This article is part of an ongoing series created in collaboration with the UAP News Center, a leading website for the most up-to-date UAP news and information. Visit UAP News Center for the full collection of infographics.
Key Takeaways
- Whistleblower alleges unacknowledged program hiding UAP imagery.
- “Parent” USAP reportedly manages “child” SAPs to evade oversight.
- Immaculate Constellation report details 7 classes of UAP and multiple military encounters.
Unacknowledged Special Access Program
In October 2024, a significant controversy emerged within the defense and intelligence communities regarding a purported Unacknowledged Special Access Program (USAP) known as “Immaculate Constellation.” Allegations brought forward by a whistleblower, and subsequently reported by independent journalist Michael Shellenberger , claim that this program functions as a central repository for high-fidelity intelligence on Unidentified flying object (UFO), now officially termed Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). The whistleblower’s report, submitted to the United States Congress , asserts that the Executive Branch has utilized this program to withhold critical information regarding UAP and “Non-Human Intelligence” (NHI) from legislative oversight, potentially in violation of the National Defense Authorization Act .
The core of the allegation is that Immaculate Constellation operates outside the standard oversight mechanisms established for the Department of Defense (DoD). While the DoD, through a spokesperson, has officially denied the existence of any program by that name, the detailed report provided to Congress outlines a complex bureaucratic structure designed to capture, analyze, and quarantine UAP data. This article examines the structural, operational, and observational details contained within the whistleblower’s report, referred to as the “Immaculate Constellation” report, analyzing the alleged program’s mission, the specific intelligence assets employed, and the taxonomy of anomalous phenomena it reportedly monitors.
The Architecture of Secrecy: Unacknowledged Special Access Programs
The report describes Immaculate Constellation as a “Parent” USAP. In the classification hierarchy of the United States government, a Special Access Program (SAP) is a security protocol that provides highly restricted access to sensitive information. An “Unacknowledged” SAP (USAP) represents an even deeper layer of secrecy, where the existence of the program itself is not acknowledged to those without a specific “need to know,” often including members of Congress who would typically have oversight privileges.
The Parent-Child Structure
According to the whistleblower’s documentation, Immaculate Constellation was established in 2017, following the public revelation of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), which was previously directed by Luis Elizondo . The program is described as a “nexus” or a central consolidation point. It ostensibly sits at the top of a hierarchy, managing various “child” SAPs. These child programs are responsible for specific aspects of UAP research, such as the recovery of materials or the study of specific sensor data.
The primary function of this “Parent” status is compartmentalization. By segregating the different facets of UAP investigation into distinct, unconnected child programs, the program managers can prevent any single individual or external oversight body from seeing the full picture. The report alleges that Immaculate Constellation serves to enforce this compartmentalization by detecting UAP incidents across the Military Intelligence Enterprise and “quarantining” the data. This effectively removes the evidence from standard reporting channels before it can be circulated to wider intelligence bodies or the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO).
Security and Counter-Intelligence Mechanisms
The report outlines sophisticated internal information security controls employed by Immaculate Constellation. These controls are designed to identify when military sensors – whether “tasked” (specifically assigned to look for UAP) or “untasked” (routine surveillance assets) – capture anomalous data. Once a detection occurs, the program allegedly possesses the authority and capability to transfer that data into its secure archives, leaving the original operational units without a record of the event. This mechanism is cited as a primary reason why many cleared military personnel remain unaware of the frequency of UAP encounters; the evidence is removed from their systems before it can be analyzed at the unit level.
Mission Objectives and Intelligence Collection
The stated mission of Immaculate Constellation, as detailed in the report, is the collection of imagery intelligence (IMINT) on UAP and what the document refers to as “Reproduction Vehicles” (ARV/RV). This distinction suggests that the program monitors not only objects of unknown origin but also platforms that may represent human attempts to reverse-engineer or replicate observed anomalous technologies.
