From Tic-Tacs to Triangles: A Complete Guide to UAP Shapes and Types

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

From Flying Saucers to Anomalous Phenomena

For as long as humans have looked to the skies, they have witnessed things they could not explain. Ancient Roman historians recorded accounts of “phantom ships” gleaming in the heavens. Medieval chronicles and Renaissance art contain depictions of strange objects accompanying celestial or religious events. This long history of skygazing forms the backdrop for a modern phenomenon that captured the public imagination in the mid-20th century and continues to challenge scientific and military understanding today: the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon, or UAP.

The journey of this subject in the public lexicon is a story in itself, reflecting a gradual and deliberate shift in official posture. The term that started it all, “flying saucer,” was born from a media misinterpretation in 1947. When the United States Air Force began its formal investigations into these sightings, it quickly realized that “saucer” was far too specific for the bewildering variety of shapes being reported by credible witnesses. To create a more general and neutral category for its case files, the Air Force coined the term “Unidentified Flying Object,” or UFO. For over 70 years, UFO was the standard, a word that became synonymous with everything from distant lights to speculative tales of extraterrestrial visitation.

In recent years a new term has entered the official vocabulary: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). This change, championed by the U.S. Department of Defense and the intelligence community, is more than just a semantic update. It represents a strategic reframing of the entire subject. The term “UAP” intentionally broadens the scope of inquiry. It acknowledges that some events may not be discrete “objects” at all, but rather ethereal “phenomena.” It also removes the limitation of “flying,” officially recognizing that these phenomena have been observed operating in space and, perhaps most significantly, moving seamlessly between the air and the water – so-called trans-medium travel.

This terminological evolution serves a dual purpose. It helps to destigmatize the topic, encouraging military pilots and other trained observers to report unusual sightings without fear of ridicule or career damage, reframing the issue as a matter of flight safety and national security. It also provides a more accurate and flexible framework for a phenomenon that stubbornly resists simple categorization. The 2021 report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence stated that UAP “probably lack a single explanation,” a conclusion necessitated by the sheer diversity of the data.

Faced with this diversity, the most fundamental way to begin organizing and understanding decades of reports is through morphology – the study of an object’s form and structure. Shape is often the first and most distinct detail a witness can provide. Over the decades, a clear taxonomy of recurring shapes has emerged from the thousands of reports filed by civilians, pilots, and military personnel. These are not random, one-off descriptions; they are patterns of specific forms, seen repeatedly across different decades and continents.

This article provides a guide to that taxonomy. It explores the most commonly reported UAP shapes, from the classic discs that defined the early era to the silent, menacing triangles that dominate modern sightings. It examines the unique flight characteristics associated with these objects, which often prove more anomalous than their shapes. By cataloging these forms and delving into the key cases that define them, we can begin to map the boundaries of this enduring mystery, moving from simple observation to a more structured understanding of what, exactly, is in our skies.

The Foundational Shapes: Icons of the Skies

Before the modern era of military sensor data and government task forces, the UAP phenomenon was largely defined by two archetypal shapes that captured the public’s imagination and set the stage for all that followed. The flying saucer became a global icon, a symbol of otherworldly mystery, while the less-common but equally persistent cigar shape hinted at a history of sightings that predated the 20th century. These foundational morphologies established the visual language of the phenomenon and are central to understanding its evolution.

To provide a clear overview of the most significant UAP morphologies discussed in this article, the following table summarizes their key characteristics and associated cases. It serves as a quick-reference guide to the diverse forms that have been reported over the decades.

The Classic Disc and Saucer

The “flying saucer” is, without question, the most iconic and culturally significant UAP shape. For decades, it was the default image for any unexplained object in the sky, a visual shorthand for alien visitation that permeated science fiction, news reports, and popular culture. Its form is deceptively simple, yet the consistency of its description across thousands of reports is remarkable.

The classic saucer is typically described as a circular or elliptical object, often with a domed cupola on top and a flatter bottom, resembling two plates joined at the rim. Witnesses frequently report a smooth, seamless surface with a metallic or silvery sheen that reflects sunlight. Some accounts describe lights, either as a steady glow, a rotating series of colored lights around the perimeter, or porthole-like windows. The size of these reported discs varies enormously, from small, drone-sized objects just a few feet across to massive craft estimated to be thousands of feet in diameter.

Their reported flight characteristics are as distinctive as their shape. A key feature is silent operation. Witnesses often note the complete absence of engine noise, even when the object is seen hovering at low altitude. This silence is often paired with extraordinary maneuverability. Saucers are described as being capable of hovering motionless for extended periods before accelerating to incredible speeds in an instant. They perform sharp, angular turns and changes in direction that defy the principles of conventional aerodynamics and inertia. While early reports from the 1940s and 50s often emphasized their tremendous speed, later accounts increasingly focused on their ability to hover silently, a behavior that is just as technologically challenging.

The origin of this archetype is a fascinating story of observation, media interpretation, and cultural feedback. The term “flying saucer” entered the global lexicon on June 24, 1947. On that day, a private pilot and businessman named Kenneth Arnold was flying his small plane near Mount Rainier in Washington. He witnessed a formation of nine incredibly fast, bright objects flying in a chain. He described them as being crescent-shaped or like a “heel of a shoe,” with a rounded front and a pointed back. When trying to explain their motion to a reporter, he said they moved erratically, “like a saucer if you skip it across the water.” A journalist for the East Oregonian newspaper, in a moment of journalistic simplification, reported that Arnold had seen “saucer-like aircraft.” The Associated Press picked up the story, and the term “flying saucer” was born.

