of sufficient data.

Appendix: Top 10 Frequently Searched Questions Answered in This Article

What does UAP stand for?

UAP stands for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. It is the updated terminology used by the military and government to describe unidentified objects in the sky, sea, or space.

Is the Tic Tac UFO video real?

Yes, the “FLIR1” video showing the Tic Tac object was officially released by the Department of Defense and confirmed as authentic Navy footage. It captures the object encountered by Commander David Fravor in 2004.

Who is David Fravor?

Commander David Fravor is a retired US Navy pilot who served as the commanding officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41. He is the primary eyewitness to the 2004 Nimitz “Tic Tac” encounter and has testified before Congress regarding the event.

What did Ryan Graves see?

Ryan Graves, a former Navy Lieutenant, reported seeing UAP on a near-daily basis off the East Coast. He described the objects as distinct geometric shapes, such as a cube inside a sphere, capable of loitering for hours in high winds.

How fast do UAP go?

Radar data from the Nimitz incident tracked objects dropping from 80,000 feet to sea level in less than a second. This implies velocities well into the hypersonic range (above Mach 5), far exceeding the capabilities of known aircraft in those conditions.

What is the AARO report?

The AARO report refers to the periodic updates provided by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office to Congress. These reports summarize current investigations, total case numbers, and the percentage of cases that have been resolved as balloons, drones, or clutter.

Why are UAP sightings mostly over water?

Most military UAP sightings occur over water because that is where carrier strike groups conduct training exercises using advanced sensor arrays. The lack of ground clutter over the ocean also makes it easier for radar to pick up anomalous contacts.

Can UAP go underwater?

Yes, the concept of “trans-medium travel” suggests that some UAP can transition from the atmosphere into the ocean without apparent difficulty. Reports from the Nimitz incident described the object hovering over churning water, implying interaction with the surface or a submerged object.

Are UAP Russian or Chinese drones?

While some UAP reports have been attributed to foreign surveillance drones, many display performance characteristics (like lack of control surfaces or exhaust) that do not match known Russian or Chinese technology. However, foreign surveillance remains a primary investigation avenue for the Pentagon.

What is the Mick West debunking theory?

Mick West is a prominent skeptic who analyzes UAP videos using mathematics and optical principles. He posits that many famous videos, like Gimbal and GoFast, can be explained by camera artifacts, glare, parallax, and balloon-like objects rather than advanced physics.