The Intelligence Portfolio
The program reportedly aggregates intelligence from a wide array of sources, creating a multi-domain picture of UAP activity. The evidence categories listed in the report include:
- Imagery Intelligence (IMINT): This is the core of the collection effort. It includes data from Infrared (IR), Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR), Full Motion Video (FMV), thermal sensors, and high-resolution still photography. The report emphasizes that the sensors used are often capable of detecting wavelengths outside the human visual spectrum, revealing characteristics of UAP that would otherwise remain invisible.
- Measurement and Signatures Intelligence (MASINT): This involves the detection of specific signatures associated with UAP, such as electromagnetic emissions, radioactive traces, or unique atmospheric disturbances. The report notes that UAP often display “subtle atmospheric effects” that can be exploited for tracking purposes.
- Signals Intelligence (SIGINT): The program reportedly collects data on the communications and electronic emissions of foreign nations. This SIGINT reveals that peer and near-peer adversaries are also tracking UAP and are deeply concerned about the presence of these objects near their own sensitive military facilities.
- Human Intelligence (HUMINT): The database includes over 400 reports from military aviators, ground personnel, and intelligence officers who have witnessed UAP firsthand. These reports often provide the narrative context for the sensor data, describing the behavior and flight characteristics of the objects.
Global Surveillance and Strategic Awareness
The collection platforms utilized by Immaculate Constellation are described as a blend of assets operating in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), the upper atmosphere, and maritime environments. The program monitors these domains globally, with a specific focus on “anomalous aerospace platforms” that may be of foreign origin. The report suggests that the program maintains a degree of “strategic awareness,” knowing the preferred operating areas and signatures of specific UAP types. This allows the program to predict, to some extent, where and when encounters might occur, particularly in relation to sensitive US and foreign military assets.
Detailed Incident Reports and Case Files
The whistleblower’s report provides specific summaries of UAP encounters that are allegedly archived within the Immaculate Constellation database. These accounts are derived from the IMINT and HUMINT data available to the program.
CENTCOM: The Cuboid Formation
One of the most distinct incidents occurred within the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command (CENTCOM). The evidence consists of daytime Full Motion Video (FMV) and FLIR footage. The imagery shows a formation of approximately 12 metallic orbs. These objects were observed skimming the surface of the ocean at high speeds.
The formation characteristics are particularly notable. The orbs were arranged in a tight “cuboid” structure. Specifically, they were grouped into three vertical-square formations of four orbs each, creating a three-pronged configuration that, from a distance, appeared as a single cube. In the thermal imagery (FLIR), the orbs registered as “white-hot” against the “black-cold” ocean, indicating a significant temperature differential. Each sphere generated a faint atmospheric distortion and a “heat-shimmer” contrail.
The behavior of the objects defied conventional aerodynamics. After maintaining the cube formation for a period, the orbs rapidly broke apart, separating into pairs. They then accelerated and ascended, moving in multiple directions. The sensor platform lost track of the main group but managed to maintain a lock on a single pair that continued on the original trajectory. The estimated size of each orb was between 3 to 6 meters in diameter.
INDOPACOM: The Reproduction Vehicle and Intelligence Vessels
In the Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) region, the report details an incident involving US intelligence vessels engaged in SIGINT and MASINT collection. The footage, captured at night using infrared sensors, shows a large equilateral-triangle UAP appearing directly over the ships.
The object is described as having three bright points of light at each bottom corner. As it hovered, it slowly rotated on its horizontal axis, revealing a “horizontal bar of sweeping lights” on its underside. The intelligence analysis included in the report classifies this object specifically as a “Reproduction Vehicle” (RV). The analysis concludes that the foreign vessels present in the area were likely aware of the RV’s schedule and location, having pre-positioned their assets to collect data on it. The object hovered between 500 and 1000 meters above the ocean before vanishing.
NORTHCOM: The Jellyfish and “Range Foulers”
The report describes a “Jellyfish” or “floating brain” UAP that was recorded crossing the southern border of the United States. This object, captured on FLIR, appeared “mottled” with irregular hot and cold thermal emissions. It possessed hanging appendages and moved with an unnatural “rigidity,” flying against the wind without any visible means of propulsion. The report notes that this specific class of UAP has also been observed near DoD facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan, suggesting a global presence of this specific morphology.