This media error proved to be a powerful catalyst. Arnold’s sighting ignited a firestorm of public interest, and in the weeks that followed, over 800 “flying saucer” sightings were reported across the United States, including the famous Roswell incident in July 1947. The image of a disc-shaped craft was already present in the pulp science fiction magazines of the 1930s, creating a fertile ground in the public imagination. The media’s coining of the term provided a powerful, ready-made label for what people were seeing, or what they thought they were seeing. This created a feedback loop: the media reported on saucers, which led more people to interpret ambiguous lights or objects as saucers, which in turn generated more saucer reports. For decades, this shape became the dominant UAP morphology, whether because such objects were genuinely prevalent or because the cultural narrative powerfully shaped witness perception.

Even with this cultural context, reports of disc-shaped objects have continued into the modern era, with some sightings being particularly difficult to dismiss. One of the most compelling modern cases occurred on November 7, 2006, at one of the world’s busiest airports: Chicago O’Hare International. Around 4:15 p.m., a ramp worker pushing back a United Airlines flight noticed a dark gray, metallic, saucer-shaped object hovering silently over Gate C-17. Over the next five minutes, at least a dozen United Airlines employees – including pilots, mechanics, and supervisors – witnessed the craft.

Their descriptions were consistent: a solid, metallic disc, estimated to be between 6 and 24 feet in diameter, hovering just below the 1,900-foot cloud ceiling. It made no sound. After several minutes, multiple witnesses saw it shoot straight up into the sky at an incredible speed, punching a perfectly circular hole in the cloud layer above it. The hole was reportedly visible for several minutes before dissipating. Despite these multiple, credible witnesses from the aviation industry, the object was not detected by airport radar, and no air traffic controllers in the tower reported seeing it.

Initially, both United Airlines and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) denied having any record of the incident. It was only after the Chicago Tribune filed a Freedom of Information Act request that the FAA released a recording of a United supervisor calling the tower to report the object. The FAA’s official conclusion was that the sighting was likely a “weather phenomenon,” possibly a rare formation known as a “hole-punch cloud.” This explanation was rejected by the witnesses, who were adamant they had seen a solid, structured, metallic craft under intelligent control. The O’Hare incident stands as a prime example of the enduring mystery of the classic saucer, highlighting the stark conflict that can arise between direct, multi-witness testimony and official explanations that struggle to account for all the reported facts.

The Elongated Enigma: Cigars and Cylinders

While the flying saucer became the celebrity of the UAP world, another, more ancient shape has been reported with quiet persistence for over a century: the cigar or cylinder. These elongated, wingless objects represent one of the oldest and most consistent UAP morphologies, with reports dating back to a time before the invention of the airplane itself.

Descriptions of these objects are remarkably uniform across different eras. They are typically characterized as long, cylindrical craft with a smooth, seamless surface. Many reports describe them as metallic, though some mention a dull, non-reflective finish. A defining feature is the complete lack of conventional aerodynamic surfaces; they have no wings, fins, tails, or visible engines. Some accounts note that the ends of the cylinder are rounded or tapered. Their size is often reported to be immense, far larger than conventional aircraft.

Their flight behavior is similar to that of discs, including silent operation, hovering, and the ability to travel at extreme speeds. A unique characteristic sometimes associated with cigar-shaped UAP is their role as a potential “mothership.” In some sightings, witnesses have reported seeing smaller objects, particularly orbs, emerging from or returning to the larger cylindrical craft, suggesting it may function as a carrier vehicle.

The history of this shape predates the modern UAP era. In the late 19th century, from 1896 to 1897, a wave of sightings of “mystery airships” swept across the United States. Long before the Wright brothers’ first flight, thousands of people reported seeing large, powered aircraft in the night sky. The most common descriptions were of a dark, cigar-shaped body, often with bright searchlights and, in some accounts, wings or propellers. While many of these reports were likely hoaxes or misidentifications fueled by the excitement over the coming age of aviation, the core description of a large, elongated, powered craft established the cigar as a foundational UAP archetype. When similar shapes were reported in the 20th and 21st centuries, they were stripped of their 19th-century technological trappings like propellers, but the fundamental cylindrical form remained.

This long history of sightings took a surprising turn in 2017 with a discovery from the field of astronomy. On October 19, 2017, the Pan-STARRS telescope in Hawaii detected an object moving through our solar system on a trajectory that indicated it had come from interstellar space. It was the first confirmed interstellar visitor ever detected. Named ‘Oumuamua, Hawaiian for “a messenger from afar arriving first,” the object was unlike anything seen before.

Data revealed ‘Oumuamua to be a dense, rocky or metallic object with a reddish hue, but its most startling feature was its shape. It was highly elongated, estimated to be up to ten times as long as it was wide – a cosmic cigar. Furthermore, as it moved away from the Sun, it exhibited a slight non-gravitational acceleration, a gentle push that could not be explained by gravity alone. In comets, this is caused by outgassing of ice and dust, but ‘Oumuamua had no visible coma or tail.

While the vast majority of astronomers have concluded that ‘Oumuamua was a natural object – perhaps a nitrogen iceberg fragment from a Pluto-like exoplanet or a comet with unusual outgassing properties – its existence was a stunning development. Nature itself had produced an object that perfectly matched the description of a classic, century-old UAP type. This discovery adds a significant layer of complexity to the cigar-shaped UAP mystery. It provides a potential natural explanation for at least some sightings, suggesting that interstellar objects of this shape may pass through our solar system more often than previously thought. At the same time, it also confirms that a highly elongated, cigar-like shape is a viable form for interstellar travel, whether the object is natural or artificial. The cigar remains an enigma, a shape that connects 19th-century wonder, 20th-century UAP reports, and 21st-century astronomical discovery.

