This article is part of an ongoing series created in collaboration with the UAP News Center, a leading website for the most up-to-date UAP news and information. Visit UAP News Center for the full collection of infographics.
Key Takeaways
- Media shifted from ridicule to serious investigation.
- Official data replaced tabloid speculation.
- Congressional action validated public interest.
The Tabloid Era and Institutional Skepticism of the 1990s
The cultural landscape regarding Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) during the 1990s was defined by a distinct dichotomy between popular entertainment and serious discourse. This decade, often remembered for its pre-digital reliance on televised news and print media, treated the subject of non-human intelligence (NHI) primarily as a source of amusement or a fringe belief system. The infographic illustrates this period as the “Tabloid Era,” characterized by low public belief in the scientific validity of the phenomenon and serious media coverage that barely registered on the scale.
During this period, the “Giggle Factor” was a powerful social mechanism. This term refers to the reflexive ridicule that accompanied any mention of UFOs in polite society or professional environments. News anchors would typically play the “X-Files” theme music when introducing a segment on a sighting, signalling to the audience that the following content was for entertainment purposes rather than information. This framing created a barrier that prevented academic institutions and government bodies from engaging with the subject openly. To discuss UFOs was to risk professional suicide, particularly for pilots, scientists, and military personnel who relied on security clearances and reputations for mental stability.
One of the most defining moments of this era was the broadcast of the “Alien Autopsy” footage in 1995. This television special, which purported to show the medical examination of an extraterrestrial entity recovered from Roswell, achieved massive ratings but was later revealed to be a fabrication. The exposure of such hoaxes reinforced the skeptical narrative. It allowed debunkers and skeptics to point to the most visible examples of the phenomenon as evidence of universal fraudulence. Consequently, the serious study of the subject was relegated to the back pages of tabloids, sitting alongside stories of Elvis sightings and two-headed livestock.
Despite the prevailing ridicule, the 1990s witnessed one of the most significant mass sighting events in history: the Phoenix Lights. On March 13, 1997, thousands of residents in Arizona, including the state’s governor at the time, Fife Symington, witnessed massive lights moving silently over the city. The media response to this event perfectly encapsulated the 1990s paradigm. While local news covered the event with some confusion and awe, the national response was dismissive. In a now-infamous press conference, Governor Symington had an aide dress in an alien costume to mock the reporters asking about the event. Years later, Symington would admit that he too saw the craft and believed it was of other-worldly origin, but at the time, the political necessity of maintaining credibility forced him to participate in the ridicule.
The public perception of NHI in the 1990s was heavily influenced by Hollywood. Movies like Independence Day and Men in Black cemented the idea of aliens as fictional antagonists or comic relief. While these films were culturally significant, they contributed to the “unreality” of the subject. If aliens were everywhere in the movies, they could not possibly be real. This saturation of fiction acted as a camouflage for any genuine anomalies that might have been occurring. The US Air Force continued to rely on the legacy of Project Blue Book, which had closed in 1969 with the conclusion that UFOs posed no threat to national security and were not of scientific interest. This official stance provided the cover for mainstream media to ignore the topic.
The absence of a centralized platform for reporting sightings meant that data remained fragmented. A witness in Ohio had no way of knowing that a similar object was seen in Belgium. The isolation of witnesses contributed to the silence. Without the validation of a community or the ability to share evidence instantly, most people chose to remain quiet rather than face the inevitable mockery. The 1990s represented the nadir of serious engagement, a time when the gap between the observer’s experience and the society’s acceptance was at its widest.
The Transitional Phase of the 2000s
As the world moved into the new millennium, the rigid structures of information control began to erode. The 2000s marked a transitional phase where the internet began to democratize data, allowing for the formation of independent research communities that bypassed traditional media gatekeepers. The infographic identifies this era as one of “Internet Forums / Independent Research,” seeing a moderate rise in public belief and a slight uptick in serious coverage, though the topic remained largely on the fringe.