Another incident in the NORTHCOM sector involved a “Range Fouler” – a term used for objects that interrupt military training exercises. FLIR and radar data tracked a supersonic UAP that conducted a head-on intercept of a US Navy fighter off the Eastern Seaboard. The object emerged from a cloud bank at high speed, passing rapidly over the left side of the pilot’s cockpit. Radar data correlated with the visual sighting, providing hard telemetry on the object’s speed and heading.
SOUTHCOM: The Oceanic Tic-Tac
In the Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) area, space-based assets detected a “Tic-Tac” shaped UAP. This object, similar to the famous 2004 Nimitz encounter, was observed transiting the Atlantic Ocean near local cloud cover. Correlated electromagnetic signatures were collected by MASINT sensors, confirming the physical presence of the object. The report notes that while a nearby vessel did not visibly react, the proximity of the UAP to the ship’s trajectory suggested potential foreknowledge of the event by intelligence actors.
Morphology of Anomalous Phenomena
A significant portion of the Immaculate Constellation report is dedicated to the classification of UAP shapes. The program appears to have developed a taxonomy based on the visual and sensor data collected over decades. The following tables utilize the data provided in the report to detail the characteristics of the six primary UAP morphologies identified.
Sphere/Orb
The sphere is the most commonly reported shape in the dataset. These objects demonstrate high maneuverability and are often seen in formations.
| Observable | Details |
|---|---|
| Size | Sizes range from small objects to those several meters in diameter. |
| Speed | Capable of stationary hovering to rapid acceleration; speeds surpassing conventional aircraft have been noted. |
| Signatures | Often lack conventional signatures such as heat trails; electromagnetic effects on military electronics reported. |
| Colors | Varied, with grey/metallic, greyish-blue, white/white-yellow, and red/orange-red being prevalent. |
| Surface Details | Ranges from completely smooth and reflective to having visible protuberances, appendages, concavities, and openings. |
| Behaviors | High maneuverability, including abrupt direction changes and the ability to hover. Often observed to fly in complex geometrical formations and to operate in tandem. |
| Atmospheric Phenomena | Occasional disturbances in cloud formations and ‘heatwave’ contrails have been reported. |
| Biological Effects | Close observers reported feelings of unease, and of electronic device malfunctions. |
Disc/Saucer
The classic “flying saucer” shape remains a staple of UAP reports. These objects are often larger than spheres and exhibit distinct “silent operation” capabilities.
| Observable | Details |
|---|---|
| Size | Generally, range from a few meters to over 20 meters in diameter. |
| Speed | Exhibits capabilities for both hovering and high-speed flight, often making sudden sprints. |
| Signatures | Radar detection varies, visual sightings more common. Some reports include a humming sound. |
| Colors | Metallic silver or gray is common, though some have been reported as emitting light or changing color. |
| Surface Details | Variations include smooth, featureless surfaces to those with visible domes or segmented panels. |
| Behaviors | Sudden vertical ascents, hovering, and silent operation. Some reports indicate the ability to become invisible or blend into the sky. |
| Unique Emissions | Instances of electromagnetic interference in nearby devices and vehicles. |
| Atmospheric Phenomena | Visual disturbances, such as shimmering air or sudden fog formation. |
Oval/Tic-Tac
This category includes the cylindrical objects made famous by recent Navy disclosures. They are characterized by a lack of control surfaces and high-speed travel without sonic booms.
| Observable | Details |
|---|---|
| Size | Lengths typically from 6 to 40 meters, maintaining proportional width and height. |
| Speed | High-speed travel and instant acceleration have been frequently reported, with no sonic boom. |
| Signatures | Visual identification often notes a lack of contrail. |
| Colors | White or silver. |
| Surface Details | Uniformly smooth surface, with occasional reports of protuberances that could be sensors, propulsion elements, weapons, or unknown technology. |
| Behaviors | Observed ability to hover and then accelerate suddenly. Some encounters describe them maintaining stable positions despite high winds. |
Triangular
Triangular UAPs are rarer but often larger than other types. They are frequently associated with focused beams of light and psychological effects on observers.