The Modern Mainstay: Triangles and V-Shapes

Beginning in the 1980s, a new and distinct shape began to dominate UAP reports, eventually supplanting the classic saucer as the most frequently discussed and analyzed morphology in modern ufology. This was the era of the “black triangle.” These massive, silent, and often menacing objects have been the subject of thousands of sightings worldwide, including some of the largest and most well-documented mass-sighting events in history. Their appearance coincided with the development of stealth aircraft technology, leading to a persistent and unresolved debate about their origin: are they secret, next-generation military platforms, or something else entirely?

The physical description of these craft is remarkably consistent across thousands of reports. They are almost always described as perfectly triangular or delta-shaped, with a dark, non-reflective, matte black surface. Their size is frequently reported as enormous, with common estimates ranging from the length of a football field to several city blocks. One of their most striking features is their ability to block out the stars as they pass overhead, creating a moving patch of blackness against the night sky. They typically feature bright, steady lights at each of the three corners. These lights are often white or yellow, and many reports include a larger, different-colored light – often red or orange – at the center of the craft’s underbelly.

The flight characteristics of the black triangles are perhaps their most anomalous and defining aspect. The single most common descriptor is silence. Witnesses are consistently stunned by the complete lack of sound from such massive objects, even when they are observed hovering at extremely low altitudes, sometimes just a few hundred feet overhead. Their movement is often described as slow, methodical, and deliberate, as if they are engaged in surveillance or mapping. This placid movement is often paired with the reported ability to accelerate to incredible speeds in an instant, disappearing from sight in a matter of seconds.

The rise in triangle sightings from the 1980s onward led many researchers to speculate about a connection to classified military projects. The U.S. Air Force was known to be developing and testing triangular-shaped aircraft like the F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter and the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber during this period. It is plausible that some sightings, particularly those near military test sites like Area 51, were of these advanced, unacknowledged aircraft before they were publicly revealed. many aspects of the sightings do not align well with this explanation. The reported sizes are often far larger than any known aircraft, and the ability to hover silently for extended periods at low altitude is a capability that conventional stealth jets do not possess. This has led to further speculation about even more advanced, rumored platforms, such as the so-called TR-3B, a hypothetical anti-gravity craft.

Two major mass-sighting events cemented the black triangle as a global phenomenon. The first was the Belgian UFO Wave, which took place from November 1989 to April 1990. Over several months, thousands of Belgian citizens, including at least 30 separate groups of police officers, reported seeing large, silent, low-flying black triangles with bright lights at their corners. The wave peaked on the night of March 30-31, 1990. On that night, a triangular UAP was detected on multiple NATO radar installations. The Belgian Air Force scrambled two F-16 fighter jets to investigate.

The pilots made multiple attempts to intercept the object, which their onboard radar systems locked onto several times. The radar data showed the object performing maneuvers impossible for any known aircraft. In one instance, it was tracked descending from an altitude of 10,000 feet to just 500 feet in five seconds. In another, it accelerated from about 170 mph to over 1,100 mph in a matter of seconds. Despite achieving radar lock, the F-16 pilots never made a sustained visual confirmation of the craft. The Belgian military was remarkably transparent about the incident, holding a press conference where a high-ranking colonel acknowledged that the technology witnessed exceeded the limits of conventional aviation. While a famous photograph from the wave was later revealed to be a clever hoax, this admission did not detract from the hundreds of credible witness reports and the official radar data that remain unexplained.

Less than a decade later, an even larger event unfolded in the United States. On the evening of March 13, 1997, what became known as the “Phoenix Lights” occurred. Tens of thousands of people across the state of Arizona witnessed a series of strange lights and objects. The event consisted of two distinct phases. The first, occurring between 8:00 and 9:00 p.m., involved a massive, V-shaped or triangular craft with five to seven lights flying silently and slowly on a path from north of Phoenix, over the city, and southeast towards Tucson.

Witnesses described an object of almost unbelievable scale. Some said it was the size of several football fields; a retired airline pilot estimated it was as large as 25 airliners. A common observation was that the craft was a solid object that blotted out the stars as it passed overhead. The second event, occurring around 10:00 p.m., was a series of stationary lights seen hovering over the city. The official explanation from the U.S. Air Force was that the two events were unrelated. The 10:00 p.m. lights, they stated, were slow-falling, high-altitude flares dropped by A-10 aircraft during a training exercise at a nearby bombing range. The earlier, massive V-shaped craft, they claimed, was simply a formation of A-10 jets flying in an echelon pattern.

This explanation has been widely disputed by witnesses, most notably by the governor of Arizona at the time, Fife Symington. After initially mocking the incident at a press conference, Symington later confessed that he too had witnessed the massive craft. He described it as “enormous and otherworldly” and stated definitively that it was not flares or high-altitude jets. The Phoenix Lights and the Belgian UFO Wave represent the pinnacle of black triangle sightings – well-documented, multi-witness events involving objects that display characteristics far beyond our known technological capabilities, leaving a persistent and compelling mystery.

The Ubiquitous Orb: Spheres of Light and Metal

Of all the shapes reported in the vast catalog of UAP sightings, one is by far the most common and the most varied: the orb. From amorphous, glowing balls of light to solid, metallic spheres, these objects are the most frequently documented type of UAP, both in historical accounts and in modern military data. According to the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), reports classified as “Orb/Round/Sphere” or simply “Lights” constitute the overwhelming majority of cases where a shape is described, accounting for over 70% of the total.