The rise of broadband internet allowed for the rapid sharing of videos and photographs. While the quality of this evidence was often poor – grainy footage from early digital cameras or flip phones – the volume of data began to create a pattern that was difficult to ignore. Online forums such as Above Top Secret and various dedicated message boards became repositories for sighting reports that would have previously been lost to history. These platforms allowed witnesses to compare notes, identify trends, and provide emotional support to one another in an environment that, while often chaotic, was free from the immediate ridicule of the mainstream press.
Despite the growing online interest, the mainstream media remained hesitant. However, cracks in the wall of silence began to appear with high-profile incidents that involved credible witnesses and radar data. The 2006 O’Hare International Airport sighting was a pivotal moment. Dozens of airport employees, including pilots and supervisors, witnessed a metallic disc hovering over a gate before shooting upward through the clouds, leaving a distinct hole in the cloud cover. The Federal Aviation Administration initially dismissed the event as a weather phenomenon, but the audio tapes of the tower communications, released later, revealed the genuine concern and confusion of the air traffic controllers. The Chicago Tribune covered the story seriously, marking a rare departure from the “X-Files” tone of the previous decade.
Another significant event occurred in 2008 in Stephenville, Texas. Dozens of residents, including a local constable and a pilot, reported seeing a massive object moving at high speeds and being pursued by fighter jets. The Air Force initially denied having any aircraft in the area but was forced to retract that statement when radar data obtained by researchers proved the presence of F-16s. This incident highlighted the growing capability of civilian researchers to use Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and radar data analysis to challenge official narratives. It demonstrated that the monopoly on truth previously held by the government and major news networks was slipping.
The 2000s also saw the quiet occurrence of the Nimitz encounter in 2004, although the details would not become public knowledge until the following decade. During training exercises off the coast of California, the US Navy Carrier Strike Group 11 encountered anomalous aerial vehicles that defied the known laws of physics. These objects, later dubbed “Tic Tacs” due to their shape, were tracked on advanced radar systems and engaged visually by fighter pilots. At the time, this event remained classified and within the internal channels of the military, but it represented the accumulation of high-quality data that would eventually force the paradigm shift.
Television documentaries during this period began to shift slightly in tone. While sensationalism was still the norm, channels like the History Channel and Discovery Channel began producing content that focused more on the “nuts and bolts” aspects of sightings rather than just the folklore. Shows such as UFO Hunters attempted to apply forensic methods to cases, and while often dramatized, they introduced the general public to the concepts of trace evidence, radar confirmation, and pilot testimony. This helped to prime the public consciousness for a more scientific approach to the phenomenon.
Culturally, the 2000s were a time of “Occasional Curiosity.” The stigma was still present, but it was less aggressive than in the 1990s. The internet had created a “long tail” of interest where niche topics could thrive. People could educate themselves on the history of the phenomenon without having to visit a specialized bookstore or subscribe to a newsletter. The centralization of information on platforms like Wikipedia allowed for a baseline of knowledge to be established, separating well-documented cases from obvious hoaxes. This filtering process was essential for the credibility that would be required in the coming years.
The Breaking of the Dam in the 2010s
The decade of the 2010s began with the same status quo that had defined the previous twenty years, but it ended with a fundamental alteration of reality. The infographic characterizes this period and the subsequent years as the era of “Official Acknowledgement,” “Whistleblowers,” and “Investigative Journalism.” The turning point can be pinpointed with precision to December 2017, but the pressure had been building for years prior.
The catalyst for this shift was the revelation of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). This secret program within the Pentagon, directed by Luis Elizondo, had been studying UAP encounters involving military assets. The existence of this program directly contradicted decades of government statements asserting that no official interest in UFOs existed. The exposure of AATIP was orchestrated through a strategic partnership between Elizondo, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Christopher Mellon, and journalists.
On December 16, 2017, The New York Times published a front-page article titled “Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program.” Written by Helene Cooper, Ralph Blumenthal, and Leslie Kean, this article is widely considered the most important piece of journalism on the subject in history. It did not treat the subject as a joke. It did not use “X-Files” references. It presented the facts: the government had a program, the program studied objects that outmaneuvered US military aircraft, and there was video evidence.