| Observable | Details |
|---|---|
| Size | Medium to large sized, ranging from F-16 to football-field size. |
| Speed | Capable of slow, precise movement as well as rapid acceleration to speeds beyond conventional aircraft. |
| Signatures | Often reported to emit a soft, humming sound; may affect electronic devices within a certain proximity. |
| Colors | Black or dark gray, sometimes with white lights at the corners and a central red light; reports of “twinkling” stars across surface. |
| Surface Details | Some have been described with visible surface textures, like panels or ridges, and occasionally stabilizers. |
| Behaviors | Hovering is common, as is silent flight. The ability to suddenly vanish or accelerate rapidly is frequently reported. |
| Unique Emissions | Triangular UAPs often emit focused beams of light. Toroidal light patterns are sometimes observed to emanate from a central point, leading to rapid acceleration or disappearance. |
| Biological Effects | Long-term psychological effects, such as anxiety or insomnia, have been noted, alongside the feeling of ‘being watched or shared awareness with the triangle UAP. |
Boomerang/Arrowhead
These shapes are distinct from triangles due to their curvature or specific aspect ratios. They are often described as blending in with the night sky.
| Observable | Details |
|---|---|
| Size | Wingspans can exceed 30 meters, especially for boomerang-shaped UAPs. Arrowheads typically range from F-16 size to slightly larger. |
| Speed | Exhibits both gliding at low speeds and the capacity for high-speed flight. |
| Signatures | Visual sightings often note a slow, silent flight profile. |
| Colors | Typically dark, blending with the night sky, though some reports include glowing edges or tips. |
| Surface Details | Smooth surfaces with a notable aerodynamic design; the arrowhead types show more angular features. |
| Behaviors | Known for silent operation and the ability to execute tight turns. |
| Unique Emissions | Seen to emit a spherical ‘ball’ of light from the centerline, which partially envelops the UAP during maneuvers, causing electromagnetic interference with local technologies. |
Irregular/Organic
This category includes objects that defy geometric description, such as the “Jellyfish” or shape-shifting entities. They are among the rarest and most baffling observations.
| Observable | Details |
|---|---|
| Size | Highly variable, from small, compact forms to larger, more sprawling structures. |
| Speed/Signatures | Movements range from slow drifting to rapid acceleration, often unpredictable. Some reports include unusual sounds or the absence of expected aerodynamic noise; electromagnetic effects are common. |
| Colors | Often described with bioluminescent qualities or shifting colors, particularly for “floating-brain” or jellyfish types. |
| Surface Details | Descriptions vary widely, from smooth, fluid-like surfaces to complex, articulated structures. |
| Behaviors | Demonstrates a wide range of behaviors, from controlled maneuvering to erratic patterns of movement. Shape-shifting abilities have been reported. |
| Biological Effects | Observations include physical sensations of warmth or cold, unexplained smells (e.g., ozone), and psychological distress. |
| Unique Emissions | The floating-brain/jellyfish UAPs occasionally exhibit ‘patterned’ luminescence or fluctuating lights/colors (typically only visible in the higher-end of the electromagnetic spectrum). |
| Atmospheric Phenomena | Sudden temperature drops, and the appearance of clouds have been reported. |
Human Intelligence and Physiological Effects
Beyond the mechanical data provided by sensors, the Immaculate Constellation report relies heavily on Human Intelligence (HUMINT). These are the first-hand accounts of pilots and ground crew who have interacted with UAP. The report highlights that these interactions are not always passive; they often produce tangible physiological and psychological effects on the observers.
The Carrier Strike Group Incident
One notable HUMINT report details a close encounter experienced by flight deck personnel on a US Aircraft Carrier (CVN) in the Pacific. Crew members observed a small, orange-red sphere maneuvering at high altitude before descending rapidly to hover just 100-200 yards above the flight deck. The object matched the speed of the ship.
The witnesses reported a “time distortion” effect, feeling as though their perception of time had altered during the event. The sphere itself was described as having a dynamic surface, “roiling like the surface of the sun,” yet paradoxically, the intense light it emitted did not illuminate the ship’s deck or the surrounding ocean. When the object eventually departed, shooting upwards at high speed, the personnel reported a sensation of “snapping out of a trance” followed by a significant sense of unease.