This prevalence is partly due to the ambiguous nature of the shape. A distant, unresolved point of light in the night sky is often categorized as an “orb” by default, making it a catch-all for a wide range of potential misidentifications, from celestial bodies to conventional aircraft. a significant subset of these reports describes structured objects and anomalous behaviors that are not so easily dismissed. These sightings can be broadly divided into two sub-types: luminous orbs and metallic spheres.

Luminous orbs are the classic “strange lights in the sky.” They are often described as glowing balls of energy, appearing in a variety of colors, including white, red, orange, blue, and green. Their appearance can range from a sharp, star-like point of light to a larger, more diffuse and plasma-like globe. Their behavior is a key anomalous feature. They are frequently reported to move erratically, darting across the sky, making sudden stops, and hovering silently for long periods before accelerating away at high speed. In some cases, they are seen to merge together or split into multiple, smaller orbs, a behavior that defies conventional physics.

Metallic spheres, in contrast, are described as solid, structured craft. Reports often mention a silvery or metallic surface that reflects sunlight during the day. Recent years have seen a surge in military reports of these objects, often captured on advanced sensor systems. These metallic orbs have been observed operating individually or in large groups, sometimes described as “swarms,” often over sensitive military training ranges or naval assets.

The history of orb-like UAP sightings in a military context is long, with the first major wave of reports coming during World War II. Allied pilots flying over both the European and Pacific theaters began encountering what they nicknamed “Foo Fighters.” These were described as small, fast-moving, round balls of light – glowing red, orange, or white – that would appear suddenly and pace their aircraft. The pilots reported that these objects seemed to be under intelligent control, as they would mimic the evasive maneuvers of the fighter planes, flying in tight formation with them before suddenly vanishing. The Foo Fighters were never hostile and could not be outmaneuvered or shot down. At the time, pilots assumed they were advanced secret weapons developed by the enemy, but after the war, it was revealed that German and Japanese pilots had reported seeing the exact same phenomena. The Foo Fighters represent one of the earliest, most well-documented series of military encounters with UAP, establishing the orb as a persistent object of official interest.

That interest has intensified dramatically in the 21st century. The public release of videos from U.S. Navy fighter jets has shown encounters with objects that, while sometimes described with other names like “Gimbal,” often appear as bright, spherical hotspots on infrared sensors. More pointedly, a 2022 video captured by MQ-9 Reaper drones in a conflict zone in the Middle East clearly shows a small, silvery, metallic orb moving at a steady pace. Officials from AARO have stated that this object remains unidentified.

An even more startling incident was revealed during a congressional hearing. Lawmakers were shown footage, also from an MQ-9 Reaper drone operating off the coast of Yemen, of an engagement with an orb-like UAP. In the video, the drone targets the object and fires a Hellfire missile, an advanced anti-armor weapon. The footage shows the missile making a direct impact with the orb. Instead of being destroyed, the object appears to momentarily deflect or absorb the energy of the impact, perhaps shedding a few small pieces, before continuing on its trajectory, seemingly undamaged.

This incident, if depicted accurately, has significant implications. It suggests the object was not only a solid, physical craft but one made of a material or protected by a technology capable of withstanding a direct hit from a powerful military weapon. The orb occupies a unique space in the UAP taxonomy. It is at once the most common and easily misidentified shape, and also the subject of some of the most compelling and technologically challenging evidence ever presented to the public. While many orb sightings are undoubtedly prosaic, a core group of well-documented encounters points to a genuine and deeply puzzling phenomenon.

A Taxonomy of the Unidentified: Other Reported Morphologies

Beyond the dominant archetypes of discs, triangles, and orbs lies a veritable menagerie of other reported shapes. This diversity is one of the most challenging aspects of the UAP phenomenon, as it resists any simple, all-encompassing explanation. The sheer variety of forms suggests that we may not be dealing with a single phenomenon, but rather a collection of different ones, or perhaps a single phenomenon that can manifest in a multitude of ways. From the sleek and aerodynamic to the geometrically bizarre, these less common shapes are supported by some of the most credible and high-profile UAP cases on record.

The Tic-Tac

Perhaps the most famous UAP of the 21st century, the “Tic-Tac” is defined by a single, extraordinary series of events. The object, named for its resemblance to the popular breath mint, is described as a smooth, white, oblong or pill-shaped craft, approximately 40 feet in length. It is utterly featureless, with no wings, rotors, control surfaces, or any visible means of propulsion.

Its fame comes from the 2004 encounters involving the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group off the coast of Southern California. For two weeks, the advanced radar systems of the USS Princeton had been tracking anomalous aerial vehicles that would appear at 80,000 feet, drop to 20,000 feet in seconds, and hover. On November 14, two F/A-18F Super Hornet pilots, Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich, were diverted to intercept one of these objects.

They arrived to find a churning disturbance on the otherwise calm ocean surface, with the white, Tic-Tac-shaped object hovering erratically just above it, moving like a “ping-pong ball.” As Fravor began a spiral descent to get a closer look, the object ascended to meet him, mirroring his movements. It then accelerated at a speed Fravor described as beyond anything he had ever seen, crossing his nose and disappearing in an instant. Less than a minute later, the USS Princeton reacquired the object on its radar at the pilots’ original rendezvous point, 60 miles away. Later that day, another F/A-18 captured the now-famous infrared video of a Tic-Tac object performing similar instantaneous accelerations. The associated underwater disturbance, coupled with unconfirmed sonar reports of a fast-moving submerged object, strongly suggested a trans-medium capability. The Tic-Tac incident is a textbook case, as the object displayed all of the “Five Observables” of advanced UAP performance.