Accompanying the article were three videos released by the Department of Defense: “FLIR1,” “GIMBAL,” and “GOFAST.” These videos, captured by gun camera pods on F/A-18 Super Hornets, showed objects moving in ways that aeronautical experts could not explain. The “GIMBAL” video, in particular, showed an object rotating mid-flight against the wind without losing momentum, a maneuver that suggests propulsion technology far beyond current human capabilities. The visual confirmation, combined with the prestige of The New York Times, shattered the “Giggle Factor” almost overnight.
Following the 2017 revelation, the media landscape underwent a rapid transformation. Network news anchors who would have previously mocked the topic were now interviewing Navy pilots like Ryan Graves and David Fravor. These pilots were credible, articulate, and trained observers. They described seeing these objects daily for extended periods. Their testimony shifted the narrative from “crazy person sees lights in the swamp” to “top-gun pilots report flight safety hazards.” The rebranding of the phenomenon from UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) to UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, later Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) was a deliberate semantic shift designed to bypass the cultural baggage of the past. UAP sounded technical, bureaucratic, and serious.
The 2010s also saw the rise of podcasts as a dominant medium for long-form discussion. Programs like The Joe Rogan Experience gave guests like Bob Lazar and Cmdr. David Fravor hours to explain their experiences in detail, reaching tens of millions of listeners. This format allowed for nuance that was impossible in a three-minute news segment. The public began to realize the complexity of the issue. It was no longer about belief; it was about data.
Institutional reaction began to follow the public interest. The US Navy drafted new guidelines for pilots to report unauthorized airspace incursions, acknowledging that the previous stigma had caused a failure in intelligence collection. The acknowledgement that “something” was in the sky was no longer a fringe theory; it was a confirmed national security fact. The question shifted from “Are they real?” to “What are they, and whose are they?”
The Modern Era of Official Acknowledgement
Entering the 2020s, the momentum generated in late 2017 solidified into formal government action. This period, extending to the present day of 2025, is defined by the infographic as a time of “Mainstream Debate” and high public belief. The scale of serious media coverage has reached levels previously unimaginable, with regular segments on major news networks dedicated to UAP updates.
The legislative branch of the United States government became the primary driver of transparency. Senators and Representatives, briefed in classified settings, began to attach amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) requiring reports and the establishment of permanent offices to study UAP. This led to the creation of the UAP Task Force, which was later succeeded by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). These offices were mandated by law to report their findings to Congress and the public, creating a mechanism for accountability that had never existed before.
In June 2021, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a preliminary assessment on UAP. While the report was cautious, it confirmed 144 cases of UAP originating from US government sources, primarily Navy pilots. Of these 144 cases, only one could be identified (as a deflating balloon). The report explicitly stated that some of these objects appeared to demonstrate advanced technology and that they represented a flight safety issue. This document effectively ended the debate on whether the phenomenon existed. The government admitted it was real and that they did not know what it was.
The year 2023 marked another escalation in the discourse with the public testimony of David Grusch. Grusch, a former intelligence officer and representative to the UAP Task Force, testified under oath before a House Oversight subcommittee. He alleged that the US government was in possession of “intact and partially intact” craft of non-human origin and that a multi-decade crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program had been operating illegally without Congressional oversight. While these claims were met with skepticism by some, the fact that a credentialed intelligence officer was making these statements in a formal congressional hearing was a watershed moment.
NASA, an agency that had historically distanced itself from the UFO topic, entered the fray in the 2020s. Under the leadership of Administrator Bill Nelson, NASA commissioned an independent study team to determine how the agency’s data assets could be used to study UAP. This move signaled to the scientific community that the topic was now safe for inquiry. The resulting report emphasized the need to move from anecdotal evidence to high-quality sensor data, effectively calling for the scientific method to be applied to UAP.
The modern era is also characterized by a sophisticated public conversation regarding the nature of the intelligence. Theories have expanded beyond the “Extraterrestrial Hypothesis” (ET from another planet) to include interdimensional, ultraterrestrial, or cryptoterrestrial possibilities. The “Shifting Paradigm” noted in the infographic refers to this broadening of the ontological horizon. Society is currently in the process of integrating the reality of NHI into its worldview, a process that involves revisiting history, religion, and physics.