The F-22 Intercept
In another report, an F-22 pilot operating in the Eastern Air Defense Sector attempted to intercept a formation of metallic orbs. The pilot described the objects as slightly smaller than a sedan. Upon approach, the UAPs turned aggressive. A smaller formation of orbs accelerated towards the fighter jet. The pilot was unable to achieve a radar lock. The UAPs then “boxed in” the F-22, with one orb maintaining a rigid position just meters from the cockpit, perfectly matching the jet’s evasive maneuvers. The pilot was forced to exit the mission area under the “escort” of these objects.
Historical and Bureaucratic Context
The whistleblower report places Immaculate Constellation within a long lineage of government secrecy. It references a 1978 National Security Agency (NSA) report which confirmed that the US intelligence community was tasked with collecting data on foreign research into “parapsychology” and the biological effects of UAP. This historical document serves as evidence that the interest in the intersection of UAP and human biology is not new but has been a subject of intelligence collection for decades.
The report also addresses the current bureaucratic friction between the alleged program and the public-facing All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). It claims that the records of AARO contain discrepancies and that DoD leadership has engaged in a pattern of “trivialization and obfuscation” when briefing Congress. The existence of Immaculate Constellation, the report argues, directly contradicts the DoD’s assertions that no such reverse-engineering or retrieval programs exist. The whistleblower characterizes this withholding of information as a “criminal conspiracy” that prevents the legislative branch from assessing the true national security risks posed by UAP and Non-Human Intelligence.
Summary
The allegations surrounding the Immaculate Constellation program represent a significant escalation in the ongoing debate over UAP transparency. If the details provided in the whistleblower’s report are accurate, the United States Executive Branch has maintained a highly sophisticated, compartmentalized infrastructure for decades, designed to study anomalous technologies while actively shielding this information from Congress and the public. The report details a vast array of evidence, from high-fidelity sensor data of “cuboid” and “tic-tac” objects to harrowing accounts of military pilots being intercepted by superior aerial platforms. It categorizes these phenomena into distinct morphologies with specific performance characteristics, suggesting a deep level of scientific understanding has already been achieved in secret. As of today, the Department of Defense denies the existence of Immaculate Constellation, creating a stark standoff between official government positions and the sworn testimony of whistleblowers. The resolution of this conflict will likely depend on the willingness of Congress to exercise its oversight powers and demand access to the “parent” and “child” programs alleged to hold the secrets of the immaculate constellation.
Appendix: Top 10 Questions Answered in This Article
What is the Immaculate Constellation program?
It is an alleged Unacknowledged Special Access Program (USAP) established to collect and consolidate imagery intelligence (IMINT) on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). The program reportedly serves as a central “parent” entity that manages various “child” SAPs to maintain secrecy and compartmentalization.
What types of UAP shapes are described in the program’s database?
The program categorizes UAP into several distinct shapes, including spheres/orbs, discs/saucers, ovals/tic-tacs, triangles, boomerangs/arrowheads, and irregular/organic forms like “jellyfish.” Each shape is associated with specific size ranges, behaviors, and signature characteristics.
What is the “Parent” and “Child” SAP structure?
This structure refers to a security hierarchy where a central “Parent” program (Immaculate Constellation) oversees multiple smaller “Child” programs. This ensures that information is compartmentalized, so individuals working in one child program do not know the full scope of the parent program’s activities.
How does the program reportedly handle UAP evidence?
The program allegedly detects UAP incidents using military sensors and then “quarantines” the data, transferring it to secure archives. This process removes the evidence from the standard military reporting channels, preventing it from being seen by wider intelligence personnel or Congress.
What is the difference between tasked and untasked collection assets?
Tasked assets are military sensors specifically assigned to look for UAP, while untasked assets are routine surveillance platforms that capture UAP data incidentally during other missions. Immaculate Constellation reportedly utilizes data from both types of sources.
What evidence exists regarding the “Jellyfish” UAP?