The Boomerang or Chevron

Closely related to the triangle is the boomerang or V-shape. These craft are described as having a more pronounced curved or chevron shape, rather than the straight edges of a classic delta. Like triangles, they are often reported as being large, silent, and possessing lights along their leading edges or at the tips of the “wings.” This shape is often conflated with triangles in witness reports. For instance, while many witnesses to the 1997 Phoenix Lights event described a massive triangle, others specifically reported a V-formation or a solid, boomerang-shaped craft. This overlap suggests they may be part of the same family of phenomena, with variations in shape or perspective accounting for the different descriptions.

Geometric Forms: Diamond, Rectangle, and the “Cube in a Sphere”

While less common, reports of simple geometric shapes persist in the UAP database. Diamond or rhombus-shaped objects are described as kite-like, sometimes seen rotating or spinning, and often having a central light or feature. Rectangular or box-shaped UAP are also occasionally reported, sometimes described as being large and having structural details like windows.

One of the most specific and bizarre geometric forms was reported by U.S. Navy pilots operating off the East Coast between 2014 and 2015. Multiple pilots from different squadrons reported encounters with objects described as a “dark gray or black cube inside of a clear sphere.” These objects, estimated to be between 5 and 15 feet in diameter, were capable of extraordinary performance, including remaining stationary in hurricane-force winds and then accelerating to supersonic speeds. In one particularly alarming incident, one of these objects flew directly between two F/A-18s that were flying in formation, coming within 50 feet of the lead aircraft and triggering a safety report. The sightings of this specific, seemingly paradoxical object became so frequent that they were included as a regular part of the pilots’ pre-flight safety briefs.

Organic and Amorphous Shapes: Jellyfish, Teardrop, and Shape-Shifters

Some of the most unusual UAP reports describe objects that appear less like manufactured craft and more like organic life forms or fluid entities. A classification system developed by one private research group includes a “Jellyfish” class, described as having a purple and black translucent dome or head with rigid appendages or “tentacles” hanging below. A related “Manta Ray” class is said to tumble through the sky as it moves. Another category, the “Hornet,” is described as a jellyfish-like object that appears to be carrying a distinct payload beneath it.

More conventional, though still uncommon, are reports of egg-shaped or teardrop-shaped UAP. These are described as elongated and rounded, often with a shiny or reflective surface. They are typically seen hovering or moving slowly through the sky.

Finally, there are reports of amorphous or shape-shifting UAP. These are objects that appear blurry, indistinct, or seem to fluidly change their form. One leaked military video shows an object that appears to switch between black and white as it flies. Such reports are the most difficult to categorize. They could represent a genuine and exotic characteristic of the phenomenon, suggesting a technology or reality that is not strictly physical in the way we understand it. Alternatively, they could be the result of sensor malfunctions, atmospheric distortions, or simple human misperception when viewing an object under challenging conditions. This ambiguity places them at the very edge of our ability to classify and comprehend.

Beyond Shape: The Five Observables of Flight

While the morphology of UAP provides a useful framework for categorization, it is often the behavior of these objects that is most anomalous. Across a wide spectrum of reported shapes – from discs and triangles to Tic-Tacs and orbs – a consistent set of extraordinary performance characteristics has been documented, particularly by highly trained military observers using advanced sensor technology. These capabilities, which appear to defy the known laws of physics and aerodynamics, have been codified by former military intelligence officials into a framework known as the “Five Observables.” This set of traits helps to distinguish genuinely anomalous phenomena from more conventional objects and serves as a key metric for assessing the technological capabilities on display.

1. Anti-Gravity Lift

The first observable is the ability of these objects to operate without any visible means of lift or propulsion. They are consistently reported as having no wings, fins, or other flight surfaces to generate aerodynamic lift. They also lack any discernible engines, propellers, rotors, or exhaust plumes that would indicate a known form of thrust. Yet, these objects are seen hovering motionless, often for extended periods, and maneuvering with precision in the atmosphere, apparently resisting the effects of Earth’s gravity through some unknown mechanism. The Tic-Tac object from the USS Nimitz encounter is a perfect example, described by pilots as a smooth, wingless capsule that could stop and hover over the ocean before accelerating away.

2. Sudden and Instantaneous Acceleration

UAP are frequently observed performing extreme maneuvers, including changing direction and accelerating at rates that would be instantly fatal to a human pilot. The g-forces generated by such movements would not only crush any biological occupant but would also likely exceed the structural integrity of any known man-made aircraft. During the Nimitz encounters, radar operators on the USS Princeton tracked a UAP as it accelerated from a stationary hover to a speed of over 3,600 mph, covering 60 miles in less than a minute. Other analyses of the event have estimated the accelerations involved to be in the hundreds or even thousands of g’s. This ability to overcome inertia instantaneously suggests a form of propulsion or physics that is fundamentally different from our own.

3. Hypersonic Velocities Without Signatures

When conventional aircraft travel at speeds exceeding the speed of sound (approximately 767 mph at sea level), they create a number of tell-tale signatures. The most obvious is a sonic boom, a powerful shockwave that can be heard on the ground. They also often leave vapor trails or contrails in their wake and generate immense heat from air friction, which is easily detectable on infrared sensors. UAP are often reported to travel at hypersonic speeds (more than five times the speed of sound) without producing any of these expected signatures. They move through the atmosphere silently, without sonic booms, and often show no significant thermal signature on infrared cameras, which is particularly puzzling. This implies an ability to manipulate the environment around the craft, perhaps by mitigating air friction and pressure in some way.