The Role of Mass Media in Shaping Perception
The transformation of the UAP narrative is fundamentally a story about media framing. In the 1990s, the media acted as a filter, removing serious discussion and letting through only the ridiculous. In the 2020s, the media acts as an amplifier for serious inquiry. This shift was not accidental but was the result of a feedback loop between credible sources and brave journalism.
The visual language of the coverage has changed. In the past, news segments would use stock footage of 1950s flying saucers or clips from sci-fi movies. Today, news segments use the verified FLIR footage released by the Pentagon. The typography used in graphics has shifted from “spooky” fonts to the standard, authoritative fonts used for political or military news. This subtle visual cue tells the viewer that this is “real news.”
Investigative journalism has returned to the forefront. Journalists like Ross Coulthart, George Knapp, and Jeremy Corbell have dedicated their careers to cultivating sources within the military-industrial complex. Their reporting often breaks stories that are later confirmed by official channels. The mainstream media, initially playing catch-up, now regularly features these journalists as subject matter experts.
Social media has accelerated this process. Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit serve as rapid-reaction forces. When a sighting occurs or a document is released, the “UFO Twitter” community analyzes it within minutes. While this can lead to the spread of misinformation, it also provides a crowdsourced intelligence capability that holds official narratives accountable. If the government releases a debunking explanation that does not fit the data, the online community will often find the discrepancy immediately.
Scientific Engagement and Academic Inquiry
For decades, the scientific community was absent from the UAP conversation. The stigma associated with the topic meant that studying it was seen as career suicide. Funding was non-existent, and peer-reviewed journals would not accept papers on the subject. This changed dramatically in the 2020s.
The Galileo Project, led by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb, represents the first systematic scientific search for evidence of extraterrestrial technological artifacts. Unlike government programs that rely on classified data, the Galileo Project focuses on collecting open, unclassified data using a network of custom-built telescopes and sensors. The goal is to bring the study of UAP out of the shadows of the intelligence world and into the light of academic scrutiny.
The Sol Foundation, established in 2023, is another example of this academic shift. It brings together experts from academia, government, and industry to address the philosophical, policy, and scientific implications of UAP. By hosting symposiums at prestigious universities like Stanford, the Sol Foundation validates the topic as worthy of high-level intellectual engagement.
This scientific engagement is important because it moves the evidentiary standard from witness testimony to hard data. Science requires repeatability and falsifiability. The current push is to establish a global network of sensors that can triangulate objects, record their spectral signatures, and measure their kinematic performance. This data can then be analyzed by physicists to determine if the objects rely on known propulsion methods or if they utilize new physics.
Cultural Impact and Societal Readiness
The infographic title “Cultural Shifting” refers to the deep psychological adjustment occurring within the population. The “Shifting Paradigm” is not just about believing in UFOs; it is about accepting that humanity may not be the apex intelligence in the environment. This realization carries with it the potential for “ontological shock” – the collapse of a worldview when confronted with a reality that cannot be reconciled with previous beliefs.
Surveys and polls conducted in the 2020s show a steady increase in the percentage of the population that believes NHI is visiting Earth. This belief is no longer correlated with lower education levels; in fact, many highly educated professionals are now the most engaged with the topic. The generational divide is also significant. Younger generations, raised on a diet of expansive media and less tethered to Cold War-era dogmas, are generally more accepting of the UAP reality.
Religious institutions have also begun to grapple with the implications. The Catholic Church, for instance, has stated that the existence of extraterrestrial life would not contradict the faith, as God’s creation is boundless. Theologians and philosophers are debating how the presence of NHI would impact concepts of the soul, redemption, and human purpose.
The “threat narrative” is another aspect of the cultural shift. While the military frames UAP as a potential threat to secure funding and jurisdiction, many in the public and the contactee community view the phenomenon through a lens of hope or spiritual awakening. The tension between “UAP as threat” and “UAP as neighbor” is likely to define the cultural discourse for the coming decades.
The Future of Transparency and Disclosure
Looking toward 2025 and beyond, the trajectory indicated by the infographic suggests a continued escalation of transparency. The “Catastrophic Disclosure” scenario – where information leaks out in an uncontrolled manner due to whistleblower frustration – remains a possibility that the government seeks to avoid. The preferred path is “Controlled Disclosure,” a gradual release of information that allows society to acclimate to the new reality without panic.