The report describes FLIR footage of a “Jellyfish” or “floating brain” UAP crossing the US-Mexico border. The object appeared mottled with hot and cold sections, had hanging appendages, and moved rigidly against the wind without visible propulsion.
What happened during the CENTCOM “Cuboid” incident?
A formation of approximately 12 metallic orbs was recorded flying in a tight structure that resembled a cube from a distance. The orbs skimmed the ocean surface, creating heat shimmers, before breaking formation and accelerating away in pairs.
Does the report mention biological effects on humans?
Yes, the report includes Human Intelligence (HUMINT) detailing physiological and psychological effects on observers. These include time distortion, headaches, eyestrain, and a significant sense of unease or dread after close encounters.
What is a “Reproduction Vehicle” (ARV/RV)?
The term refers to aerospace platforms that are believed to be human-made attempts to replicate or reverse-engineer observed UAP technologies. The program reportedly tracks these vehicles to distinguish them from genuine anomalous phenomena.
Why is the program considered controversial?
The controversy stems from allegations that the Executive Branch has operated this program without Congressional oversight, withholding critical national security information. The whistleblower claims this constitutes a criminal conspiracy to prevent the legislative branch from exercising its lawful powers.
Appendix: Top 10 Frequently Searched Questions Answered in This Article
Is Immaculate Constellation a real government program?
A whistleblower alleges it is a real Unacknowledged Special Access Program, but the Department of Defense has officially denied its existence. The program is currently the subject of Congressional inquiry following the whistleblower’s report.
What did the whistleblower say about UAP secrecy?
The whistleblower claimed that the Executive Branch conspires to keep Congress ignorant of UAP discoveries. They asserted that intelligence is quarantined and managed by a secret network of SAPs to avoid oversight.
What are the most common UFO shapes reported by the military?
According to the report, the most common shapes are spheres or orbs, followed by discs and saucers. Less frequent but notable shapes include triangles, tic-tacs, and irregular forms like the “jellyfish.”
Has the US government recovered alien technology?
The report discusses “Reproduction Vehicles” (ARVs), implying that the US or foreign nations may be attempting to replicate UAP technology. It also mentions “child” SAPs that are linked to the study of Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) and their technologies.
What is the “Tic-Tac” UFO mentioned in the report?
The report describes “Tic-Tac” objects as oval or cylindrical UAPs that lack control surfaces and contrails. They are noted for their ability to hover and accelerate instantly to high speeds without producing a sonic boom.
Are other countries tracking UAP?
Yes, the report states that Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) confirms foreign nations are aware of UAP. These countries treat UAP as national security threats, especially when observed near their own nuclear and military facilities.
What psychological effects do UFOs have on pilots?
Pilots and crew members have reported “time distortion,” feeling like they are in a trance, and experiencing intense unease. Some ground personnel reported physical symptoms like headaches and eyestrain after observing UAP.
What is the connection between AATIP and Immaculate Constellation?
Immaculate Constellation was reportedly established in 2017 following the public disclosure of AATIP. It was created to consolidate UAP intelligence and ensure that subsequent data was protected from similar public leaks.
How does the military detect UAP?
The military uses a combination of Infrared (IR), Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR), radar, and MASINT sensors. These tools can detect heat signatures, electromagnetic emissions, and atmospheric disturbances that are invisible to the naked eye.
What happened to the F-22 that intercepted a UFO?
An F-22 pilot attempting to intercept metallic orbs was “boxed in” by the objects. One orb maintained a rigid position near the cockpit, matching the jet’s movements perfectly, forcing the pilot to leave the mission area.
KEYWORDS: Immaculate Constellation, Unacknowledged Special Access Program, USAP, UAP whistleblower, Michael Shellenberger, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, Reproduction Vehicle, ARV, imagery intelligence, IMINT, MASINT, HUMINT, SIGINT, AARO, Department of Defense, alien technology, Pentagon UFO program, Congressional oversight, UAP shapes, metallic orbs, jellyfish UAP, Tic-Tac UAP, biological effects of UAP, National Defense Authorization Act, Luis Elizondo.