4. Low Observability or Cloaking

Despite being detected on some of the world’s most advanced radar and infrared systems, UAP are notoriously difficult to get a clear look at. This characteristic is referred to as low observability. Visually, witnesses often describe seeing a glow, a shimmer, or a haze around the object, making it difficult to discern the precise shape or surface details of the craft itself. On radar, their returns can be intermittent, nonsensical, or can even appear to jam the sensor systems. This suggests that the objects may possess some form of active cloaking or stealth technology that goes far beyond simply reducing their radar cross-section.

5. Trans-Medium Travel

Perhaps the most significant and technologically challenging of the five observables is the ability of some UAP to travel seamlessly between different physical environments, such as space, the atmosphere, and water. Our current understanding of physics and engineering requires vehicles to be designed specifically for the medium in which they operate; a spacecraft, an airplane, and a submarine are all fundamentally different machines. Yet, UAP have been observed moving between these domains without any apparent change in performance or design.

This capability has given rise to the related concept of Unidentified Submerged Objects, or USOs. The term USO has been officially incorporated into the broader UAP definition by the Department of Defense, acknowledging that the phenomenon is not limited to the sky. The 2004 Nimitz encounter included multiple indications of trans-medium activity. Pilots first noticed a large, churning disturbance in the ocean directly below the Tic-Tac, suggesting another object was present just beneath the surface. Unofficial reports from sonar operators in the carrier group later indicated that a submerged object was tracked moving at over 70 knots – more than twice the speed of a nuclear submarine.

More recently, in 2019, a video taken from the USS Omaha shows a spherical object flying over the ocean before stopping and slowly descending, appearing to enter the water without a splash. These incidents of trans-medium travel represent a technological capability so far beyond our own that it challenges our fundamental understanding of propulsion and material science. The Five Observables, taken together, paint a picture of a technology that is not just a few years ahead of ours, but potentially operates on entirely different physical principles.

Frameworks for Understanding: Classification Systems

As reports of unidentified aerial phenomena grew in number and complexity throughout the mid-20th century, researchers recognized the need for a more systematic way to organize and analyze the data. Ad-hoc descriptions of “flying saucers” or “strange lights” were insufficient for scientific inquiry. This led to the development of formal classification systems designed to bring order to the chaos of witness testimony. Two systems, created by two of the most influential figures in the history of the subject, have become the standard frameworks for categorizing UAP encounters. Though developed in collaboration, they approach the problem from fundamentally different perspectives.

The Hynek Classification System

The most famous and widely used classification system was developed by Dr. J. Allen Hynek. An astronomer by training, Hynek was initially a skeptic. He was hired by the U.S. Air Force in 1948 to serve as the scientific consultant for its official UFO investigations, beginning with Project Sign and continuing through Project Blue Book, which ended in 1969. His initial role was to identify conventional explanations for sightings, and he was effective at debunking the vast majority of cases as misidentifications of astronomical objects, weather balloons, or other prosaic phenomena.

over his two decades of work with the Air Force, Hynek’s opinion began to change. He was struck by the number of reports that came from credible, reliable witnesses – such as pilots, police officers, and engineers – and by the small but persistent percentage of cases that defied any easy explanation. After Project Blue Book was terminated, Hynek dedicated himself to the independent scientific study of the phenomenon, founding the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS) in 1973.

In his 1972 book, The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry, Hynek introduced a classification system that categorizes sightings based on the proximity and nature of the witness’s experience. It is an anthropocentric system, focused on the human observer’s relationship to the event.

The system is divided into two main groups: distant sightings and close encounters.

• Distant Sightings:
  • Nocturnal Lights (NL): The most common type of report, involving the observation of anomalous lights in the night sky. These can be single lights or multiple lights, often displaying unusual colors or movements.
  • Daylight Discs (DD): Sightings of UAP during the daytime, where the object’s shape – often described as disc-like, oval, or metallic – is discernible against the sky.
  • Radar/Visual (RV): Cases where a visual sighting is corroborated by a simultaneous detection on radar, providing an objective instrumental confirmation of the object’s presence.
• Close Encounters: This is the most famous part of Hynek’s system, immortalized in the title of the 1977 Steven Spielberg film.
  • Close Encounter of the First Kind (CE-I): A visual sighting of a UAP from a close distance, generally defined as within 500 feet. The object is seen clearly, but there is no physical interaction with the environment.
  • Close Encounter of the Second Kind (CE-II): A close encounter that leaves behind some form of physical evidence. This can include impressions or burn marks on the ground where an object landed, interference with electronic equipment like car engines or radios, or physiological effects on witnesses, such as burns or temporary paralysis.
  • Close Encounter of the Third Kind (CE-III): A close encounter in which “animate beings” or occupants are observed in or around the UAP.

Hynek’s system provided a simple, logical, and powerful tool that allowed researchers to sort and compare cases based on their intensity and the quality of the evidence.

The Vallee Classification System

Jacques Vallée, a computer scientist, astrophysicist, and early collaborator with Hynek, developed a different and more complex classification system. Vallée was critical of the simplistic nature of many UAP investigations and believed that a more detailed typology was needed to capture the full range of behaviors reported. His system, unlike Hynek’s, is not based on the witness’s proximity but on the morphology and actions of the phenomenon itself. It is a phenomenological system, focused on what the UAP is and what it does.

Vallée’s system is broken down into five main types, with several subtypes for each, allowing for a much more granular analysis of an event.