Legislative efforts continue to be the primary tool for forcing this disclosure. The “UAP Disclosure Act,” championed by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, aims to create a review board similar to the one created for the JFK assassination files. This board would have the authority to declassify records over the objection of intelligence agencies, provided there is no immediate harm to national security.
The international dimension is also expanding. Countries like France (through GEIPAN) and countries in South America (Chile, Brazil) have long had more open policies regarding UFOs. As the US stigma evaporates, these nations are becoming more vocal, leading to a potential global consensus on the reality of the phenomenon.
The space economy is also intersecting with UAP. As private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin launch more sensors and humans into orbit, the likelihood of a private entity capturing high-resolution evidence increases. This privatization of space surveillance means that governments can no longer maintain a monopoly on orbital data.
Summary
The thirty-year period from 1995 to 2025 represents a complete inversion of the status quo regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Society has moved from a state of enforced ignorance and ridicule to one of active investigation and legislative oversight. The “Tabloid Era” of the 1990s, dominated by hoaxes and skepticism, gave way to the “Internet Era” of the 2000s, where data began to aggregate outside of official channels. The “Modern Era” of the 2010s and 2020s, triggered by the 2017 New York Times revelations and sustained by credible whistleblowers, has institutionalized the study of UAP.
This cultural shift is characterized by the validation of witness testimony, the application of the scientific method, and the engagement of high-level government officials. The “Giggle Factor” has been replaced by the “National Security Imperative.” While definitive answers regarding the origin and intent of NHI remain elusive, the question of their existence has been settled in the affirmative by the actions of the United States government. The paradigm has shifted, and the civilization is now in the process of adapting to a universe that is far more complex and populated than previously acknowledged.
| Era | Key Characteristics | Media Sentiment | Public Belief | Major Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | Tabloid Era, Fringe Topic, Ridicule | Skepticism & Ridicule (1-2/10) | Low | Alien Autopsy Hoax, Phoenix Lights, X-Files Popularity |
| 2000s | Internet Forums, Independent Research | Occasional Curiosity (3-4/10) | Medium | O’Hare Sighting, Stephenville Sighting, Nimitz Encounter (Classified) |
| 2010s | Breaking the Dam, Whistleblowers | Investigative Journalism (6-8/10) | High | 2017 NYT Article, AATIP Revealed, Navy Videos Released |
| 2020s | Official Acknowledgement, Mainstream Debate | Serious Coverage (9-10/10) | Very High | Congressional Hearings, Grusch Testimony, NASA Study, AARO Established |
Appendix: Top 10 Questions Answered in This Article
What was the “Giggle Factor” in the context of UFOs?
The “Giggle Factor” refers to the social stigma and reflexive ridicule that accompanied any mention of UFOs in the 1990s and 2000s. It acted as a psychological barrier, preventing scientists, pilots, and journalists from taking the subject seriously for fear of damaging their professional reputations.
What event in 2017 changed the global conversation on UAP?
The publication of a front-page article in The New York Times revealing the Pentagon’s secret Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) and the release of three Navy videos (FLIR, GIMBAL, GOFAST) fundamentally shifted the conversation. This event provided credible evidence and institutional validation that forced the mainstream media to treat the topic seriously.
How did the internet influence UAP research in the 2000s?
The internet democratized data collection and allowed witnesses to bypass traditional media gatekeepers. Online forums and independent research groups aggregated sighting reports, video evidence, and analysis, preserving data that would have otherwise been lost and building a foundation of knowledge for future investigation.
Who is David Grusch and why is his testimony significant?
David Grusch is a former intelligence officer and UAP Task Force representative who testified under oath to Congress in 2023. His allegations that the US government possesses intact non-human craft and operates an illegal crash retrieval program escalated the issue from a flight safety concern to a constitutional crisis regarding oversight.
What is the difference between UFO and UAP?
UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object, while UAP stands for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). The term UAP was adopted by the government and military to destigmatize the subject, remove the cultural baggage associated with “flying saucers,” and include objects that may operate in multiple domains (air, sea, space).
What role did the Phoenix Lights play in 1990s UAP culture?