• Type I: Observation of an unusual object on or close to the ground. This category is similar to a CE-II but is defined by the object’s location and behavior, such as hovering over a body of water, landing and leaving physical traces, or appearing to scout a terrestrial vehicle.
• Type II: Observation of a vertical cylindrical object, often described as a “cloud-cigar.” This type focuses on a specific morphology and its associated phenomena, such as being stationary while releasing smaller, secondary objects, or moving erratically through the sky.
• Type III: Observation of a spherical, discoidal, or elliptical object engaged in complex aerial maneuvers. This type captures reports of UAP that demonstrate intelligent control, such as hovering for a period before continuing, altering their appearance while hovering, engaging in “dogfights” with other objects, or suddenly changing their trajectory.
• Type IV: Observation of an object in continuous flight. This category includes sightings of UAP moving along a steady path, sometimes in formation with other objects, flying in a zig-zag or wave-like trajectory, or being influenced by the presence of nearby conventional aircraft.
• Type V: Observation of an object that appears “not fully material” or solid. This is Vallée’s most unconventional category, designed to account for reports of objects that seem to be translucent, luminous phenomena rather than physical craft, or star-like objects that behave in anomalous ways.

The Hynek and Vallée systems offer two complementary ways of looking at the same data. Hynek’s framework is invaluable for assessing the impact of an event and the strength of the evidence, while Vallée’s provides a richer, more detailed picture of the phenomenon’s behavior. The following table highlights the core differences in their approaches.

The Search for Conventional Explanations

In any serious discussion of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, it is essential to acknowledge a fundamental truth: the vast majority of reported sightings, upon investigation, turn out to be perfectly conventional. The “U” in UAP stands for “unidentified,” but this is often a temporary status. For every case that remains a persistent mystery, there are hundreds that are resolved and re-categorized as Identified Flying Objects, or IFOs. Maintaining an objective perspective requires a thorough understanding of the common sources of misidentification that account for this high resolution rate.

Official government studies have consistently found that a high percentage of UAP reports can be explained. The U.S. Air Force’s Project Blue Book, which investigated over 12,000 sightings between 1952 and 1969, concluded that over 90% of cases were attributable to known astronomical, atmospheric, or artificial phenomena. More recently, the Pentagon’s AARO has reported that for cases where sufficient data is available for analysis, most are resolved as mundane objects. This high rate of identification does not invalidate the small percentage of cases that remain unexplained; rather, it helps to filter the “noise” of misidentification from the potential “signal” of genuinely anomalous events.

The sources of this noise are varied and often a product of challenging viewing conditions or the observer’s lack of specific knowledge.

Misidentification of Aircraft, Balloons, and Satellites

Many UAP reports are simply misidentified conventional aircraft. A commercial airliner seen from an unusual angle, at night, or with its landing lights on can appear strange and unfamiliar. Experimental military aircraft and drones are another common source of confusion. Balloons are one of the most frequent culprits. Large research balloons, weather balloons, and even festive Mylar balloons or sky lanterns can reflect sunlight in strange ways and drift on the wind in a manner that appears non-ballistic, leading to reports of silent, hovering, or erratically moving objects. AARO’s data shows that balloons are one of the most common explanations for resolved UAP cases. Satellites in orbit are another source. A phenomenon known as a “satellite flare” occurs when sunlight glints off a flat, reflective surface like a solar panel, creating a brief, brilliant flash of light that can appear to move rapidly across the sky.

Atmospheric and Astronomical Phenomena

The sky is full of natural phenomena that can trick the eye. The most common astronomical source of UAP reports is the planet Venus. When it is at its brightest, it can appear as an intensely luminous object that seems to hover and even move, an illusion caused by the observer’s own small, unconscious movements (autokinesis). Bright stars, meteors, and fireballs (bolides) are also frequently reported as UAP.

The Earth’s atmosphere can act like a giant lens, creating a host of optical illusions. Mirages, such as the Fata Morgana effect, can make objects on or below the horizon appear to be hovering in the air. Sundogs (parhelia) are bright spots of light that appear on either side of the sun, caused by ice crystals in the atmosphere. Lens flare in cameras can create artificial shapes and lights that are not present in reality. Unusual cloud formations, like lenticular clouds that resemble stacked saucers, or the “hole-punch clouds” offered as an explanation for the 2006 O’Hare sighting, can also be mistaken for structured craft.

Sensor Artifacts and Perceptual Illusions

Even with advanced technology, what you see is not always what is there. Modern sensor systems, including radar and infrared cameras, are complex instruments that can produce errors or artifacts. A glitch in the software, a reflection within the sensor’s optics, or an electronic malfunction can create an image of an object that doesn’t exist. The 2021 ODNI report on UAP specifically noted that some observations could be the result of sensor errors.

Human perception is also fallible. One of the most significant perceptual illusions relevant to UAP is the parallax effect. This is the apparent shift in an object’s position when viewed from different lines of sight. In the context of UAP videos taken from a moving platform like a jet, parallax can make a slow-moving or stationary distant object appear to be moving at incredible speeds. A detailed analysis of the Navy’s “GO FAST” video, which appeared to show an object skimming the water at high velocity, concluded that the object’s actual speed was likely only around 40 mph – consistent with the wind speed at that altitude – and that its apparent high speed was an illusion created by parallax.

The Plasma Hypothesis

One scientific theory that has been proposed to explain a subset of UAP reports, particularly luminous orbs and the WWII Foo Fighters, is the plasma hypothesis. In its simplest form, this theory suggests that some sightings could be a form of atmospheric plasma, such as ball lightning – a rare and poorly understood phenomenon where a glowing sphere of electrified gas can appear, move erratically, and then disappear. More complex and speculative versions of this theory propose that large, stable, self-organizing plasma entities could exist in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. Some researchers have suggested that these plasma forms could be attracted to electromagnetic fields and exhibit complex, life-like behaviors, potentially accounting for some of the more exotic UAP reports.

Together, these conventional explanations form a critical toolkit for UAP investigation. They successfully account for the vast majority of sightings and underscore the importance of rigorous data collection and analysis. The enduring mystery of the UAP phenomenon resides in the small fraction of cases that, even after all these prosaic possibilities have been exhausted, remain truly unidentified.

Summary

The landscape of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena is one of immense diversity and complexity. An exploration of the subject through the lens of morphology reveals a rich history of reported shapes, evolving from the iconic flying saucers and cigars of the post-war era to the massive black triangles and enigmatic orbs that characterize modern military encounters. This taxonomy is not static; it has expanded over time to include a wide array of less common but persistently reported forms, such as the wingless Tic-Tac, the paradoxical “cube in a sphere,” and even objects described as organic or amorphous. This sheer variety challenges any single, simple explanation, suggesting instead that UAP may be a composite of multiple, distinct phenomena.

Beyond their physical forms, these objects are often defined by their extraordinary flight characteristics. The “Five Observables” – anti-gravity lift, sudden acceleration, hypersonic speeds without signatures, low observability, and trans-medium travel – represent a set of physics-defying behaviors that have been consistently reported by credible, trained observers across many different UAP shapes. This suggests that the underlying technology or physical principles at play may be more significant than the specific morphology of the craft. The behavior, not just the appearance, is what often makes these phenomena truly anomalous.

In navigating this complex subject, it is essential to maintain a balanced and objective perspective. The vast majority of UAP reports, when subjected to rigorous investigation, are ultimately resolved as misidentifications of conventional aircraft, balloons, satellites, or natural atmospheric and astronomical phenomena. Perceptual illusions and sensor artifacts also play a significant role. This high rate of identification underscores the importance of skepticism and thorough analysis.

it is the small, persistent fraction of unresolved cases that constitutes the core of the UAP mystery. These are the incidents, often supported by multiple witnesses and high-quality sensor data, that defy all conventional explanations. They represent a genuine challenge, not only to our scientific understanding but also to our national security. The study of UAP shapes and types is, in the end, an exploration of the boundary between the known and the unknown. It is a complex puzzle where human perception, advanced technology, and potentially undiscovered phenomena intersect, leaving us with more questions than answers and ensuring that we will continue to watch the skies with a sense of wonder and uncertainty.

10 Best-Selling UFO and UAP Books

UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record

This investigative work presents case-driven reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena, focusing on military and aviation encounters, official records, and the difficulties of validating unusual sightings. It frames UAP as a topic with operational and safety implications, while also examining how institutional incentives shape what gets documented, dismissed, or left unresolved in public view.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Communion

This memoir-style narrative describes a series of alleged close encounters and the personal aftermath that follows, including memory gaps, fear, and attempts to interpret what happened. The book became a landmark in modern UFO literature by shifting attention toward the subjective experience of contact and the lasting psychological disruption that can accompany claims of abduction.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Passport to Magonia: From Folklore to Flying Saucers

This classic argues that UFO reports can be read alongside older traditions of folklore, religious visions, and accounts of strange visitations. Rather than treating unidentified flying objects as only a modern technology story, it compares motifs across centuries and cultures, suggesting continuity in the narratives people use to describe anomalous encounters.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Hunt for the Skinwalker: Science Confronts the Unexplained at a Remote Ranch in Utah

This book recounts an investigation of recurring reports tied to a specific location, combining witness interviews, instrumentation, and field protocols. It mixes UFO themes with broader anomaly claims – unusual lights, apparent surveillance, and events that resist repeatable measurement – while documenting the limits of organized inquiry in unpredictable conditions.

VIEW ON AMAZON

The Day After Roswell

Framed around claims connected to the Roswell narrative, this book presents a storyline about recovered materials, classified handling, and alleged downstream effects on advanced technology programs. It is written as a retrospective account that blends personal testimony, national-security framing, and long-running debates about secrecy, documentation, and how extraordinary claims persist without transparent verification.

VIEW ON AMAZON

The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry

Written by an astronomer associated with official UFO investigations, this book argues for treating UFO reports as data rather than tabloid spectacle. It discusses patterns in witness reports, classification of encounter types, and why a subset of cases remained unexplained after conventional screening. It remains a foundational text for readers interested in structured UFO investigations.

VIEW ON AMAZON

The Hynek UFO Report: The Authoritative Account of the Project Blue Book Cover-Up

This work focuses on how official investigations managed UFO case intake, filtering, and public messaging. It portrays a tension between internal curiosity and external pressure to reduce reputational risk, while highlighting cases that resisted straightforward explanations. For readers tracking UAP governance and institutional behavior, it offers a narrative about how “closed” cases can still leave unanswered questions.

VIEW ON AMAZON

In Plain Sight: An Investigation into UFOs and Impossible Science

This modern overview synthesizes well-known incidents, government acknowledgments, and evolving language from “UFO” to “UAP,” with emphasis on how public institutions communicate uncertainty. It also surveys recurring claims about performance characteristics, sensor data, and reporting pathways, while separating what is documented from what remains speculative in contemporary UAP discourse.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens

Built around case studies, this book presents narratives from people who report being taken and examined by non-human entities. It approaches the topic through interviews and clinical framing, emphasizing consistency across accounts, emotional impact, and the difficulty of interpreting memories that emerge through recall techniques. It is a central title in the alien abduction subset of UFO books.

VIEW ON AMAZON

Missing Time: A Documented Study of UFO Abductions

This book introduced many mainstream readers to the concept of “missing time” and the investigative methods used to reconstruct reported events. It compiles recurring elements – time loss, intrusive memories, and perceived medical procedures – while arguing that the pattern is too consistent to dismiss as isolated fantasy. It remains widely read within UFO research communities focused on abduction claims.

VIEW ON AMAZON