The Phoenix Lights incident of 1997 was a massive mass-sighting event that was initially met with ridicule by government officials, including the Arizona governor. It exemplified the 1990s dynamic where even undeniable events were dismissed by the media and authorities to maintain the status quo of skepticism.
How has the scientific community engaged with UAP in the 2020s?
The scientific community has begun to engage through initiatives like the Galileo Project at Harvard and the Sol Foundation. These organizations aim to use open, unclassified data and rigorous scientific methodology to study UAP, moving the field away from anecdote and toward verifiable physics and sensor data.
What is the 2021 ODNI Preliminary Assessment?
The 2021 ODNI Preliminary Assessment was a report released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that examined 144 UAP cases, mostly from military sources. It confirmed that UAP are real physical objects that pose a safety of flight issue and cannot be explained by current US technology, validating the phenomenon officially.
What is “Ontological Shock”?
Ontological shock describes the significant psychological and worldview disruption that occurs when an individual or society is confronted with a reality that fundamentally contradicts their previous understanding of existence. In the context of UAP, it refers to the potential societal impact of confirming the presence of a non-human intelligence.
How have legislative efforts advanced UAP transparency?
Legislative efforts, primarily through the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), have forced the military and intelligence agencies to report on UAP activities. These laws established the UAP Task Force and AARO, mandated annual reports to Congress, and provided whistleblower protections that allowed individuals to come forward with information.
Appendix: Top 10 Frequently Searched Questions Answered in This Article
Are UFOs considered a threat to national security?
The US government and military officially classify UAP as a potential national security threat primarily due to flight safety hazards and the possibility of foreign adversarial technology. The unexplained performance characteristics of these objects in sensitive military airspace compel defense officials to treat them as a security concern until identified.
Why did the government change the name from UFO to UAP?
The name change was a deliberate effort to reframe the conversation and distance the subject from the ridicule, pop culture tropes, and “little green men” stigma associated with the term UFO. UAP sounds more technical and clinical, allowing government officials and scientists to discuss the data without immediate bias.
What are the three famous Navy UFO videos?
The three videos are known as “FLIR1,” “GIMBAL,” and “GOFAST.” They were captured by infrared targeting pods on US Navy fighter jets and show objects moving at high speeds, rotating against the wind, and accelerating without visible means of propulsion.
Did the Pentagon admit that UFOs are real?
Yes, the Pentagon has admitted that the videos are authentic and that they show “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.” They established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to investigate these incursions, effectively admitting that the phenomenon exists and requires official study.
What happened during the 2004 Nimitz encounter?
During the 2004 Nimitz encounter, US Navy pilots and radar operators tracked “Tic Tac” shaped objects that descended from space to sea level in seconds and outmaneuvered fighter jets. The incident is considered one of the most credible cases due to the combination of visual pilot testimony and multi-sensor radar confirmation.
Is NASA studying UFOs now?
Yes, NASA established an independent study team in 2022 to evaluate how the agency’s existing data and satellites could be used to investigate UAP. They released a report recommending a scientific approach and the integration of AI to analyze data anomalies, signaling a shift toward active engagement.
What is the Sol Foundation?
The Sol Foundation is an academic and policy-oriented organization established to research the implications of UAP. It brings together scholars, scientists, and government officials to study the social, political, and scientific consequences of contact with non-human intelligence.
What was the Alien Autopsy video?
The Alien Autopsy video was a famous hoax broadcast in 1995 that claimed to show the medical examination of an alien from the Roswell crash. Its subsequent debunking significantly damaged the credibility of UAP research during the 1990s and reinforced the “tabloid” perception of the topic.
Can regular people report UFO sightings?
While historically there was no central reporting system, organizations like MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) and the National UFO Reporting Center have collected civilian reports for decades. More recently, groups like Enigma Labs are developing apps to allow for standardized, data-rich reporting from the public.
What is the Schumer-Rounds Amendment?
The Schumer-Rounds Amendment is a piece of legislation proposed to be part of the National Defense Authorization Act. It seeks to mandate the declassification of government records related to UAP and establish a review board to oversee the release of information to the public, modelled after the JFK Records Act.
